Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Heilcopter - MI-24D (USSR/Italy)
Mode - GRB
BR - 8.7 → 9.0

The same BR as the MI-24A but gets a RWR (very usefull), Flares/Chaff and a IRCM module

I think so

One more inconsistency : the french (Dutch) sea fury needs to be in the benelux line.

Average GNDM Panzer response (he loves to type of “laughs” (ha ha) like an edgy teenager to posts he disagrees with)

Regardless, suggesting moving 2S38 to 11.7; and getting 7 hearts is something typical for this forum, unfortunately.

The Rooikat MTTD goes to 9.3 and gets DM33 just like the Rooikat 105 which is already at 9.3

So now please give both Type 16 (P) & Type 16 (FPS), both at 9.3 their Type 93 APFSDS shot too, M735 is unusable.

M735 is getting looked at again hopefully to undo the fake stats it was given

Nobody says this. A pop or two every 10 seconds is the realistic assumption.

none of these matters. it’s the rate where missile track for afterbuner and flare. both have the same number. I can’t remember where I’ve seen it but PL-5B and Magic shares equal flare track rate with magic. IE they seek flare at higher rate than Afterbuner by 2x.

because There’s more game of me being uptiered to 11.7 than there is me staying in 10.7-11.3 range with any of my 11.0 jets. simple as. 10.0 - 10.3 is the BR that sticks together, while everything above is the uptier prone BR.

You’re the one saying that. I said it exist.

Nobody asked your opinion on how this plane BR should be handled either. it’s such a non-issue to begin with but you just have the need to be the all-knowing.

okay Pro. show your earning from this game if it’s so important to be good. you must be swimming in WT earned cash if you’re emphasizing on skill this much.

1 Like

Ground RB, XM8, 9.3-> 11.0 add M900 ammo.

This vehicle was the later evolution of the CCVL and it is from the 90’s. Currently it has older ammo (M774) than what the CCVL uses (M833). It doesn’t make sense that the newer vehicle uses the older ammo type. M900 was also produced in the early 90’s so the XM8 would be using that ammo type.

We know how long these “we’re looking at takes”.
Regardless, no Type 16 ever fired M735 as Type 93 was specifically made for the JSW 105 cannon, which was to be mounted on the Type 16s.

Its nowhere better revising them tbh, just give the premium type 16 a type 93

1 Like

Interesting idea, not sure about the feasibility of it but its at least better than other people saying the a10s should stay at the brs thier at to stay competitive in air rb… a strike aircraft be competitive against fighters…

Type 93 should at the very least be given to the FPS version and better for the TT one as well. I dont think a revised M735 would be much better.

1 Like

谁玩中戏我笑谁😅

3 Likes

image
what the hell…? So nerfing red tops into the ground werent enough, you had to uptier vixen just for sakes of it…

1 Like

The CCVL has a commander sight and thermals for the commander, which is something that the XM8 lacks. So it makes sence that the XM8 is a lower BR.

I propose adding the AAM-3 to the F-4EJ Kai to maintain its BR, as it does not have the all-aspect AIM-9L. Otherwise, it would be relatively disadvantaged, so it is desirable to lower the BR.

Air RB, Buccaneer s2, 9.3>9.0 (after the removal of ccip). ccrp is notoriously inconsistent with its acuracy and sometimes doesnt even drop the bombs at all. With the removal of its ccip it should go down to 9.0 in ground at the very least as it would no longer be able to bomb targets on the move without commiting to getting close within spaa range. In air the lack of ccip wont hamper it as much however the terrible ccrp will make bombing bases at any altitude unfeasable while you have tails on you such as the f104 and other super sonics.

3 Likes

Sounds like an asinine take but, I mean…it’s a take. “I don’t much care to listen to the people who play it”. Weird.

GRB Type 81 11.3 > 11.7 If we keep it at 11.3 amount of them in battles will be increased significantly, cos of Type 90 lineup.
Needless to say it’s very toxic SPAA, especially with dominating of shity weaher.

The problem is AAM-3 have a chance to be fixed making them even better than 9ms, and i dont think something like that could be bellow 12.7 on a phantom air frame. And gaijin would most likely put it at 13.0.