Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

TOR?Are you kiding me?

So? F-14s at least dump all their missiles at start and you’re good after that, the Su-27 being the same BR with 6x R-27ER’s just gonna ruin everything and force you to play defensively always.

1 Like

Breda 501 should stay 4.7 in ground rb, it’s not that strong, sure i can one tap tigers but the second somebody sees me i get 7.2mm bullets that sends me into the shadow realm

Also sagittario and ariete planes should be downtiered to 9.0/8.7 in air rb

ariete (P) should not be put at 10.7 as it is underperforming

chaparrals should not be downtiered but left at their current br

you should give historically accurate aim 120 to italian f16 ADF as asked by multiple players in the various reports, as Italy historically joined the Peace Caesar F-16 program because the Tornado ADV italy owned didn’t support fox 3 installation and so it opted in the program until the development of the Eurofighter Typhoon;

Other than this overall minor details the br changes are welcomed by me
Continue with the good work!

2 Likes

Are you claiming a crewless turret and composite screens don’t help with survivability?

Vehicle in question:
AH129 Int(P), T129 ATAK
BR: 10.7>10.3
While the mangusta is an exceptional helicopter, the other 2 prem versions of it suffers from problems that are drastic enough for them to be lower.

Ariete/PSO’s BR increased to 11.7? Ariete AMV upgraded to 12.0 BR ? Although their reload speed improved, there poor armor makes it difficult to compare with vehicles in the same BR. At mean time, although Ariete AMV’s power has been increased, due to its terrible transmission system, the extra power is not reflected in maneuverability. Also the Ariete AMV has the worst armor among all the Ariete family. For Ariete’s BR, the ideal approach is to replace Ariete’s DM53 which never used in real world with CL3143, increase reload time to 5 seconds, and put all Arietes in 11.3 BR, the same BR as M1A1.Italy has already received the Leopard 2A7HU, so there is no need to keep the Arietes as Italy’s top ter tanks in the highest BR.
At the same time, I suggest gaijin reconsider the situation of Otomatic. Compared with 2S38, OTO only has one more scanning radar and a slightly longer range, but its maneuverability, NVD performance and the number of APSFDS carried are far worse than 2S38, but a 1.0 higher BR.Keep OTO needs discrease its BR.
The performance of KF41’s APS in actual combat is quite poor. It often occurs that the interception is successful but the missile’s armor-piercing warhead jet still penetrates the armor. The Spike MR is not as good as the Spike LR. Its performance in actual combat is far inferior to that of the PUMA VJTF without APS equipment. It is not even as powerful as Freccia in use. It is recommended that the BR of KF41 be maintained at 10.7.
Strela-10M2 is a quite powerful anti-aircraft missile. Any experienced player can achieve high anti-aircraft efficiency within its locking range. It is recommended to increase its BR to 10.7.

4 Likes

AIR REALISTIC, AMX A1-A. 11.3 > 10.3. This vehicle is no different than the regular AMX on the tech tree but gets a massive BR increase for being a little inferior than the AMX on the normal italian tech tree

6 Likes

yes,now only Soviet and China‘s loadingtime are longer than 6s,especially T-90/T-72/99A is 7.1s.

8 Likes

Agree. I hate this prop even more than P-51H

1 Like

Ground RB, All Leclercs 11.7 > 11.7.

It is a massive double standard to increase the BR of the M1A1 HC and similar to 11.7 and giving them a more potent shell (M829A2) but to raise the Leclercs to 12.0, when they have a shell that is worse than the shell the M1A1 HC uses at 11.3 currently and far worse than anything their 12.0 counterparts use. To balance this properly, the Leclercs have to remain at 11.7 if they cannot receive a new shell, as the power of the M1A1 HC can match or outclass the Leclerc at 11.7 in firepower with far greater survivability.

8 Likes

image

image

rooikat 105 was 9.0 not 9.3 why you increase it to 9.7

9 Likes

ground RB, Israeli Imp. Chaparral: make the MIM-72G a tier 1/2 modification
Having played this AA for 27 games with 30 plane kills, I’m not even close to the better missiles, and it’s a HORRIBLE experience.

The amount of likes has seriously shown how mythsized China top tier is. Now the TOR is as good as a pantsir.

Replace the pantsir with a Russian tor and see how they are screwed.

2 Likes

Pantsir S1 11.7 → 12.0
Reason: Umatched Anti Air capabilies to anything else ingame.

16 Likes

2S38→10.7
Recently its rounds were buffed. Now the shells can reach 16km

8 Likes

you know what is though? a lim5p which sits at 8.7, a cl13b which sits at 9.0, a g91y which sits at 9.0 and so on and so on.
The f40 being 9.0 because of missiles is no excuse for another plane to remain overtiered because it has missiles.

Ground Realistic

Pbv 501

6.7 → 7.3

It is a BMP-1 more that a whole BR lower. Its cannon is easily able to deal with any kind of vehicle it faces, since it is a HEAT shell with 300mm pen. It also have really good mobility, because it is effectively a BMP-1 without an ATGM. It doesn’t makes sense why there is such a difference just because it doesn’t have the ATGM.

10 Likes

And face Fox 3 throwers? Absolutely not. It’s more than fine where it’s at. It would get absolutely destroyed at that BR. And still waiting for Gaijin to give the early A-10s their forward spawn like they were suppose to get when they were moved up (they should go back down if they’re never going to get it).

Edit: Wait, I see what you mean. That does look like an error.

Rooikat is 9.3 in GRB

1 Like

11.7. It’s a better HSTV-L

2 Likes