Why Mirage 4000 is 12.7?
If you are increasing F-14B to 13.0, it must get AIM9M.
F-14A should get AIM-9L if it is moving up to 12.7. Currently, there is no advantage the F-14A has over the F-14A IRIAF, and after these BR changes they will still remain at the same BR. F-14A must get AIM-9L if it is to remain at the same BR as the IRIAF
Gaijin, can you read this link please ?
Realistic naval, MTB-96. 2.0 → 1.7. Weak 20mm fragile wooden boat
Realistic naval, L9059. 2.7 → 2.3. Low survivability. All crew member in bridge
Realistic naval ,VLT-1. 3.7 → 3.0. Wooden boat very fragile. Better 3.0 ship more armed in US tree
Realistic naval ,VLT-2. 3.7 → 3.0. Wooden boat very fragile. Better 3.0 ship more armed in US tree
Realistic naval, La Combattante. 4.0 → 3.3 Useless slow missile that do not hull break everything compared to other ships at his BR. Cannot defend themself VS air
It is not: it is 13.0 in ARB
are you insane? The F-14B goes up to 13.0 too, how are they equal in any way?
you can pen the upper, lower, side, really any part of the abrams hull. Not just the “neck”.
arb, amx a-1. 11.3 > 10.7 Reason : jet slow,cant bomb base… phantomor fast jet always clear that base, piranha easy to flare…
ARB F-14B: please consider adding aim-9m to F-14B seeing it’s same br as Su-27, J-11 and higher than F-16A
2S38 10.3>11.7
For all intents and purposes it’s a HSTV-L with slightly less penetration, better survivability and triple the fire rate
Ground Realistic
Pe-8
4.3 → 5.0
With its defensive armaments being probably one of the best in the game for its BR, at the same time it is able to absorb a lot of damage compared to a lot of the other bombers of same BR, making it nearly impossible to kill it in one pass with a plane, making it that you either have to use a lot of time to get to an advantageous position again, or risk placing yourself in a position where you quite quickly will be killed, or at best crippled, making you need to go back to the airfield to repair. This in combination of it being able to carry the 5000kg bomb, that is able to destroy tanks through multiple buildings.
The early F104s still need to got up in RB!
ARB
P-51H
6.3>6.7
amazing performance, good guns and faces much weaker props
Vehicle in question: Z-9WA
BR: 10.7>10.7 GRB
TY-90s has been nerfed multiple times. The vehicle already lacks a proper RWR, and an adequate AGM - it should not be superior to other 10.3, now 10.7 helicopters.
Air RB P-51H-5-NA 6.3-> 6.7 It does not matte that much since BR is focus on 6.0 and 7.0 but with Spitfire Mk 22 and 24 move to 6.7 and 6.3 P-51H should be comparable to spitfire Mk 24 and hence a 6.7 BR
yeah, 12000lbs is 5.3, so 5000kg won’t have a too low br
They’re already deserving of a BR step up with it’s current loadout, very much so. You’re saying a separate massive change/improvement in missiles (to the already great Fakour/Phoenix) doesn’t constitute any change in BR whatsoever?
Compression is as trash as it can be keep that in mind, but do you really want F-14s to still dominate 11.3 and 11.7 downtiers
Air & Ground Realistic
Spitfire Mk 22
6.7 → 6.3
The Mk 24 as it currently stands, is at a good BR, however the performance Between the Mk 22 and Mk 24 is so big that the Mk 22 should be moved down one BR bracket.
Ground realistic, Ajs-37 10.7 → 10.3.
Reason: It can only carry 3 agm65a and 2 aim9j’s with countermeasures. Compare this with the Ayit, A7d, Buccaneer S.2B and Hunter f.58 and you see that the Ajs-37 loudout is lacking. Other planes can carry more ordnance/bettter at a lower br. Only pro of the Ajs-37 is speed.
So now France has a 3.3 br gap at top tier , way to go Gaijin