Interesting idea, not sure about the feasibility of it but its at least better than other people saying the a10s should stay at the brs thier at to stay competitive in air rb… a strike aircraft be competitive against fighters…
Type 93 should at the very least be given to the FPS version and better for the TT one as well. I dont think a revised M735 would be much better.
1 Like
谁玩中戏我笑谁😅
3 Likes
what the hell…? So nerfing red tops into the ground werent enough, you had to uptier vixen just for sakes of it…
1 Like
The CCVL has a commander sight and thermals for the commander, which is something that the XM8 lacks. So it makes sence that the XM8 is a lower BR.
I propose adding the AAM-3 to the F-4EJ Kai to maintain its BR, as it does not have the all-aspect AIM-9L. Otherwise, it would be relatively disadvantaged, so it is desirable to lower the BR.
Air RB, Buccaneer s2, 9.3>9.0 (after the removal of ccip). ccrp is notoriously inconsistent with its acuracy and sometimes doesnt even drop the bombs at all. With the removal of its ccip it should go down to 9.0 in ground at the very least as it would no longer be able to bomb targets on the move without commiting to getting close within spaa range. In air the lack of ccip wont hamper it as much however the terrible ccrp will make bombing bases at any altitude unfeasable while you have tails on you such as the f104 and other super sonics.
3 Likes
Sounds like an asinine take but, I mean…it’s a take. “I don’t much care to listen to the people who play it”. Weird.
GRB Type 81 11.3 > 11.7 If we keep it at 11.3 amount of them in battles will be increased significantly, cos of Type 90 lineup.
Needless to say it’s very toxic SPAA, especially with dominating of shity weaher.
The problem is AAM-3 have a chance to be fixed making them even better than 9ms, and i dont think something like that could be bellow 12.7 on a phantom air frame. And gaijin would most likely put it at 13.0.
They have already answered this before. man in the loop system will not be added, and i believe they have a good reason for it not to be added. If you could control the missile, you could just launch it behind a mountain, fly the missile over a mountain and hit ground targets, you would literally be untouchable and it would be THE STRONGEST plane in the game.
Ground RB, XM1 GM/C, 9.3, give them M774.
XM774 was in development at the same time of the XM1’s development and they would have been tested and used for the platform.
2 Likes
Doesn’t it have a far weaker radar than everything else at that BR? Still, not the same or comparable set of missiles. An F-14A/B doesn’t need to be that high. At least not without some upgrade with 9Ms or 120s but neither ever received them (as far as I know). Sitting higher than an F-16 and Su-27? Terrible move.
Alongside an uptier to at least 9.7 if not 10.0.
1 Like
AAM-3 at 12.7 is good. it’s a phantom without DF slats, it’s only positive thing is APG-66 and 4 7F.
Yes, i agrea. the problem is they make us keep it and only give us a 6km lock range for tanks? At the very minimum give us a 10km range to lock onto tanks or give us 4. we dont even use the mf data link pod anyway.
100% this. People here are acting like the 9M is utterly game breaking. It’s not. Not even close.
1 Like
it need to, that plane is space maker 101. they disrupt enemy formation and enable the team to commit into a higher risk move because the enemy is at disadvantage, position, altitude and speed wise.
I wouldnt call the apg-66 a positive, the thing hates to lock onto things but when it does it does keep it reasonably well. Its just a pain to use.
using it in F-16, it’s relatively well-performing for me, need the ACM mode to makes it lock the right target though.