Oh god I’m about to annihilate at 12.7 with the M4K
The F-16A might be worth it now too
Oh god I’m about to annihilate at 12.7 with the M4K
The F-16A might be worth it now too
Mig-21 - 11.0, MiG-23 - 11.0, F-16 - 12.7
Meanwhile: A-10C - 11.3, Su-25T/Su-39 - 11.7, Su-25SM3 - 12.3
Bruuuuuh… I don’t know what you’re smoking, but give me some.
This one is recent,… even if we agree, they won’t be doing anything this time.
One vehicle per post.
Please re-check initial post.
Thank you
and yet again sim is just ignored. :/
My suggestions for ARB:
Vehicle: Ki-44-II hei
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change: 3.7 ----> 4.7
Reason: This vehicle has outrageous climb rate, acceleration and superior maneuverability. with last update it’s firepower is decent now.
Merkava 3/4 reload buff
While it is nice to see that, I do think survivability buff would be even more appreciated as firepower is already non issue when you can bring gun to bear. And lets be realistic, average player struggles with surviving first.
while the f-4B/D isn’t in game it should be
Tier change
Naval Z43 - 4.7, Tier II > Tier III
In fact all 4.7’s to Tier III including the US DDs, USSR Tashenk. It’s a mess at the moment.
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.1
Gamemode: Air Realistic & Air Sim
BR Change: Air Realistic remain at 8.7. Air Sim 9.0 -----> 8.7.
Rank Change: Rank VI ----> Rank V
Reason: This change would enable the Buccaneer S1 to get its Air Spawn back. Unlike even later Bucs, it has a notably weaker flight performance and absolutely no A2A performance (No AAMs and no CMs). It is extremely vulnerable to any attack and rarely if ever can make it to a base to drop its bomb on target. Lowering its Rank to V would enable air spawn and fix a LOT of issues for the Buc S1
I get no one plays naval and therefore it can be neglected without anyone batting an eye, but come on.
M1128 both are in 9.3 in ground AB now but your genius table says it 10.0 now and you are want to up it to 10.3. What?
Rooikat 105 is 9.0 in AB now but your table says it 9.3 and you want to move it to 9.7. What?(2)
Oddly enough, there is a navy skin for it already! The VF-84 jolly rogers skin for the F-4C. VF-84 did operate B-models, so it would be more historical to change F-4C to B model
Bruh, literally 99% are top tier changes. Just proves how little gaijin cares of low mid tiers. Meanwhile Japanese ground low mid tier without lineups and overtiered crying in the corner. And zero players fighting people ±200 km/h faster planes than them.
GRB, PUMA. 10.0>9.7. The extremely slow weapon fire rate is completely unable to cause timely and effective damage to enemy targets, and the weak survivability can only sit and wait for death after being attacked
Moving up everything the same interval doesnt decompress
RB
F-86F-40 (japan/china, its the same plane): 9.0 → 8.7
The Canadair CL13B Mk6 is at the same BR and is a direct upgrade with a much stronger engine, these don’t belong at the same BR.
Me. 262C-2 8.0 → 7.7
The only reason this have higher BR are rocket boosters
Reorganization of high tier SPAAs(GRB)
Pantsir-S1: 12.0
I mean, I dont need to say much.
ITO 90M(FR/SWE), XM1069 ADATS: 11.7
ITO 90Ms are between a place that its not as good as the pantsir, but also much more desirable than other SPAAs at the same BR. The bradley ADATS has better mobility and autocannon compared to the British one.
TOR-M1, FlaRakRad, 2K22M Tunguska, M113 ADATS: 11.3
They all have flaws here or there. The TOR is incapable of dealing with close-in aircrafts, flarakrad only has 2 rounds, the tunguska has a mid missile and the ADATS lacks an autocannon compared to the US one.
OTOMATIC, type 81C: 11.0
Lacks competitiveness to engage manuvering fixed wing, and in the case of latter, engage helicopters.