The Devs need to remove the crew replenishment for the OBJ. 775 it’s literally a useless modification, because it’s a 2 crew tank.
Yeah I forgot that the below average US mains wouldn’t be happy, but I usually disregard nation main’s opinions when it comes to changing BRs of their vehicles anyway.
Sure, because a plane is the natural counter to SPAA and not the other way around. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
It has scout so I guess 5.3 is too much, 5.7 or maintaining 6.0 would be good.
Is this bias I’m detecting???
The F1C and the JA37D is currently at the same BR but the F1C gets IRCCM missiles which are more reliable than the RB74. Sure the JA37D has a better radar but the F1C is more versatile and better in a prolonged dogfight than the JA37D.
1 Like
Its there for arcade as the tank will still live and gain their crew back.
1 Like
Phoenix is impossible, but Parkour90 missiles can take on fourth-generation fighter jets
So I can go to BR13.3, and I support that
1 Like
Really? Hmm I don’t play arcade, so I wouldn’t know.
And the JA37D has the bigger missile loadout. Trade quantity over everything else, the JA37D isnt a fighter but plays better as a support BnZ jet rather than a dedicated fighter imo. Besides i can out turn a Su 27 and mirage in my first turn, if im going to commit to a turn fight its on me to not mess up my shot.
You are comparing a fairly weak, 1978 early SARH missile vs an okay 1994 ARH missile (which is only weak due to shorter range vs AMRAAM, but equal in most other respects)
and asking if im biaesd towards the Skyflash being bad.
And yet you are totally and completely unbiased by the opinion that R-77 = Skyflash DF
Yeah, i play arcade for those BP challenges to get kills while moving since the M24 is the king imo. Anywho if you get down to one crew member you’ll replenish and gain your extra member back.
You can do the same thing 11.3 aircraft did when having to face the F-14s. Cope and deal with it.
The average F-14 player is already pretty arrogant/overconfident and bad from my experience (as soon as you get close to them they will often even forget simple things, like flaring incoming missiles). So it’s time they start actually playing.
In my opinion the Su-27 and Mig 29 should recive a new correct flight model. Also the Mig 29 should recive R73 because the Su27 is going to be at 13.0 aswell and it carries 4 of them
R 77 is mid but its far from being Skyflash level. Its definitely better than that.
Lol you are so funny)
Air Realistic, Lightning F.53 (premium) this isnt to change its BR, but the Red tops need to be all aspect due to the misslie being such a poor performing misslie, as well as the firestreak having such poor capability in battle.
Where did I ever say they were equal?
There are pros and cons to both vehicles that make them equal.
But you keep bringing up a point that makes no sense, because me and @_Renzo agree among many others that the:
A-10C → 12.0
Su25SM → 12.0 (add the R60s it’s missing)
Which STILL gives an advantage to the A-10C having 4 aim-9m while USSR (its closest counterparts) only have 2 ircm aams, it’s the best deal you’ll get.
1 Like
Ye tho my big nightmare in that br bracjet was the 2s38 which is still in the bracket
He doesnt agree with Su-39 with 2x R-77 = 12.0.
As I have already pointed out, if we were to compare 2x 12.0 aircraft in that instance, such as the Viggen D or Phantom FGR2 vs Su-39. the Su-39 would be the strongest in BVR due to R-77s being a lot stronger than Skyflash DFs, In a WVR fight the Su-39 has the better low speed handling and IRCCM missiles. Rear-aspect IR shots are totally mitigated by IRCM on the Su-39 and only really the Viggen with its Aim-9ls could attempt shots at alternative aspects.
Su-39 holds all the cards at that BR and the only option would be to avoid entering within around 30km of the Su-39.
Su-39 should never get R-77s and if it does, it should be placed at 12.7.
Su-39, Su-25T, Su-25SM3 and A-10C should have the same BR. Though Su-39, Su-25T and Su-25SM3 could perhaps do with getting something like R-27Ts to replace the R-60s (or added in the case of the Su-25SM3 if historically possible)
There are pros and cons to all of them, but Aim-9Ms are not a god-tier missile that automatically means aircraft should be BRed to death. Id argue they are easier to defeat than most IRCCM missiles once you get the technique right.
1 Like