Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Lol the adats is pretty mid against air.

Idk the Adats is hit or miss, i had my Type 10 tank 3 missiles before i killed the Canadian one. Though other times ive been killed instantly, honestly im more afraid of the 2S6 with how blinding those guns are.

Those missiles lose control so easily lol

1 Like

I did not mention it because it is considered one of the worst top tier AA.

Its like the pantsir and the ADATS had a kid. Its got the pantsir level radar and such but those missiles lose control very easily past 8km

This is one of the most astounishing quote I have saw on this post til date. Whatever has been discussed on the post, you have not played them.
Most people straight up gave up playing the tree. It is either the most tryhard britbongs or the enjoyer of shit tanks.

2 Likes

I am saying this because it is the only viable AA compared to that machine. Also for AH Mk.1, it is somehow harder to kill than flarakrad or pantsirs.

Yeah like 6-8km and your missiles already barely pull anymore.

AMX A1 is worse than all migs, A-10 and F5. Why is it still on 11.3???

1 Like

Okay? The only viable helis imo are F&F wirh current spaa and they are map dependent. Regardless most ITO’s cant use radar on most maps as they can be seen from enemy spawn lol, aside from that its not a good spaa. For top tier the only reliable way is to spawn a fightwr and go toe to tow in the air.

In my opinion the new Puma VJTF shouldn’t get uptiered to 11.0 instead it should stay in the br it still is because for example Vilkas is like a puma on wheels and same atgms but at a lower br even tho its getting uptiered this update

So in conclusion the Puma VJTF doesnt move up in br and the Vilkas does so they are in the same br also since there iterally isnt any 10.7/11.0 tank for germany

Vilkas 10.3>10.7 Ground Realistic
Puma VJTF 10.7 Ground Realistic

3 Likes

Agreed it should stay 10.6 with the current new lineup

Can’t go up if MiG-21bis all goes down…kinda same problem than F-8U-2 which will be sucked in MiG-21Bis revival.

13.0 or 12.7 with rb99s would be elite need a early fox3 carrier for Sweden and like you said there isn’t much of a difference from the c to the d

1 Like

Comparing an attacker to several fighter… great job within the community.

The only A-10 being, is way slower and doesn’t have your acceleration ability.

Yet i agree that AMX A1 isn’t good for Air superiority purposes, but hey you’re not having to do that role.

The problem is losing the C would suck as it fills a good spot for sweden rn. Maybe if gaijin ever actually did any research on swedish vehicle the TT wouldnt be such a mess of vehicle with wrong stats or missing equipment.

1 Like

The Sea Vixen is a rat plane typically flown by bad and medicore players that ruins 7.7 and 8.0 lobbies.

It’s the XP-50 but at a higher tier. People that play both repetitively typically have negative K:D in everything else they touch.

It should consistently be fighting things that can catch/kill it, not harrassing 8.0 lobbies.

1 Like

Honestly, none of the spike IFVs should move up. The namer 30 should definitely stay lower than the Puma VJTF and the KF41 should stay the same BR (or also move lower).

So they should all stay the same BR.

Ground Realistic: M26, M26 (T99): 6.7 → 6.3

The M26 and its T99 variant sit at the same BR as the M26E1, T26E-1 and T26E5. All three of these vehicles are far superior, having either better armour, firepower, or both whilst having similar mobility. The M26 and M26 (T99) are far more comparable to the Tigers and Panthers of 6.0 than the Tiger IIs and T34s of 6.7.

2 Likes

13.0 at the lowest.