Oh god.
Can’t wait to see Tu-4 ruin everythings just like 2016
Nostalgia thunder mode(the only thing nostalgic was the economy)
1 Like
Have you played TOR? Are you kiding me?
So, 11.0s have to fight R-77s but god forbid 11.3s having to deal with Aim-54s.
Yeah, no, 12.7 is the lowest Id want to even consider Su-39 with 2x R-77s
1 Like
I was part of victims of Tu-4 at that time. :/
Air RB, A10A (Early). 10.3 > 10.7. With many flareless airplanes being moved up in BR they will end up faceing this plane without any ability to defend themself. Aim-9L should not be able to see flareless aircraft. Alternatively keep it at 10.3 but replace Aim-9L with Aim-9J.
1 Like
Well, even if Tu-4s are back at 7.3 they will still probably have little attention, probably besides defyn trying to troll with the thing. Bombers lack their ability to turn the tide of a game, and offers little reward compared to other vehicles gameplay at the same BR.
1 Like
They wouldn’t be playable with the constant up-tiering against ARH missile buses.
KF41 should not be increased to 11.0, and compared with the same type of vehicle, the kf41 has no unmanned turret, poor protection ability, and mobility performance is also not outstanding.
2 Likes
Air RB, SU-25. 10.3 > 10.7. With many flareless airplanes being moved up in BR they will end up faceing this plane without any ability to defend themself. R60M should not be able to see flareless aircraft. Alternatively keep it at 10.3 but replace R60M with R60.
3 Likes
Air RB, SU-25K. 10.3 > 10.7. With many flareless airplanes being moved up in BR they will end up faceing this plane without any ability to defend themself. R60M should not be able to see flareless aircraft. Alternatively keep it at 10.3 but replace R60MK with R60.
At least they won’t be Leopard 2A4s, 292s and Mordernas.
Again, R-77s are terrible (in my experience, clearly you missed where I said I wasn’t having good performance with them).
Is they got R-27ER → 12.7
If it got R-77 → 12.3/ 12.0
If it got R-27R → 12.0
But, why are we talking about this ? We need to balance the thing that unbalanced everything: The A10C and you don’t even own it or play usa really so I don’t get why your trying to defend it so badly.
2 Likes
If you didn’t learn how to kill a Sherman at 3.0 that’s your issue.
I think incrementally increasing Wyvern until it hits the right spot is good. 4.7 is a good start, since going to 4.3 changed nothing.
Also, it is definitely possible to take away its air start (see Attacker FB.1) but I don’t think it should lose that. It should just go up to a BR at which it will not be an OP A2A fighter.
It’s worth noting that at 4.7 or 5.0, the Wyvern won’t be able to clear a full base outside of a full downtier. This will encourage more cooperation and less toxic behavior among Wyvern spammers. Actually, it may cut down on Wyvern spammers, since killing a full base per match is not a guarantee.
They might be terrible at 13.7 vs things like F-15Cs with 8x AMRAAM. Anything sub 12.7 they would be singel strongest AAM, without a doubt, nothing would even come close. Though if 2x R-77s at 12.0 is fair, then 2x ASRAAM on the Tornado Gr4 at 12.0 is also fair
I see your point, but the F&F capability is still a huge plus point even if the missile performs badly.
That’s the gripe of 11.3-12.0 player have with AIM-54, they are forced to play defensive while the tomcats are free to do whatever they wanted with you.
Nahhh. T90M fits good with 2A7
I agree. 10.7 would be fine. 11.0 is over kill.
Worse gun, WAY less mobile, less missles, caged seeker, thermals. 9.7 would be alright.
1 Like