Air RB, Vampire FB 5. 8.0 > 7.7
The aircraft is far too slow for its BR, unable to make it to the battlefield before the match is almost over much less get to the fight.
Air RB, Vampire FB 5. 8.0 > 7.7
The aircraft is far too slow for its BR, unable to make it to the battlefield before the match is almost over much less get to the fight.
MMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm dam it
Why don’t the SPAAs being changed together? Is the pantsir-S1 only worth 11.7?
so, did you guys just pull the naval changes out of a hat or did you use a ouija board?
Air Realistic
Me 262 A-1a
7.0 → 6.7
It is probably the worst 7.0 jet in the game by a long shot. While it can achieve a good speed, it is very slow to do so, and most other jets it faces is a lot faster than it. At the same time its armarments is really hard to use because its velocity, especially in the jet combat.
The JA37D is at 12.0 with 6 AIM-9L’s and the option for 4 x 9L and 2 x Skyflash.
Is the removal of those 2 Skyflash really worth the flightmodel increase justifying a jump of two BR steps in comparison?
Ariete slowly becoming good again?
Vehicle: Challenger 2 (base)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 ----> 11.3
Reason: It is one of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and should not be 0.3 BR lower than the extremely powerful top tier MBTs such as the 2A7V, 122 and BVM. It does not have the performance to justify it
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
Ground RB, VEXTRA 105 : 9.7 → 10.0+ with buffs.
As of now, the Vextra is missing its historically accurate shell and is using the OFL 105 F1 which was removed from service before the Vextra was even a thing. The addition of its historical round, the OFL 105 F2 (Community Bug Reporting System) would bring him a much better firepower, on par with what is found on other light/wheeled vehicles at the BR bracket. Giving it a better round would also make it a very decent vehicle even at top tier with the Leclerc lineups (the Vextra being the only usable light tank in the tech tree at top tier for France). Giving it a better round, and maybe it’s 3rd gen gunner thermal (Community Bug Reporting System), a better turning radius (Community Bug Reporting System) and a better reload (assisted loading : Community Bug Reporting System) would make it very usable and worth moving up to at the very least 10.0
A last benefit of making the Vextra 105 10.0 or above would be that it will open up the option for many over vehicles at the BR, including a rank 7 premium that France is still lacking to this day.
ARB, Buccaneer S.2B
10.7 > 10.3
should make the same BR like SU-25
both have 2 all-aspects missiles
The problem is CL-13, not F-86F40.I played F-86F40 and its performance is decent.
Dont you mean B7A2 (Homare 23) ryusei not “J7A2”? Well half of the kills are people not expecting a bomber attacking them. Higher br isnt fixing players ignorance. The games are barely different from regular Ryusei in tech tree since all both just boom zoom unexpecting planes only Homare engine has slightly better engine power.
Air Realistic Battles, A-5C 10.7 > 10.3.
This is a strike aircraft with similar performance to a Mig-19 platform with 2 rear-aspect only missiles, no guided air-ground armaments, very limited unguided armaments compared to the competition, limited countermeasures and a bad gun.
It is planned to be set at same BR as A-10A late which gets double the amount of IR missiles with competitive g-overload and all aspect seeker, guided air to ground armaments, variety of unguided armaments, modern HUD for better experience in simulator battles, large amount of countermeasures and a godly gun to shred your enemies.
This BR placement doesn’t make any sense. Please cancel the plan to up-tier it to 10.7.
Are you kidding? The F-16 doesn’t have AIM-9M, an HMD and unlimited countermeasures like the JAS39A does.
Vehicle: Challenger 2 TES
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 ----> 11.3
Reason: It is one of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and should not be 0.3 BR lower than the extremely powerful top tier MBTs such as the 2A7V, 122 and BVM. It does not have the performance to justify it. In addition, it is heavier and slower than all other Challenger 2s and has overall worse performance
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
Vehicle: Challenger 2 OES
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 ----> 11.3
Reason: It is one of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and should not be 0.3 BR lower than the extremely powerful top tier MBTs such as the 2A7V, 122 and BVM. It does not have the performance to justify it. In addition, it is heavier and slower than all other Challenger 2s and has overall worse performance
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one.
Vehicle: Challenger 2F
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 ----> 11.3
Reason: It is one of the weakest tanks at top tier currently and should not be 0.3 BR lower than the extremely powerful top tier MBTs such as the 2A7V, 122 and BVM. It does not have the performance to justify it. In addition, it is heavier and slower than all other Challenger 2s and has overall worse performance
Alternative solution: FIX THE CHALLENGER 2!
Me who plays ariete and planned to grind merkavas: great
Me who plays CR2 and VT4(one used to have the edge of ROF, one is plagued by the problem of ROF): oh no!
Each country’s main battle tank has received a 5-6.5 second increase in firing rate, while China’s main battle tanks still use a 7.1 second loading time and 577mm penetration depth steel spikes? How long has it been since the anti-fragmentation lining and ammunition loader enhancements for the 99 series tank were approved? Are they not ready for installation? The more modifications made to the 99A model, the larger the weaknesses in the frontal armor, isn’t it deliberately emptying the frontal armor? The driver’s thighs of the 99 series are sticking into their stomachs, and the waist angle is nearly 45 degrees, which is not a deliberate modification to empty the frontal armor? How can a normal human drive a vehicle in this sitting position? And now only the 99A model has been corrected, do the other 99 models not need correction?