A-10’s:
So, again in my experience firing aim-54s I think I only had 1 miss against a Mig29, all the other hit with just 1.
Meanwhile, my R-77 acts like an R-4 or something primitive lol
At least the Su-39 could book it away if it fired an R-77, it would have a chance to escape a fighter, it could also help the “zombie bomber” USA problem of people who just get in F-111s and kill all your AFs before you can sneeze.
1 Like
Air RB Sea Vixen F.A.W. Mk.2 8.7 > 8.7
If this plane is gonna be 9.0 on the up tier you have little chance against opponents because you are slower than them, less maneuverable and of course you don’t have a cannon. One of the unique features of the Sea Vixen is that at the cost of the cannon it has 4 medium rockets. This plane on 9.0 will lose this feature and will be a useless vehicle that can’t cope on the up tier.
4 Likes
Do a pro / con unbiased comparison of the two. I cannot see them in game rn, I’m not home.
Surs if the person that faces the T-90M is an idiot. Sadly it won’t only face bots.
I had 3-5 of them shot at me in my Kurnass today and none of them hit.
Su-39 with R-77, should be 12.7, no where lower.
Ground RB, 2S38. 10.0 > 11.0. This tank is very versatile and it’s closest equivalent is the HSTV-L and that one is going to 11.7. The 2S38 could also go up to 11.7, this is due to it having a rapid reload, good penetration, and 148 rounds that can be fired before needing to restock. It has HE-VT and IR-tracking, and can engage planes and helicopters, in addition to being able to effectively destroy tanks.
4 Likes
Man that F-14 pilot needs to retire then lmao.
What,. R-77 vs Skyflash DFs, Aim-7E, (whatever the french SARH is I cant recall of the top of my head) and R-24R?
Let alone R-77 vs Aim-9L, R-60, Python 3, heck even Magic II, R-73 or Aim-9M
Do i really need to explain why R-77 would absolutely dominate?
1 Like
Look higher up in the responces. Already made one about the A10A (Early).
The only problem with that is you kill the good AA the USSR has there, how do you fix that? I’m not against it going up, but again, how do you compensate for that loss?
Was in multiple games so were all different maps/pilots. No clue if they were Fakours or 54As, all I cared about was the “Missile” on my RWR and that I wanted it to leave me alone.
1 Like
Oh yeah almost forgot about those💀
Not every nation has a good AA at every BR. The other nations also don’t have a good AA like the 2S6 around 10.7-11.0, yet that also isn’t “fixed”.
You grind out the 2S6 and the Strela-10M2. Russia already have the most consistent AA coverage in the game.
Yes, yes you do. Because it pretty much means the fighters which fought uncontested to the Su-39 actually have to fight tactically.
R-77 goes Mach 4.0 on the airframe it has, according to @Axzuel
So with its slower speed compared to fighters, the R-77 would be far less effective than say a mig-29
I remember someone saying in my thread about realistic armament pretty much being spot on for the A-10C, meanwhile the Su-39 is lacking more than half of its irl armaments (not that I really care, just a comparison).
(No other Su changes)
So again A-10C → 12.0
Su-25SM3 → 12.0
And there everyone is happy again.
it has CW signal bruh 😭
You are very funny
Your problem is that you play badly and want to lower the rating of a normal machine
I’m trying to explain that it’s almost impossible to kill a Sherman with an airplane.
ARB, Su-7BKL 9.3 > 9.7
The Su-7BKL should definetly not be 9.7 in Air Realistic Battles. It doesn’t have any missles or countermeasures. The only thing that it has is speed and 160 rounds of 30mm. At 9.7 it would be really useless. And the only relevant things seperating it from the Su-7B are some extra rockets and a bomb computer, which do not contribute to the performance in Air RB. It should stay at 9.3.
We can say the same about every tank
Because the J35XS only used AIM 9P3/RB24J and R13M1. They cant get better missiles since they didn’t use anything better. You should actually do some research before asking for an unrealistic change.
1 Like