Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Hello, I’d like to request another look at this vehicle in particular:

Mode: Air Realistic;
Vehicle: ITA AMX-1a (Brazilian Premium);
BR: 11.3>10.7;
Reason is the premium version, in Air Realistic only, doesn’t have a particular better performance than its Tech Tree counterpart the AMX, which sits at 10.7. The advantage is the targetting pod with thermals against ground targets, but that doesn’t matter in Air RB!! The missiles and guns are different, but they aren’t strictly better against planes and the jet’s performance afaik is the same too, I see no reason to keep them separate like this.

7 Likes

ZTZ99s all and WZ1001, give them their historical 6 sec reload, so they stop being worst tanks and make new models like you did with 99A for smaller LFP

82 Likes

If all the outstanding issues with the Challenger 2s were fixed I wouldn’t mind them going up, for example the 400mm CHA mantlet and collection of RHA plates at various angles and thicknesses somehow still comes out to just ~250mm effective protection in what’s supposedly the thicker parts of the mantlet armour…

3 Likes

THE ABRAMS AT 10.7 WITHOUT M833 OR M900 BRUHHHHHHHHH ARE GUYS LITERALLY DEAD SERIOUS RIGHT NOW? I can’t fathom how this can be accepted,you’re basically kicking an already dead tank countless of times

1 Like

I play the arietes and CR2 and honestly I would have a dart that punches through T-80s easily rather than something that cant even 1shot something LFP. The CR2 is just as unprotected but the ariete has worse surviability.
Not to mention the C1s has the same ROF now.

Yeah… That is my same stance. In their current state. I think they could do with going down to be a lower BR than they are currently. not going up. But baby steps and all that

1 Like

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV F2

3.3 → 3.7

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.

6 Likes

4.7 F8F-1??? What were you thinking
image

33 Likes

Kurnass 2000 12.3 → 11.7 ARB
It does have only all-aspect missiles and it faces jets with FOX-3. It does not have SARH missiles to compensate current BR

13 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV G

3.3 → 3.7

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.

6 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV H

3.7 → 4.0 + Rank 2 → 3

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV H should also get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.

14 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV J

Rank 2 → 3

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV J compared to the Pz.IV H, have a tradeoff in regards to its turret rotation, that makes it more balanced for its current BR. However it should still get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.

12 Likes

RB

Chi-Nu: 3.3 → 3.0

At 3.3 it is currently competing with the Pz IV F2 and G, which have better armor, better mobility, and a much more powerful gun; and the M4A1, with better mobility, better armor, and a gun stabilizer. All of these widely played medium tanks vastly outclass the Chi-Nu.

8 Likes

Kurnass 2000s are AMRAAM capable per theory, as other aircrafts using the same radar can fire AMRAAMs(PI2000 HAF, T2020 TAF). That is another topic, but yeah, I would say get them down in BR first.

2 Likes

My point was in the reply that the OES is fine. Every time i get in the OES its almost always a near nuke or even a nuke. ITS just that good of tank, insane armor, good round. overall amazing.

sounds like a skill issue

2 Likes

but it’s staying in the same place relative to other vehicles, you’re better off pointing out that it’s a good opportunity to keep it where it is (effectively moving it down a bit)

Vehicle: VIDAR
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change: 8.0 ----> 8.7
Reason: It has good thermal and laser rangefinder, as well as armor enough to withstand 20mm and 12.7mm shots. All these make it a deadly howitzer, they compensate for any disadvantage of a howitzer.

23 Likes

Ground Realistic

T-34 (1940)

3.3 → 3.7

Good mobility, good cannon, and really good armor for its BR, makes this extremly dominant. While there are tanks that can pen it when it faces them straight with its front, it is quickly able to turn its hull to make it near impossible for them to aim at any kind of weak spot. At the same time the increase in BR would also make it closer to the other T-34’s that was moved up last BR change.

7 Likes

GRB, Sd.Kfz.234/2. 3.7>3.0. With totally vulnerable armor and extremely slow turret rotation speed, the damage effect of 50mm guns is not effective against enemy targets of the same weight

1 Like