While it is nice to see that, I do think survivability buff would be even more appreciated as firepower is already non issue when you can bring gun to bear. And lets be realistic, average player struggles with surviving first.
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.1
Gamemode: Air Realistic & Air Sim
BR Change: Air Realistic remain at 8.7. Air Sim 9.0 -----> 8.7.
Rank Change: Rank VI ----> Rank V
Reason: This change would enable the Buccaneer S1 to get its Air Spawn back. Unlike even later Bucs, it has a notably weaker flight performance and absolutely no A2A performance (No AAMs and no CMs). It is extremely vulnerable to any attack and rarely if ever can make it to a base to drop its bomb on target. Lowering its Rank to V would enable air spawn and fix a LOT of issues for the Buc S1
M1128 both are in 9.3 in ground AB now but your genius table says it 10.0 now and you are want to up it to 10.3. What?
Rooikat 105 is 9.0 in AB now but your table says it 9.3 and you want to move it to 9.7. What?(2)
Oddly enough, there is a navy skin for it already! The VF-84 jolly rogers skin for the F-4C. VF-84 did operate B-models, so it would be more historical to change F-4C to B model
Bruh, literally 99% are top tier changes. Just proves how little gaijin cares of low mid tiers. Meanwhile Japanese ground low mid tier without lineups and overtiered crying in the corner. And zero players fighting people ±200 km/h faster planes than them.
GRB, PUMA. 10.0>9.7. The extremely slow weapon fire rate is completely unable to cause timely and effective damage to enemy targets, and the weak survivability can only sit and wait for death after being attacked
Pantsir-S1: 12.0
I mean, I dont need to say much.
ITO 90M(FR/SWE), XM1069 ADATS: 11.7
ITO 90Ms are between a place that its not as good as the pantsir, but also much more desirable than other SPAAs at the same BR. The bradley ADATS has better mobility and autocannon compared to the British one.
TOR-M1, FlaRakRad, 2K22M Tunguska, M113 ADATS: 11.3
They all have flaws here or there. The TOR is incapable of dealing with close-in aircrafts, flarakrad only has 2 rounds, the tunguska has a mid missile and the ADATS lacks an autocannon compared to the US one.
OTOMATIC, type 81C: 11.0
Lacks competitiveness to engage manuvering fixed wing, and in the case of latter, engage helicopters.
SIDAM (Mistral) 9.7-9.3
The SIDAM is comparable to the Machbet and ZSU-23-4M4 with some downsides, like it lacking thermals, having no ability to lock targets at night and no search radar. Yet it sits at an isolated BR with no lineup and out of place of its contemporaries.
Challenger 2/2F/ OES/TES going to 11.7? Like they were at a spot where they were high enough to not suffer and not be too low have any impact on downtiers. same with the challenger mk.3, vickers mk.7, rooikat 105, VFM5
Also the lynx and G-lynx going to Panstir territory is going to make that helicopter unplayable and the rooivalk going up just makes me cry
GRB, PUMA VJTF. 10.7>10.3. The extremely slow weapon fire rate is completely unable to cause timely and effective damage to enemy targets, and the weak survivability can only sit and wait for death after being attacked, and the extra spike launcher further reduces its survivability
Vehicle: B7A2 (Homare 23)
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change: 3.7 ----> 4.3
Reason: It’s superior maneuverablity and air spawn has made it broken in ARB. I have one B7A2 (homare23) myself and reached kd 2 ridiculously easy, didn’t even have to put my headphone on. I did have so much fun but I don’t think there is balance.