thanks
so they become unplayble
The F-86F-2 is at 8.7 with vastly better armament instead of the longer wings with slats. It’s a worthy trade. Plus, the Sabres already see enough supersonics, no need to make it worse.
Ever heard of the Kh-38?
1 Like
Ground Realistic
Pz.38(t) n.A
Rank 1 → 2
Move it up in rank, and give back its ability to scout. As it currently is in the game, there is no reason to play this thing.
15 Likes
Hey Stona, first of all The Merkava/Ariete buffs are amazing news and top tier ground decompression is a really good step in the right direction.
However do you happen to know if the devs are aware of how oppressing it feels to fight the 2A7s and Strv 122s at top tier, and maybe if they have some plans in the pipeline to help remedy the situation?
1 Like
Chieftain Mk.10 9.3 → 9.0
It’s a 8.7 Chieftain, but with APFSDS and it shouldn’t have 2 steps BR difference
10 Likes
HELL YES, this would be amazing to see. The DEDICATED SCOUT TANK will be able to do its job!
2 Likes
F-4EJ KAI - air RB - 12.3 → 12.0
It shouldn’t be 12.3 because of
Flight model not having the Agile Eagle
Every F-4EJ are going down in BR, as the F-16AJ.
Missile wise, it have 2 less missiles than F-4S which is as good if not better.
10 Likes
Weak?? my friend the ariete, abrams, need i go on??
1 Like
Vehicle: Challenger 2 Black Night
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.0 ----> 11.7
Reason: Whilst the Black Night has a notable upgrade over the earlier Challenger 2s that justify it being 0.3 BR higher than them. It does not have the performance to match any of the top tier MBTs. It should be 0.3 BR lower than the 2A7V, 122 and BVM.
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
16 Likes
Vehicle: Challenger 2E
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.0 ----> 11.7
Reason: Whilst the 2E has a notable upgrade over the earlier Challenger 2s that justify it being 0.3 BR higher than them. It does not have the performance to match any of the top tier MBTs. It should be 0.3 BR lower than the 2A7V, 122 and BVM.
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
17 Likes
Hello, I’d like to request another look at this vehicle in particular:
Mode: Air Realistic;
Vehicle: ITA AMX-1a (Brazilian Premium);
BR: 11.3>10.7;
Reason is the premium version, in Air Realistic only, doesn’t have a particular better performance than its Tech Tree counterpart the AMX, which sits at 10.7. The advantage is the targetting pod with thermals against ground targets, but that doesn’t matter in Air RB!! The missiles and guns are different, but they aren’t strictly better against planes and the jet’s performance afaik is the same too, I see no reason to keep them separate like this.
7 Likes
ZTZ99s all and WZ1001, give them their historical 6 sec reload, so they stop being worst tanks and make new models like you did with 99A for smaller LFP
82 Likes
If all the outstanding issues with the Challenger 2s were fixed I wouldn’t mind them going up, for example the 400mm CHA mantlet and collection of RHA plates at various angles and thicknesses somehow still comes out to just ~250mm effective protection in what’s supposedly the thicker parts of the mantlet armour…
3 Likes
THE ABRAMS AT 10.7 WITHOUT M833 OR M900 BRUHHHHHHHHH ARE GUYS LITERALLY DEAD SERIOUS RIGHT NOW? I can’t fathom how this can be accepted,you’re basically kicking an already dead tank countless of times
1 Like
I play the arietes and CR2 and honestly I would have a dart that punches through T-80s easily rather than something that cant even 1shot something LFP. The CR2 is just as unprotected but the ariete has worse surviability.
Not to mention the C1s has the same ROF now.
Yeah… That is my same stance. In their current state. I think they could do with going down to be a lower BR than they are currently. not going up. But baby steps and all that
1 Like
Ground Realistic
Pz.IV F2
3.3 → 3.7
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skil since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration.
6 Likes
4.7 F8F-1??? What were you thinking
33 Likes