I do like the R-7s if I have to fly defensively though.
Wann sollen die Änderungen kommen?
Half the fucking tree is under-BR’d stupid. How do you think F8U-2 is fair at 10.0? the entire prop department from 2.7?
You are an insufferable prick that cries when your underBR’d toy get placed in the place it deserve. And you shut the fuck up before you yap about me not playing US. I played that tree, everything but bomber line is researched up to the early jets with F-8U2 as exception and I still think that the plane are at unfairly advantageous BR.
1 Like
Assuming you mean the A-7’s here, i have only included the A-7K as it is the only one with all aspects, the others are probably not optimal at 10.7 but they are not actively causing problems with their missiles.
The chinese ztz99a, wz1001e/lct, and vt-4a1 should have a reduced reload time of 6~6.7s and add liners.
First of all, as is known to all, the ztz99a series are very weak from course angle, not to mention the lfp and the nearly non-existing mantlet. Meanwhile, 99a has good mobility, meaning it should at least be a flanker with good firepower. However, what we see now is 7.1s reload, one of the slowest reload time at top tier, and 577mm penetration, the worst after the british 564 and france 575 (who both have 5s reload). Lets look about another vehicle with similar firepower: t-90m. t-90m has far better protection, and obviously no one will consider t-90m better than t-80bvm with 6.5s reload and amazing mobility. The 7.1s reload is severely disconnected to the current pace of top tier games, and seriously lowers 99as ceiling. When it comes to vt-4a1, can you imagine ztz99a with worse reserve speed, glued tracks, worse gun depression still at the same br only for its 4-round aps?
9 Likes
You are right.
And they would be absolutely pointless to play at that point. Gaijin themselves pointed out that, at least in Air RB, the A-10As and the Su-25s were already sitting with a low efficiency rating. Moving them up, without the forward spawn Gaijin said they would get to balance out the BR increase, has most likely not improved their efficiency. They’d get bullied by ever SARH missile out there. In what world is that fair?
The F-14s, especially the A and IRIAF, have been oppressing an entire BR range (11.3-12.3). Just because you have to use your brain in them now doesn’t mean they are ruined.
4 Likes
US Air main head need to be cracked open and studied. there’s a lot of case of severe retardation in this post alone.
1 Like
What nation other than USA hard ARH missiles at the Br of the F14?
Because… I cannot say I remember any of them.
Id you’d like to get into a plane with R-73s and I get into a plane with Aim-9m, I’d win every time.
Honestly with how OP the sims ground target extermination is going, the AV-8B should probably see 11.7 itself. Looking at the kill feed, suddenly one of those has like 10 ground target kills, and re-arms to do it all again.
So… A-10C with 2x IRCCM missiles and 2x IR missiles is 12.0 but Su-39/Su-25 is 11.7 with the same loadout. Definetly no soviet bias there
1 Like
And yet the same can be said to you. Why am I able to play against it fairly well and you can’t? Not trying to bait anyone but the “skill issue” argument goes both ways.
RB, VFM5 should stay on 9.3. We already have XM8 on 9.7 wich was made on the same base and have a termal vision and automatic reload in 5.0 seconds. Also in Britain tree we have no any other technics with the same BR except new BR of Rooikat 105.
1 Like
I’m talking about Air SB, not the same as RB. Aim-9m effectiveness in Air SB is more than triple that of RB
Neither of those “Soviet” planes have a MAW, pingless IFF, or 1000 rnds of ammo, or the turn rate that the A-10C has.
Keep in mind. The Su-25SM3 ONLY has 2x R-73 at 12.3, so there is bias your right, against the USSR.
Try again Morvran_ you’re as biased as they come dude. Any post you make is pretty much how insufferable it is to fight USSR and how the Brit’s suffer.
Everybody has their good and bad vehicles, but I don’t think the Uk suffers in the least bit.
ARB, Sea Harrier FRS.1. 11.3 > 11.0. This plane have no differences between Sea Harrier FRS.1 (e) exept that it have on 2 more AIM-9L. BR difference in 0.7 is too big for that.
2 Likes
vt4a 12.0-11.7 this tank in 12.0 is too weak. vt4a cant shot good and cant defense this br apfsds . i cant understand why it with l2a7 t80bvm strv122.
2 Likes
I meant R-73s my bad. They’re good as a defensive measure, but usually the enemy fighter flares them. Sometimes they’ll hit
Both have IRCM, a feature the A-10C doesnt have
Both have 16x unflareable short range AGMs with Prox fuse. Something the A-10C doesnt
Both have incredibly tanky airframes able to shrug off most damage from first and sometimes second hits from AAMs, something the A-10C cant.
Both have better flight performance than the A-10
Both have perfectly usable guns
Both have Radar with IFF
The only advantage the A-10C has is the HMD IFF and the MAWS. Thats it. I know you are a “Soviet needs to be outright OP and if anyone else has anything better nerf them and buff us.” Like you have a post for 4x R-73s on the Su-24 but it to remain at 11.3 or the fact you want the Fox to be at a higher BR than any other IFV in game.
But No. Su-25/Su-39 and A-10C should be the same BR. Period. If one is at 12.3 then so should hte other
Maybe because you are a US main, a below average one at that too, with the F-14s on your side most of the time.
Of course a US main will fight to keep their nation’s vehicles at a favorable or unbalanced BR. A lot of nation mains do that.
1 Like