Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Kurnass 2000 12.3 → 11.7 ARB
It does have only all-aspect missiles and it faces jets with FOX-3. It does not have SARH missiles to compensate current BR

13 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV G

3.3 → 3.7

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.

6 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV H

3.7 → 4.0 + Rank 2 → 3

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV H should also get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.

14 Likes

Ground Realistic

Pz.IV J

Rank 2 → 3

Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV J compared to the Pz.IV H, have a tradeoff in regards to its turret rotation, that makes it more balanced for its current BR. However it should still get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.

12 Likes

RB

Chi-Nu: 3.3 → 3.0

At 3.3 it is currently competing with the Pz IV F2 and G, which have better armor, better mobility, and a much more powerful gun; and the M4A1, with better mobility, better armor, and a gun stabilizer. All of these widely played medium tanks vastly outclass the Chi-Nu.

8 Likes

Kurnass 2000s are AMRAAM capable per theory, as other aircrafts using the same radar can fire AMRAAMs(PI2000 HAF, T2020 TAF). That is another topic, but yeah, I would say get them down in BR first.

2 Likes

My point was in the reply that the OES is fine. Every time i get in the OES its almost always a near nuke or even a nuke. ITS just that good of tank, insane armor, good round. overall amazing.

sounds like a skill issue

2 Likes

but it’s staying in the same place relative to other vehicles, you’re better off pointing out that it’s a good opportunity to keep it where it is (effectively moving it down a bit)

Vehicle: VIDAR
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change: 8.0 ----> 8.7
Reason: It has good thermal and laser rangefinder, as well as armor enough to withstand 20mm and 12.7mm shots. All these make it a deadly howitzer, they compensate for any disadvantage of a howitzer.

23 Likes

Ground Realistic

T-34 (1940)

3.3 → 3.7

Good mobility, good cannon, and really good armor for its BR, makes this extremly dominant. While there are tanks that can pen it when it faces them straight with its front, it is quickly able to turn its hull to make it near impossible for them to aim at any kind of weak spot. At the same time the increase in BR would also make it closer to the other T-34’s that was moved up last BR change.

7 Likes

GRB, Sd.Kfz.234/2. 3.7>3.0. With totally vulnerable armor and extremely slow turret rotation speed, the damage effect of 50mm guns is not effective against enemy targets of the same weight

1 Like

What is the matter with this ?

Pantsir-s1 >11.7+

The best SPAA with more combat efficiency way over then other SPAA

7 Likes

Aircrafts in GRB

F-16D Blk 40 Barak II(IDF/AF)
13.7>13.0
Despite 2 very good IR guided bombs, the lack of mavericks still made barak IIs very inflexible to play. While it can deal with pantsirs more effectively, it cannot exploit the lack of AA like USAF/BAF F-16s.

Vehicle: HMS York
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.7 ----> 5.3
Reason: Unlike many other Heavy Cruisers at 5.7. The York only has 6x 8" guns and not 8 that most others have. This greatly limits its firepower vs most other ships. It also is severly lacking in armour vs many other Heavy Cruisers

9 Likes

No; what Leclerc needs is for its armor and mobility to be fixed.

Its UFP should be as strong as the mid glacis, S.2 and S.XXI should get their turret improvements, and they should all accelerate WAY quicker than they currently do.

These real fixes would be much better than the artificial band-aid of a higher pen shell.

5 Likes

Also the lack of armor. Arguably anyone that isnt the London or Kent with their extra 4in should be 5.3.

should have clarified that I meant against frontal armor my bad

Ground RB/AB/SB, Pantsir-S1. 11.7 > 12.0.

Why aren’t the any of the top tier SPAA moving up? Things like the Pantsir-S1 need to be 12.0 right now given the amazing capabilities this SPAA has.

14 Likes