they entire hull has 0 armor
same should go for all ATGM only vehicles, ZT3A2 and Swingfirem M113A3, UDES, and the rest, ATGM only armament isnt great and could really use the extra insentive to play them
1 Like
Please increase max tank BR much higher, and separate top tier vehicles accordingly. Not all 12.0s are equal, for example, Leopard 2A5 is still same BR as Leopard 2A7V.
What you’ve done is, increased the BR of nearly every MBT above 9.0, which means the battles will play virtually exactly the same as they did before.
1 Like
RB
Chi-Ri: 5.0 → 4.3
It is HUGE, not very fast, and has no armor whatsoever. Its gun is comparable in performance to the Pz IV H’s, but it is on a worse platform. Yes it has a very fast first stage reload (3.3s aced) but it can only fire a maximum of 3 rounds, at which point its reload drops to about 11s with an expert crew. Replenishing this first stage ammo also takes very long considering how close the ammorack is to the loading assist device:
If the first stage reload was reduced to a more reasonable number, or its reload outside of first stage ammo improved, I suggest only a drop to 4.7 due to large size, thin armor, and poor mobility.
8 Likes
Air arcade/realistic/simulator. BR cap 13.7 > 14.0
Reason: the top aircraft for each nation far out-perform aircraft they are capable of fighting. (As shown by the current plan to lower select aircraft BRs)
The compression caused by decreasing BRs will only cause further stress to lower BR aircraft.
Instead, moving the cap to 14.0 will allow the top performers to be moved away from aircraft they outperform, without compressing the brackets below them.
2 Likes
Vehicle in question: Chinese top tiers(VT4, ZTZ99A, WZ)
BR changes: 11.7>11.7 GRB
Alternative: fire rate buff to 6.5/6.8 seconds
The biggest weakness of top tier Chinese MBTs are their lack of firepower. Low pen and a lengthy reload. The mediocre protection and decent mobility would not be able to compensate such.
132 Likes
But your moving crap unfinished tanks that cant compete up. At least do due diligence and make these tanks competitive.
2 Likes
GRB, Su-27SM. 12.7 → 12.0-12.3, no Thermal container. Or leave BR as is, but give it thermal container
1 Like
If you are adding M829A2 to the M1A1s at 11.7, you must add M829A3 to the SEPs at 12.0
1 Like
Gen 1 TIALD :trolloge:
Its as simple as giving them DM53s, nato 120 compat after all.
the lower front plate of every MBT at the top BR can be penetrated, Challenger 2, 3, Ariete, Leo 2, Type 10 and so on, this is not a weakness of the tank
the only weakness of the abrams bar the neck is that all those who play it appear to be lobotomites
2 Likes
Why Mirage 4000 is 12.7?
If you are increasing F-14B to 13.0, it must get AIM9M.
F-14A should get AIM-9L if it is moving up to 12.7. Currently, there is no advantage the F-14A has over the F-14A IRIAF, and after these BR changes they will still remain at the same BR. F-14A must get AIM-9L if it is to remain at the same BR as the IRIAF
6 Likes
Gaijin, can you read this link please ?
Realistic naval, MTB-96. 2.0 → 1.7. Weak 20mm fragile wooden boat
Realistic naval, L9059. 2.7 → 2.3. Low survivability. All crew member in bridge
Realistic naval ,VLT-1. 3.7 → 3.0. Wooden boat very fragile. Better 3.0 ship more armed in US tree
Realistic naval ,VLT-2. 3.7 → 3.0. Wooden boat very fragile. Better 3.0 ship more armed in US tree
Realistic naval, La Combattante. 4.0 → 3.3 Useless slow missile that do not hull break everything compared to other ships at his BR. Cannot defend themself VS air
It is not: it is 13.0 in ARB
are you insane? The F-14B goes up to 13.0 too, how are they equal in any way?
you can pen the upper, lower, side, really any part of the abrams hull. Not just the “neck”.
arb, amx a-1. 11.3 > 10.7 Reason : jet slow,cant bomb base… phantomor fast jet always clear that base, piranha easy to flare…
2 Likes
ARB F-14B: please consider adding aim-9m to F-14B seeing it’s same br as Su-27, J-11 and higher than F-16A
3 Likes