JH7A 12.3->12.0 (Air Combat History)
This aircraft only has four non-jamming omnidirectional infrared missiles but at the high level of 12.3, except for a good radar that is of little use to it, if you want to maintain the current level, please add PL11 or PL12, the radar of the JH7A is fully capable of firing one of the missiles, but PLAAF has never done this, because PLAAF has only done some technical verification on the JH7A.
25 Likes
Based upon the thread for them. The Su-39 at least could get R-27R, R-27T, R-27ER, R-27ET and R-77s. (on the pylons that currently mount the R-60)
R-77s would put them at 12.7/13.0 instantly. R-27ER and R-27ET would probably put them at 12+
R-27Ts… They would be fine.
(at least if I remember that information correctly, been a while since I looked at that thread)
Except, they aren’t. Yes they have a smokeless motor, but if an A-10 has gotten a shot off at you without you noticing its there, you would have also died to an Aim-9L.
Flaring them isnt any harder than R-73 or Magic II, just different.
In all other respects, they have the same performance as an Aim-9L (even down to the incorrect lock ranges)
Not even 11.3, if it is a pure gun plane, its airframe is more comprable to the subsonic fighters, and it would be fairly well balanced against the later subsonics. At this BR the amount of CM’s and any IRCM or HMD doesnt matter.
Tanks - most ATGM only vehicles ie RAKJpz2, RAKJpz2HOT, M901, (IT-1 ? maybe not this one), swingfire, striker, ZT3A2, type 60 ATM, M113A1 and varients(also why is this not in USA TT), pvrbv 551, udes 33, Zaclam tiger
mode - GRB
BR- down 1 step ie 0.3/0.4 for all
Reason- Since the missile/ATGM nerfs, controlling and using these missile only vehicles has become alot harder, any slight movement in the direction of the missile by correcting throws the missile completly off making it alot harder in most cases to a hit a target, also these vehicles barley get used anymore and in general do very poorly, the Tow-2b/Bill varients are alot more usable but suggest adding the Tow2b/Bill as already unlocked for them.
1 Like
The R77 mounts between the R73 and Vikhir. (I’m play of the agm)
The R-27ER would make it a 12.7, those R-77s… are meh to say the least, I still prefer the R-27ER, I don’t think I’ve scored a single kill with an R-77, not to say I’ve fired more than 12, but still.
1 Like
so do all deltas at low speed, punch the reheat and keep it at high speeds (~600 kph IAS minimum) and you UFO
F8U-2 at 10.0 is CRIMINAL.
Please Ctrl+F and upvote the other comments about it so that Gaijin take notice!
5 Likes
JH7A should be strengthened
gaijn should restore the four KH29T air-to-surface missiles that the JH7A should have, and if it does, the ground weight of the JH7A can rise to 12.0
31 Likes
If F-14A is going to be at 12.7 with rear-aspect only IRs and the Aim-54, an easy to defeat ARH and the Sea Harrier FA2 a 9.7 airframe, with a better engine and AMRAAM is at 13.0. Then Su-39 with 2x R-77s is at a minimum 12.7
The Merkava MK3 should stay at their current BR because they are heavy, slow and have a massive Profile without offering Armour
Merkava MK3 11.3>11.0
2 Likes
That is true, but that is less likely for the devs or the players to do.
It’s more favorable to increase it’s br, and see how it performs then go from there.
Thing is the 9.7s and 10.0s being mpved up wont change a ton cause its still gonna be constant full upteirs the 10.3s being moved are the only ones i wont see anymore
2x 77 vs what 4 Aim-54? And better radar systems, more open cockpits, etc. everything in every aspect has to be considered.
1 Like
So 2x R-77s and 2x R-73s vs 2x Aim-9L for Sea Harrier FRS1e vs Su-39 is a fair fight to you?
Or 2x R-77s vs J35XS with no RWR at all is a fair fight to you?
Do you really think 10.7 aircraft can actually deal with R-77s?
12.7 is the lowest they should be placed at.
1 Like
Air RB, F8U2. 10.0 > 10.7. It’s a F8E that lacks Aim-9C, otherwise it’s the same aircraft. It has very good flight performance and it has countermeasures. There is no reason for it to be lower than the F8E. At minimum it should go to 10.3.
F-4J(UK) → 11.7
FG.1 → stay 12.0
FGR.2 → add AIM-9L x4 → 12.3
1 Like
Agreed. Too many nerfs to bombers in general and to base regeneration since it moved to 7.3.
6.7 is perfect. Move Tu-4 to 7.3.
1 Like
Vehicle: ZTL11
BR: RB 9.7 → 9.3
Reason: This so-called LT is acutally a TD. It has nothing but high-pen dart rounds.
Considering this thing has
·no mobility,
·no gun depression,
·no backing speed,
·no commander control,
·no 50 cal resistance,
·no reload speed,
·enormous turn radius,
·mountain high chunk,
·has a 3-man-one-shot-straight-dead-turret.
It should really go to 9.3.
Or at least get the backing gear right.
10 Likes
I never said anything about it being 11.7 with r-77s, if it was added, it would be 12.0
1 Like
Air Rb, J35XS 11.0 > 10.3 the lack of flares guns and performance in general, this jet can’t be cosidered to be at the same level of the other 11.0 or in a uptier 12.0
3 Likes