Why? It’s the same Fox-3 missile
Honestly sweden would be better off with the F 35, as it can carry 2 missiles has counter measures and a ton of bombs and a lot of hardpoints. It could be quite a good vehicle for CAS and Honestly better than the AJ in terms of effectiveness. Sweden also lacks a good TT draken. Having a combined Nor/DK 5th air line similar to Benelux would help fill in actual air gaps and bring more diversity to the current selection of aircraft.
(Not the US F 35 for people not aware of the Danish Drakens designation)
Considering each match has 3~5 A10Cs, they can sit mid map and do map control, not hard. And they can tell who’s friendly or not, with great visibility in the cockpit.
Bro, you’re dumb, aren’t you?..
This anti-aircraft gun has a rating of 5.3 because it is difficult to kill from an airplane.
I know very well how to kill a Sherman, but we are talking about an anti-aircraft gun and how to kill it from an airplane
I see that you only play Britain, so you have never played against this anti-aircraft gun and really want your favorite nation’s equipment to become more powerful
The F-14B at 13.0 is bringing Aim-54s against R-77s, Aim-120s, and every other more modern ARH missile. In what universe are they the same fox-3?
Unfortunately the problem with the JA37D getting ARH is that it wpuld be the worst as having AIM 9L as backups at that BR are effectively worthless.
Its more likely gaijin will avoid adding a TT viggen with ARH and just add one as a prem as i find it the most likely option gaijin will try to capitalize on with nations with 3rd gen ARH slingers.
Aim-9Gs really dont like locking on in side aspect like that I find, at least vs Su-39s and then all you have to do is drop 1 flare and its defeated.
Canon, yes, if i have it equipped, often in Sim I run fuel tank instead.
based upon wiki, exact same speed, but Skyflash have a max range of maybe 15km , but rarely do I fire them past about 10km and can usually be defeated kinematically by most aircraft. (providing the PDV radar wants to actually guide them) R-77 have signicantly higher range than that and require a huge amount of effort to evade. R-77s are one of the better “dogfighting” ARH in game.
That’s what I’ve been saying
But it’s the same category
Same
Most of my Skyflash struggle past 7km unless im in high alt, at which pount R77 still is a bit better unless i try dodging which bleeds its speed a ton.
Don’t worry, this won’t happen, your Sherman will continue to be bombed
And the Aim-9B is in the same category as the Aim-9M. What’s your point?
That is also the reason that I puch for it to go down to 11.7 since it has a poor RWR by 11.3 standards.
That’s how IR missile works but, nobody needs to spam flares unnecessarily.
Prove it?
The spreadsheet says Magic 1/PL-7 is better in Fin AoA, Guidance start delay (just 0.5sec), Gimbal limit, impulse of boosters,track rate (which is basically useless), and a few other useless or unimportant factors.
BTW, FoV is about 0.1 degree smaller for PL-5B which doesn’t give huge difference.
This was not the case when I last played the Harrier GR.1 and MiG-21MF.
How did you know that “10.7 is such an uptier-prone BR that the 9.7” even if you don’t have ANY 10.7 jets?
Your delusion is simply ridiculous.
Skills issue confirmed.
You have literally proven to yourself that hugging on deck meta doesn’t exist below 11.0s.
Cope L
Nobody forced to you buy J-7D.
You just play an aircraft with relatively high skill requirements for the grind and then cry because you couldn’t handle it.
Yeah, closer the better, considering R-24Rs are the main thing I fight in the Phantoms, waiting till 8km puts them at a huge advantage, so I risk firing at more like 10km as in a joust, I should just about win vs something like a Mig-23ML.
But… usually I just bait the soviet players up high and the soviet noobs fall for it everytime
Eh, id say it should match the Mirage F1C as imo they were the two best planes at their old BR, i didnt look to see their new BR. If they are the same BR than its fine, though my problem is the F16’s going down to 12.7 and the F16A being 12.3 lmao
And it would take a lot of time to get up to speed for the R-77 considering the Su-39 taps out at 600 mph, while in an F4S for example you can get up to 1000 mph with 8 aams.
- Chieftain Mk 10: If you’re going to move it up, remove L23 ammo and replace it with L23A1. L23 never existed, it’s ahistorical.
Preferably also remove the L15A3 as the Mk 10 would have never fired it. Considering the British moved to L23A1. However, if that can’t be done please add L15A5 as an unlockable round.
On the grounds i’ve slapped the living hell out of F-15s in the Sea Harrier FA2 and aircraft that should be more than half the speed, with the exact same AAM. Despite the “launch aircraft is soo much slower” arguemnt. I dont entirely agree with that argument.
Besides, R-77 is not equal in specs to the Skyflash DF. On paper, maybe, in reality, I would comfortably give every, single, advantage to the R-77