“I don’t much care to listen to players (who usually aren’t that good) who clearly want the vehicles of their nation to stay at a favorable, or overpowered, BR so that they can keep clubbing in it”
This is a better translation.
Q-5s go up in air RB! Massive disagree to all (including the A-5C). Those jets are not equal to a harrier, has no AA missiles and can’t even solo a base (some of them)!
3 Likes
All of the Q5’s and the A5C can take 2 or more bases using napalm bombs. The lack of missiles is a problem though.
psst
MiG-21Bis’ should not go down to 11.0, if the J-7D and the Mig-21SMT and MF stays on their current BR! The Bis is much more advanced to be only 0.3 BR higher or to be equal to the J-7D
4 Likes
Su17M2 MUST go down too, as no flare-less plane should be on 10.7!
2 Likes
9.7 is stretching it, and 10.0 is way too high. It definitely shouldn’t be 0.3 below the turms.
Normalerweise machen sie eine veränderter Tabelle mit den Veränderungen und denn beschweren wir und denn nach 7-10 Tage realisieren sie die Änderungen. (Endschuldigung für Fehler, ich lerne Deutsch)
1 Like
Yeah. The Bis is more than 0.3 better than an MF, it has much better performance, while also having much better missiles.
And still no proposed changes for the Harrier frs1.
1 Like
I’m just good old Gen’1 jet enjoyer.
Yeah, you keep posting things that are either made up or just wrong without any valid rebuttal?
You said or implied that 10.0 would draw a number of down tier games.
My point is, unless a BR cap such as the 2019 9.7BR exists, the frequency of up-tier and down-tier will depend quite significantly on the time difference and the squadmates vehicles.
In fact, in several BRs, depending on the combination of countries in the squad, 99% of the games will get either full down tier or a full uptier games.
As an example, if you take Germany (or France) + Japan as squadmates, the nations you will face as enemies will be America + Russia + Sweden or Italy, and most of their games are 8.3-9.3 or 8.0-9.0.
Same goes with 11.0, 11.3 or 12.3 before BR decompression as well.
In 12.3, If you squadded with France + Japan, you could gets full down tier games many times.
Not sure 12.3 full down tier squad is still works after decompression.
At least I have a good time with that in most of the time at past few years.
2 Likes
Yak-9UT 5.7 → 5.3
So far I do not see that it is strong enough for 5.7. Anyway, the Yak-3U and the Yak-9UT are too different, I have not had the pleasure of seeing them in the same rating. We have Spitfire Griffons on 6.7, they fights against jets! This plane shouldn’t and can’t fight as Yak-3U. But for Yak-3U seeing Griffons is normal when uptier. I think it is in justice. If once community asked for lowering BR for Yak-3U to 5.7 I wonder why they not lowered Yak-9UT too? It has worse rate of climb.
“Why not 5.0?” — because I wish to leave 4.0 untouched. Also we even have Yak-9P on 5.0. Even switching rating slightly it’ll become in balance. Don’t know, may be thing in farm. To prevent it from future BR increasing (since people prefers use balanced vehicles) Gaijin can lower Yak-3UT’s farm of 10%. Yak-3U and Yak-9UT should not have same rating and farm. Naturally I’m just suggesting, think of it Gaijin.
2 Likes
How is the AGS going up AGAIN without getting the m900 shell? <400m of pen on a 5 second reload at 11.3? Make it make sense.
1 Like
Leopard 2 pl gets DM53 but not 2A4M at the same br with worse turret armour?
1 Like
Thats a whole other story but i see your point.
However the Griffon spitfires also should not be fighting jets and are slightly overtiered the MK.24 should be 6.3 and the MK.22 6.0 I think.
1 Like
To be fair that missile is absolutely disgusting, however air wise it’s not really a factor. The lowest the A-10C should be is 12.0
Su-7s should stay where they are! Those planes have no flares and their only advantage is speed, other than that it flys like a bus, but still the F-104s are faster so…
- it already faces all aspect missiles.
1 Like
Air Realistic, A-10C . 11.3 > 11.7/12.0. AIM-9M’s do not deserve to be this low considering what it fights has barely any flares or no flares at all.
4 Likes
Ground RB, M60A3 TTS (US), 9.0, add M833.
All the tanks within this same BR range of 9.0-9.3 all use either DM33 or DM63. While the M60A3 TTS was a later version of the M60 and could indeed fire M900, for balance reasons it should be equipped with M833 to better match it with its opposition.
examples:
(9.3) Leopard 1A5’s use DM33 (408mm pen)
(9.3) Leopard A1A1 (L/44) uses 120mm DM13 (393mm pen)
(9.0) Class 3 P uses DM33
(9.0) TAM 2IP uses DM33
(9.3) M48 Super uses DM33
(9.0-9.3)Type-74E, F, G use Type93 (405 pen)
(9.3) CM11 uses DM63 (430mm pen)
(9.3) STRV 105 uses DM63
(9.3) Olifant mk.2 uses DM63
(9.3) Magach 7C uses DM63
(9.3) Magach Gal Batash uses DM63
(9.3) Merkava 1’s and 2’s use DM33
(9.3) T-64’s and T-72’s use 3BM22 (422mm pen)
(9.3) ZTZ-96 uses Type 1985-I (466mm pen) ← highest penning round of 9.3 btw
(9.3) AMX-32 (120) uses OFL 120 G1 (394mm pen)
(9.0) Chieftain mk.10 uses Shot L23 (410mm pen)
Meanwhile the M60A3 TTS gets M774 that only pens 372mm when it used M833 and M900 historically.
2 Likes
Sea Harrier FRS.1 should go down to 11.0 do ti uses the GR.3’s engine and airframe; and the new AV-8B premium is and the A-10C outclasses it “by a mile” as an attacker or even as a fighter!
2 Likes
Please upvote:
1 Like