Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Ground RB, M1 and M1KVT, add M833 ammo.

These tanks will be getting a BR increase to 10.7 and should have an ammo improvement to match. M774 currently has ~372mm of armor pen while M833 has 395mm. meanwhile all the opposition that the M1’s face all use rounds which have higher penetration than 400mm of armor and some tanks at the same BR or earlier have even higher pen reaching penetration values into the 500’s. If the M1 is going to be getting up-tiered to 11.7 (which is a common occurrence), it needs to have a more adequate ammunition to fight it’s opposition.

1 Like

They are at 11.3, no 10.3 should ever have to see a 9m behind them knowing they only have 60 medium countermeasures. It would take at least 20 for an f104, maybe even 30 just to get rid of one. The a10c shouldnt be competitive at its br, its a strike aircraft not a fucking fighter.

1 Like

Still too many.
Ideally (at least from my experience over the past 4+ years) you should just look behind you about once every 20 or 30 seconds and only release a flare when you see the red diamond marker on the missile.

Probably this?

It simply is not so.
Even if I play at 9.0 BR, full uptier is a bit rare, mostly 8.3-9.3 or 8.7-9.7 BR games most of the time.
Probably the time difference may also have something to do with it.

It doesn’t like that?

Play 10 rounds 9.0-11.0BR then come back here.

Nobody asked you for your ridiculous opinion caused by your skill issue.

2 Likes

Id guess the F-14 has a superior radar to the Mig-29s but inferior radar to pretty much everything else.

1 Like

I’m all for it if the BR decompression is done right.
what I would suggest is that Ground vehicles are pushed up even more than 12.0
for example Leopard 2A5 and 2A7 are the same br.
Many vehicles are inferior like this example but they sit at the same BR.
That should not be the case and I would suggest taking the ground vehicles to be raised in BR. up to 12.7 same as the CAS jets are in this game mode.

This is the only valid argument for strike plane BR in Air RB.

1 Like

There is a difference between competitive and playable.

11.3 its probably too strong, but 12.0/12.3, id fear it would move beyond playable and into unplayable.

in the absence of a better RB gamemode for CAS aircraft such as RB EC. Then Strike aircraft of all kinds should be at a minimum, at a fair and playable BR in ARB.

For now, Id guess 11.7 for A-10C on the ground you have many other IRCCM aircraft at 11.7.

1 Like

who the fuck are you lmfao.

nobody requested you to reply, if you didn’t reply this wouldn’t be a KM long thread. You reacted, everything after is on you.

What?

Why are you taking 9.0 to equation? we’re talking about 10.7.

No, other document, not this one. I forgot where.

You’re just not insecure enough/not employing your flare optimally/not taking advantage of how easy it is for seeker to lose lock in all stages.

support you.poor 99a

Not really, the mirages are stuck at 12.0 due to magic 2s. The a10c has mhd, maw, 480flares/chaff, a 30mm gau, 4 9ms and acts like a zero. All it takes is a fly by and you have a 9m on your ass. All gaijin has to do to fix this is make it so thier are ai targets all across the map and not all in one centre like a fucking spastic to sort on strike aircraft.

They could finally be at thier own br doing thier job while fighters go at it centre stage defending them.

“I don’t much care to listen to players (who usually aren’t that good) who clearly want the vehicles of their nation to stay at a favorable, or overpowered, BR so that they can keep clubbing in it”

This is a better translation.

Q-5s go up in air RB! Massive disagree to all (including the A-5C). Those jets are not equal to a harrier, has no AA missiles and can’t even solo a base (some of them)!

3 Likes

All of the Q5’s and the A5C can take 2 or more bases using napalm bombs. The lack of missiles is a problem though.

psst

MiG-21Bis’ should not go down to 11.0, if the J-7D and the Mig-21SMT and MF stays on their current BR! The Bis is much more advanced to be only 0.3 BR higher or to be equal to the J-7D

4 Likes

Su17M2 MUST go down too, as no flare-less plane should be on 10.7!

2 Likes

9.7 is stretching it, and 10.0 is way too high. It definitely shouldn’t be 0.3 below the turms.

Normalerweise machen sie eine veränderter Tabelle mit den Veränderungen und denn beschweren wir und denn nach 7-10 Tage realisieren sie die Änderungen. (Endschuldigung für Fehler, ich lerne Deutsch)

1 Like

Yeah. The Bis is more than 0.3 better than an MF, it has much better performance, while also having much better missiles.

And still no proposed changes for the Harrier frs1.

1 Like

I’m just good old Gen’1 jet enjoyer.

Yeah, you keep posting things that are either made up or just wrong without any valid rebuttal?

You said or implied that 10.0 would draw a number of down tier games.

My point is, unless a BR cap such as the 2019 9.7BR exists, the frequency of up-tier and down-tier will depend quite significantly on the time difference and the squadmates vehicles.

In fact, in several BRs, depending on the combination of countries in the squad, 99% of the games will get either full down tier or a full uptier games.

As an example, if you take Germany (or France) + Japan as squadmates, the nations you will face as enemies will be America + Russia + Sweden or Italy, and most of their games are 8.3-9.3 or 8.0-9.0.

Same goes with 11.0, 11.3 or 12.3 before BR decompression as well.

In 12.3, If you squadded with France + Japan, you could gets full down tier games many times.
Not sure 12.3 full down tier squad is still works after decompression.

At least I have a good time with that in most of the time at past few years.

2 Likes