The flight model (nose authority at low speed is inexistant for a DELTA wing + canards,…)and weaponnary aren’t on par with Su-27/J-11 which are going down to 13.0
Mirage 4000 may have a lot of Magic-2, but need to use the fuel tanks to support them which adds drag and weight.
The Super 530D is clearly not on par with R-27ER abilities, neither is the RDM-3 radar in comparison to J-11/Su-27 radar.
Doesn’t recieved any form of HMD as for the Mirage 2000C-S5 which is at BR 12.3 Air RB, and not alike J-11/Su-27, which reduce the ability of Magic-2 at close range.
With these new BR changes I believe that a new shell for the Leclerc is long overdue.
It hasn’t received any new shell since its introduction in May 2019 (over 5 years ago !!), back then it was part of its uniqueness, a great shell on a good tank.
Nowadays the Leclerc gets completely overshadowed by its contemporaries, due to lackluster armor, over average but not exceptional mobility and large weakspots.
Tanks such as the 2PL and the M1A1 HC offer very similar gameplay but have edges over the Leclerc (most notably much more reliable armor and survivability) for only small drawbacks, and these tanks are now receiving significantly better firepower whilst being at a lower BR.
I believe that giving great firepower to the Leclerc would restore its uniqueness and give it a bit more reason to play it over its counterparts.
all 6.3-7.0 ships should have BR adjusted with an addition of 7.3
Reasoning: current 7.0 contains ships of significantly different capabilities, stuff like Hyuga, Arizona, Kongo are much weaker to newer ships like Amagi, Mutsu, Scharnhorst or Hood.
Even though I don’t perform as well in it as I would like, I think a lot of this is due to the lack of other competitive US planes at 5.0 and the general inexperience of teams (since many new players choose US as their first tree).
Game mode: ARB
Proposal: R-73s for the MiG-29 9.13s, accompanied with the removal of the R-27ER if necessary.
Reasoning: Same as above, in addition to the fact that the R-27ER is less effective when launched from early MiG-29s due to the comparative decrease in radar effectiveness, as well as the fact that this was the historical loadout for MiG-29s in Soviet service. This would overall allow the MiG-29s to trade weapon range for sustained fighting ability.
This plane has always been blatantly better than anything at its br in terms of flight performance to the point where the only real option is to try to run away from it which also is an issue due to the long range and short burn time of PL-5 missiles giving only a short window to notice them, it is virtually untouchable in most situations if the pilot has the slightest idea of what they are doing, its a massive issue to the point of entire teams of J-7Es were relatively common recently due to the ease of playstyle it has, if only having rear aspects is an issue it is very capable of mounting the all aspect PL-5C.
Realistic, BT-7A (F-32) 3.7 = 4.0. Good change, but would recommend moving it to Rank 3. Otherwise people will be reluctant to play it as there are better tanks
Naval AB RB, USS Gearing. 4.7->5.0. Turret x3 5 inch x2 destroyers (Gearing, Frank Knox) and USS Sumner are asymmetrically equal to Turret x4 5 inch x2 destroyers (Porter, Somers, Moffet) by having (bigger) 19mm additional external armor vs 12.7 (as for x4 turreted), what makes them more durable and harder to destroy, plus rear magazine does not blow the whole ship since it has only 1 rear main caliber turret (less total ammo), 4km/h lower speed does not make x3 turreted destroyers any noticeably worse.
