You are comparing a fairly weak, 1978 early SARH missile vs an okay 1994 ARH missile (which is only weak due to shorter range vs AMRAAM, but equal in most other respects)
and asking if im biaesd towards the Skyflash being bad.
And yet you are totally and completely unbiased by the opinion that R-77 = Skyflash DF
Yeah, i play arcade for those BP challenges to get kills while moving since the M24 is the king imo. Anywho if you get down to one crew member you’ll replenish and gain your extra member back.
You can do the same thing 11.3 aircraft did when having to face the F-14s. Cope and deal with it.
The average F-14 player is already pretty arrogant/overconfident and bad from my experience (as soon as you get close to them they will often even forget simple things, like flaring incoming missiles). So it’s time they start actually playing.
In my opinion the Su-27 and Mig 29 should recive a new correct flight model. Also the Mig 29 should recive R73 because the Su27 is going to be at 13.0 aswell and it carries 4 of them
Air Realistic, Lightning F.53 (premium) this isnt to change its BR, but the Red tops need to be all aspect due to the misslie being such a poor performing misslie, as well as the firestreak having such poor capability in battle.
Which STILL gives an advantage to the A-10C having 4 aim-9m while USSR (its closest counterparts) only have 2 ircm aams, it’s the best deal you’ll get.
As I have already pointed out, if we were to compare 2x 12.0 aircraft in that instance, such as the Viggen D or Phantom FGR2 vs Su-39. the Su-39 would be the strongest in BVR due to R-77s being a lot stronger than Skyflash DFs, In a WVR fight the Su-39 has the better low speed handling and IRCCM missiles. Rear-aspect IR shots are totally mitigated by IRCM on the Su-39 and only really the Viggen with its Aim-9ls could attempt shots at alternative aspects.
Su-39 holds all the cards at that BR and the only option would be to avoid entering within around 30km of the Su-39.
Su-39 should never get R-77s and if it does, it should be placed at 12.7.
Su-39, Su-25T, Su-25SM3 and A-10C should have the same BR. Though Su-39, Su-25T and Su-25SM3 could perhaps do with getting something like R-27Ts to replace the R-60s (or added in the case of the Su-25SM3 if historically possible)
There are pros and cons to all of them, but Aim-9Ms are not a god-tier missile that automatically means aircraft should be BRed to death. Id argue they are easier to defeat than most IRCCM missiles once you get the technique right.
Nobody says this. A pop or two every 10 seconds is the realistic assumption.
none of these matters. it’s the rate where missile track for afterbuner and flare. both have the same number. I can’t remember where I’ve seen it but PL-5B and Magic shares equal flare track rate with magic. IE they seek flare at higher rate than Afterbuner by 2x.
because There’s more game of me being uptiered to 11.7 than there is me staying in 10.7-11.3 range with any of my 11.0 jets. simple as. 10.0 - 10.3 is the BR that sticks together, while everything above is the uptier prone BR.
You’re the one saying that. I said it exist.
Nobody asked your opinion on how this plane BR should be handled either. it’s such a non-issue to begin with but you just have the need to be the all-knowing.
okay Pro. show your earning from this game if it’s so important to be good. you must be swimming in WT earned cash if you’re emphasizing on skill this much.
This vehicle was the later evolution of the CCVL and it is from the 90’s. Currently it has older ammo (M774) than what the CCVL uses (M833). It doesn’t make sense that the newer vehicle uses the older ammo type. M900 was also produced in the early 90’s so the XM8 would be using that ammo type.
We know how long these “we’re looking at takes”.
Regardless, no Type 16 ever fired M735 as Type 93 was specifically made for the JSW 105 cannon, which was to be mounted on the Type 16s.