Yak-9UT 5.7 → 5.3
So far I do not see that it is strong enough for 5.7. Anyway, the Yak-3U and the Yak-9UT are too different, I have not had the pleasure of seeing them in the same rating. We have Spitfire Griffons on 6.7, they fights against jets! This plane shouldn’t and can’t fight as Yak-3U. But for Yak-3U seeing Griffons is normal when uptier. I think it is in justice. If once community asked for lowering BR for Yak-3U to 5.7 I wonder why they not lowered Yak-9UT too? It has worse rate of climb.
“Why not 5.0?” — because I wish to leave 4.0 untouched. Also we even have Yak-9P on 5.0. Even switching rating slightly it’ll become in balance. Don’t know, may be thing in farm. To prevent it from future BR increasing (since people prefers use balanced vehicles) Gaijin can lower Yak-3UT’s farm of 10%. Yak-3U and Yak-9UT should not have same rating and farm. Naturally I’m just suggesting, think of it Gaijin.
How is the AGS going up AGAIN without getting the m900 shell? <400m of pen on a 5 second reload at 11.3? Make it make sense.
Leopard 2 pl gets DM53 but not 2A4M at the same br with worse turret armour?
Thats a whole other story but i see your point.
However the Griffon spitfires also should not be fighting jets and are slightly overtiered the MK.24 should be 6.3 and the MK.22 6.0 I think.
To be fair that missile is absolutely disgusting, however air wise it’s not really a factor. The lowest the A-10C should be is 12.0
Su-7s should stay where they are! Those planes have no flares and their only advantage is speed, other than that it flys like a bus, but still the F-104s are faster so…
- it already faces all aspect missiles.
Air Realistic, A-10C . 11.3 > 11.7/12.0. AIM-9M’s do not deserve to be this low considering what it fights has barely any flares or no flares at all.
Ground RB, M60A3 TTS (US), 9.0, add M833.
All the tanks within this same BR range of 9.0-9.3 all use either DM33 or DM63. While the M60A3 TTS was a later version of the M60 and could indeed fire M900, for balance reasons it should be equipped with M833 to better match it with its opposition.
examples:
(9.3) Leopard 1A5’s use DM33 (408mm pen)
(9.3) Leopard A1A1 (L/44) uses 120mm DM13 (393mm pen)
(9.0) Class 3 P uses DM33
(9.0) TAM 2IP uses DM33
(9.3) M48 Super uses DM33
(9.0-9.3)Type-74E, F, G use Type93 (405 pen)
(9.3) CM11 uses DM63 (430mm pen)
(9.3) STRV 105 uses DM63
(9.3) Olifant mk.2 uses DM63
(9.3) Magach 7C uses DM63
(9.3) Magach Gal Batash uses DM63
(9.3) Merkava 1’s and 2’s use DM33
(9.3) T-64’s and T-72’s use 3BM22 (422mm pen)
(9.3) ZTZ-96 uses Type 1985-I (466mm pen) ← highest penning round of 9.3 btw
(9.3) AMX-32 (120) uses OFL 120 G1 (394mm pen)
(9.0) Chieftain mk.10 uses Shot L23 (410mm pen)
Meanwhile the M60A3 TTS gets M774 that only pens 372mm when it used M833 and M900 historically.
Sea Harrier FRS.1 should go down to 11.0 do ti uses the GR.3’s engine and airframe; and the new AV-8B premium is and the A-10C outclasses it “by a mile” as an attacker or even as a fighter!
Please upvote:
I think the f4s phantom II should be 12 br -» to 11.7 again due to it getting up tier very easily and it becomes difficult to compete against the f16 and many more planes
Not a bad start. Nice to see that something is actually being done. I would still suggest that the maximum BR be increased to maybe 15.0 for planes and 14.7ish for tanks. that way it leaves room for vehicles in the middle tiers to move around more once y’all get around to decompressing that area.
Nur Mut zur Lücke.
Gratuliere, dass du etwas im Leben dazulernen möchtest in deinem Fall die deutsche Sprache.
Danke dür deine Erklärung.
Alles Gute.
Recent updates have made even his poor protection unreliable
Ground RB, LOSAT, 10.3–>9.3
The russian Khrizantima-S is at 9.7 and is a much more capable ATGM launcher. it can lock targets and through smoke and can lock on to low flying aircraft, has a moving launcher which allows it to aim up and down giving it many more options for positions it can fight from. it doesnt need a minimum engagement range as it fires HEAT type missiles. Can fire from hull down positions without exposing itself.
In comparison the LOSAT has kinetic missiles which need to reach a certain distance before they can become effective which limits where it can engage targets (lot of small maps, or maps with terrain features limiting engagements to short range).
The vehicle cant lock on to targets.
The launcher is fixed so it must be on mostly level ground otherwise the missile fires high and misses or shoots low into the ground further limiting its options for engagements.
Must expose itself to engage enemy targets.
By comparison the LOSAT is a far more situational vehicle yet has a higher BR than the much more capable Khrizantima-S.
More 1950s with the upgrades the 9.0 received. But ok.
The ex3.7 large costal boats that got nerfed to 4.0 (M-boat, Peacock-class, Albatos-class…) should go back to 3.7; do to those boats constantly getting uptiers on 4.0 and even the OP 4.3 boats (SKR, Köln, 206s, MPKs) are using those as free kills now!
Mode: Ground Realistic. T32E1. 7.7 > 7.3. It goes a full BR up for losing the MG port weakspot, with the same cannon and shells as the T32. It struggles very much to penetrate the other last heavies at 7.7 like IS-3, Conqueror, and Maus. If it were 7.3 it would have more breathing room, and be more attractive as a foldered vehicle.
Yes sir the a10c should be at least 11.7 or 12.0 br. Also the fbu2 should be at 10.0 that thing should be 10.7 or 11.0 it does have very good performance for the be to be competitive even at 11.0 br
How? The Leo 2K is going to 10.0 with less armor, same mobility, same gun handling and no thermals