That is true, but that is less likely for the devs or the players to do.
It’s more favorable to increase it’s br, and see how it performs then go from there.
That is true, but that is less likely for the devs or the players to do.
It’s more favorable to increase it’s br, and see how it performs then go from there.
Thing is the 9.7s and 10.0s being mpved up wont change a ton cause its still gonna be constant full upteirs the 10.3s being moved are the only ones i wont see anymore
2x 77 vs what 4 Aim-54? And better radar systems, more open cockpits, etc. everything in every aspect has to be considered.
So 2x R-77s and 2x R-73s vs 2x Aim-9L for Sea Harrier FRS1e vs Su-39 is a fair fight to you?
Or 2x R-77s vs J35XS with no RWR at all is a fair fight to you?
Do you really think 10.7 aircraft can actually deal with R-77s?
12.7 is the lowest they should be placed at.
Air RB, F8U2. 10.0 > 10.7. It’s a F8E that lacks Aim-9C, otherwise it’s the same aircraft. It has very good flight performance and it has countermeasures. There is no reason for it to be lower than the F8E. At minimum it should go to 10.3.
F-4J(UK) → 11.7
FG.1 → stay 12.0
FGR.2 → add AIM-9L x4 → 12.3
Agreed. Too many nerfs to bombers in general and to base regeneration since it moved to 7.3.
6.7 is perfect. Move Tu-4 to 7.3.
Vehicle: ZTL11
BR: RB 9.7 → 9.3
Reason: This so-called LT is acutally a TD. It has nothing but high-pen dart rounds.
Considering this thing has
·no mobility,
·no gun depression,
·no backing speed,
·no commander control,
·no 50 cal resistance,
·no reload speed,
·enormous turn radius,
·mountain high chunk,
·has a 3-man-one-shot-straight-dead-turret.
It should really go to 9.3.
Or at least get the backing gear right.
I never said anything about it being 11.7 with r-77s, if it was added, it would be 12.0
Air Rb, J35XS 11.0 > 10.3 the lack of flares guns and performance in general, this jet can’t be cosidered to be at the same level of the other 11.0 or in a uptier 12.0
Oh god.
Can’t wait to see Tu-4 ruin everythings just like 2016
Nostalgia thunder mode(the only thing nostalgic was the economy)
Have you played TOR? Are you kiding me?
So, 11.0s have to fight R-77s but god forbid 11.3s having to deal with Aim-54s.
Yeah, no, 12.7 is the lowest Id want to even consider Su-39 with 2x R-77s
I was part of victims of Tu-4 at that time. :/
Air RB, A10A (Early). 10.3 > 10.7. With many flareless airplanes being moved up in BR they will end up faceing this plane without any ability to defend themself. Aim-9L should not be able to see flareless aircraft. Alternatively keep it at 10.3 but replace Aim-9L with Aim-9J.
Well, even if Tu-4s are back at 7.3 they will still probably have little attention, probably besides defyn trying to troll with the thing. Bombers lack their ability to turn the tide of a game, and offers little reward compared to other vehicles gameplay at the same BR.
They wouldn’t be playable with the constant up-tiering against ARH missile buses.
KF41 should not be increased to 11.0, and compared with the same type of vehicle, the kf41 has no unmanned turret, poor protection ability, and mobility performance is also not outstanding.
Air RB, SU-25. 10.3 > 10.7. With many flareless airplanes being moved up in BR they will end up faceing this plane without any ability to defend themself. R60M should not be able to see flareless aircraft. Alternatively keep it at 10.3 but replace R60M with R60.