THE ABRAMS AT 10.7 WITHOUT M833 OR M900 BRUHHHHHHHHH ARE GUYS LITERALLY DEAD SERIOUS RIGHT NOW? I can’t fathom how this can be accepted,you’re basically kicking an already dead tank countless of times
1 Like
I play the arietes and CR2 and honestly I would have a dart that punches through T-80s easily rather than something that cant even 1shot something LFP. The CR2 is just as unprotected but the ariete has worse surviability.
Not to mention the C1s has the same ROF now.
Yeah… That is my same stance. In their current state. I think they could do with going down to be a lower BR than they are currently. not going up. But baby steps and all that
1 Like
Ground Realistic
Pz.IV F2
3.3 → 3.7
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.
6 Likes
4.7 F8F-1??? What were you thinking
33 Likes
Kurnass 2000 12.3 → 11.7 ARB
It does have only all-aspect missiles and it faces jets with FOX-3. It does not have SARH missiles to compensate current BR
13 Likes
Ground Realistic
Pz.IV G
3.3 → 3.7
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.
6 Likes
Ground Realistic
Pz.IV H
3.7 → 4.0 + Rank 2 → 3
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV H should also get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.
14 Likes
Ground Realistic
Pz.IV J
Rank 2 → 3
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV J compared to the Pz.IV H, have a tradeoff in regards to its turret rotation, that makes it more balanced for its current BR. However it should still get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.
12 Likes
RB
Chi-Nu: 3.3 → 3.0
At 3.3 it is currently competing with the Pz IV F2 and G, which have better armor, better mobility, and a much more powerful gun; and the M4A1, with better mobility, better armor, and a gun stabilizer. All of these widely played medium tanks vastly outclass the Chi-Nu.
8 Likes
Kurnass 2000s are AMRAAM capable per theory, as other aircrafts using the same radar can fire AMRAAMs(PI2000 HAF, T2020 TAF). That is another topic, but yeah, I would say get them down in BR first.
2 Likes
My point was in the reply that the OES is fine. Every time i get in the OES its almost always a near nuke or even a nuke. ITS just that good of tank, insane armor, good round. overall amazing.
sounds like a skill issue
2 Likes
but it’s staying in the same place relative to other vehicles, you’re better off pointing out that it’s a good opportunity to keep it where it is (effectively moving it down a bit)
Vehicle: VIDAR
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change: 8.0 ----> 8.7
Reason: It has good thermal and laser rangefinder, as well as armor enough to withstand 20mm and 12.7mm shots. All these make it a deadly howitzer, they compensate for any disadvantage of a howitzer.
23 Likes
Ground Realistic
T-34 (1940)
3.3 → 3.7
Good mobility, good cannon, and really good armor for its BR, makes this extremly dominant. While there are tanks that can pen it when it faces them straight with its front, it is quickly able to turn its hull to make it near impossible for them to aim at any kind of weak spot. At the same time the increase in BR would also make it closer to the other T-34’s that was moved up last BR change.
7 Likes
GRB, Sd.Kfz.234/2. 3.7>3.0. With totally vulnerable armor and extremely slow turret rotation speed, the damage effect of 50mm guns is not effective against enemy targets of the same weight
1 Like
What is the matter with this ?
Pantsir-s1 >11.7+
The best SPAA with more combat efficiency way over then other SPAA
7 Likes
Aircrafts in GRB
F-16D Blk 40 Barak II(IDF/AF)
13.7>13.0
Despite 2 very good IR guided bombs, the lack of mavericks still made barak IIs very inflexible to play. While it can deal with pantsirs more effectively, it cannot exploit the lack of AA like USAF/BAF F-16s.