Arcade, OF-40 Mk.2A. 9.0>8.0. Not all that different from previous OF-40, just folder them together.
Arcade, P.7.T AA. 1.3>1.0. Bad guns that don’t seem to be all that effective at hitting planes, completely unarmored, atrociously low hp/tonne, kinda slow
RB, Su-27. 13.3 > 13.3. Do you realize that it will share BR with some non IR-ECCM carriers while carrying best IR and best semi-active missiles on top of that having a very potent flying model?
Ps: this does apply not only to Su-27, sugested it just as an example not to break rule, a loot of changes are questionable. Just decompress BR further to 14.3 or even 15.0.
1 Like
Arcade, AMC.35 (ACG.1). 1.3>1.0. Compare to A13 Mk II, worse shell selection, lower penetration, slower turret slew, slower reload, slightly better armor, less crew, lower horsepower per tonne, slower, lower visibility. Categorically worse in all respects, there is nowhere it excels in its own BR.
Arcade, E.B.R. (1951). 4.3>3.7. Offers no improvement to firepower over AMX-13 (FL11), worse armor, lower horsepower per tonne, only speed.
3 Likes
Arcade, FIAT 6614. 6.7>6.3. Vulnerable to even smallest mg fire, slow turret slew rate which leaves it unable to take full advantage of the speed and high penetration, which is the only thing it has going for it
Only after sending that did i actually think of a different approach. I mostly sent it on account of the abysmal stock grind. It should stay 10.3, yes, but with a change in stock weapons: AIM-9Bs replaced by AIM-9Ps, and deletion of AIM-9B modification. I intend to make a suggestion to change a wide range of stock aircraft weapons to make stock aircraft more competitive in the future.
Regarding F-104G (RoC), it has no reason being at 10.7, unless it gains CM pods.
Arcade, C13 T90. 7.0>6.7. lackluster HEATFS and slow reload offers nothing particularly compelling about this vehicle
Arcade, AUBL/74. 6.3>6.0 lackluster HEATFS and slow reload offers nothing particularly compelling about this vehicle
Arcade, B1 bis. 2.3>2.0, extremely vulnerable from sides and no aiming reticule for 75mm cannon (which fires the only APHE that the tank has access to [and the only HE with enough filler to overpressure?]) makes it of questionable utility
2 Likes
While the Surmpanzer sits at 1.0 right?? lol
Arcade, M113A1 (TOW). 8.3>7.3. thin armor, exposed gunner, bad handling, just an all around sucky ATMC
Arcade, M36B1. 5.7>5.3. Compare to M36B2 at same BR, which possesses very similar firepower on a lower profile chassis with similar turret armor and (after accounting for higher slope on the M36B1) only slightly diminished hull armor and speed
With the Merkava and Ariete getting 5 second reload, why can’t the Challenger 3TD get them as well?
And the 5 second reload was the only special thing going for the Challenger 2s. Now it’s no longer special when more tanks are getting it. It’s either they increase the capacity of the ready rack or reduce the reload for Challenger 2 to 4-4.5 seconds as we seen on YT videos of loaders doing lap loading.
3 Likes
un related to the f16 but why isnt the pantsir going up in br it is buy far the best anti air
1 Like
Here’s me saying that the Sturmpanzer should go up in BR too:
That is BS, J-8F has far better FM. But moving planes +/- 0.3 right now is meaningless anyway, you will break one or the other. BR cap has to increase.
J-8F? Good flight model?
What world are you living in, it’s an extremely fat MiG-21MF and turns like one.
i have like 300 games in the HSTV-L it should spall more due to larger calibre, the HSTV-L is defo better, faster, better chasis and armour + survivability
You suggest a tank with 31mm penetrating HE shell to go higher than a tank with 61mm penetrating HE shell. Both are fine where they are, both are one trick ponies. The Chi-Ha 12cm was already put at 2.3 years ago and it didn’t work out, granted that was before the HE reword, but still it was borderline useless, right now at 1.7 it’s at least a tank you take out for some fun with the Ro-Go 12cm & Ho-Ro 15cm.