Why do Leopard 2A4M and M1A1 AIM both still have KE-W if M1A1 HC gets M829A2 and Leopard 2 PL gets DM53?
2 Likes
Viggen has no HMS so you’re kinda screwed regardless.
1 Like
:(
Time to get a Time Machine and convince them to put a HMS on it
Or get gaijin to actually decompress BR’s. Tbf they could add RB28 (cope but i can only hope)
1 Like
Wym doa the ja37d is already in the game. The Ja37d may also be able to get the rb74m so it would only buff the plane. The plane already faces top tier planes in a up-tier. Also Sweden needs more ARH carrier aircraft.
1 Like
It already faces f-16s also the sky flash is so horrible that’s why it should get the rb99 and possibly the rb74m. Has good rwr, radar, and cm count.
1 Like
Because it never mounted RB74M? It makes more sense so get RB28 since its domestic. Besides gaijin is more likely to add the JA37Di as a prem. As for DOA 13.0 with the new BR changes it will be worthless.
Also good RWR? Thats a joke right? The JA37D is alright but if i wanted to play another BnZ fighter id go play the F.3, the JA37D has its place where it is now and the Di should be added to carry ARH when they decompress everything, for now id rather we get a Danish/Norwegian F16A, and the DK/NOR F16 MLU. They would help bring in more diversity for top tier and their combined vehicles could really fill out the 5th air line sweden is missing and help fill a ton of gaps considering gaijin didnt even try to do that with Finland considering its one of the poorly represented subtrees added.
Ground Battles, Pantsir S1. 11.7>12.7. This vehicle outclasses all other SPAA at its same BR right now.
Ground Battles, M1A2 SEP, M1A2 SEP V2. 12.0>11.7.
T-90M, Leopard 2A7V, 122B+, have better armor, firepower, and spall liners. There’s no way the Abram’s are as good as those tanks in game…
Ground Battles, A-10C. 12.0>11.3. There’s no way the slow A-10 which can carry 4 Mavs (should be allowed in game to equip 6 with the T-Pod.) should face advanced ARH A/A missiles and the Pantsir.
3 Likes
Ground RB, Ariete PSO, (11.3 → 11.0), this tank not so long ago recieved weight fix, now it weights 57 t with stock kit and 59 t with PSO tipo 2 kit. It makes the mobility of this variant worse than for other Ariete tanks. At the same time addon armor only adds insignificant protection of sides, which can only help in some situations against autocannons. The frontal armor profile is still the same as on Ariete (P) at 10.3 (10.7 new), which is already weak for that br.
Comments: reload rate remains unchanged, DM53 is changed to previously available CL3143.
PS: currently there is no need to force this tank to stay at higher br as the Italian tech tree already have enough top tier tanks in a form of Ariete AMV and 2A7HU. While there is still place for future additions (Centauro 2, AMV PT2 and etc).
1 Like
Plane - Su-25/k
Mode - GRB
BR - 10.0 → 10.3
It has 256 flares/chaff so can use CM series while over the BF which nothing else 10.0 and lower can do, has one of the best damge models in the game, has 10km guided missiles and lots of cannon rounds as well as 2 all aspect missiles. The noob premium line up is going to 10.3 anyway so might as well put it up, it wont annoye the masses of noobs too much.
1 Like
Ground RB, Ariete, (11.3 → 11.3), The frontal armor profile is still the same as on Ariete (P) at 10.3 (10.7 new), which is already weak for that br. While the installation of WAR addon kit provides insignificant protection against kinetic munitions (less than Kontankt-1) at the same time making the tank 5.5 t heavier, tank basically doesn’t get any protection increase, but gets major reduction of mobility with 59.5 t overall weight.
Comments: reload rate remains unchanged, DM53 is changed to previously available CL3143.
PS: currently there is no need to force this tank to stay at higher br as the Italian tech tree already have enough top tier tanks in a form of Ariete AMV and 2A7HU. While there is still place for future additions (Centauro 2, AMV PT2 and etc).
3 Likes
Panstir should 100% be moved up and the 2s6 should be the same br as the adats as they preform similarly and the 2s38 should be the same br as the HSTVL. Idk if there’s any saving US top tier ground new rounds on the HC and Click bait will 100% help players who are experienced but won’t change much for people who play casually
3 Likes
Cough SLAMRAAM cough
Give those CAS dudes something to fear.
IRIS-T on tracked launcher, Skyranger 30/35 (with air bursting ammunition) SHORAD/MSHORAD, etc would all be a huge step
2S38 should not be the same br as the HSTV-L, the HSTV-L is a much better chasis with a better time to kill, it has more pen and spalls more, 75 vs 57 the advantages of the 2S38 are LWS, thermals and APCBC, which does not warrant same br as HSTV-L
2 Likes
Ground RB, Leclerc (series), 11.7 > 12.0. BUT Add SHARD or re-evaluate penetration of current APFSDS. The Leclerc at this point, even with the improved reload speed, still has yet to meet parity of other MBTs. The improved reload of several other MBTs means that the speed of the autoloader is no longer a fixed advantage. Increased details in modeling has been a good change overall, but this means that not having a manual loader no-longer means that your reload is never impacted, and in-fact requires a repair if struck. The armor scheme currently remains very lack-luster compared to its peers, and the mobility is limited in its employment due to map design. Helping the penetration would bring some degree of fairness for the Leclerc series against many of its opponents.
6 Likes
Would be an elite add on but would it compare to the panstir
I can tell you have not played the hstvl that much. The post pen on the 2s38 is 10000% better it has way more ammo faster fire rate, better thermals, and LWS, remote turret. The round on the hstvl has more pen but is so little that it doesn’t make a difference. the hstvl is smaller and more maneuverable but that doesn’t justify the br difference.
1 Like
Ground RB- M26 (T99): 6.7->6.3.
The M26 (T99) sits at the same BR as the M26E1, T26E-1 and T26E5. All three of these vehicles are far superior, having either better armour, firepower, or both whilst having similar mobility. The M26 (T99) is far more comparable to the Tigers and Panthers of 6.0 than the Tiger IIs and T34s of 6.7. Furthermore, its rocket racks act as external ammo and can be easily detonated, making it arguably weaker even than the regular M26. However, both should go down to 6.3 in GRB.
2 Likes
Plane - F-1
Mode - GRB
BR - 10.3 → 9.7
Dosnt have any stand off weponary, not a great FM anyway, no flares/chaff, and limited ground attack abilty compared to competitors ie (Mig-23BN, A-4E early, Ayit) also Japan need something crediable at 9.7 as T-2 does not cut it and should go down to 9.3 for GRB
2 Likes