So… A-10C with 2x IRCCM missiles and 2x IR missiles is 12.0 but Su-39/Su-25 is 11.7 with the same loadout. Definetly no soviet bias there
1 Like
And yet the same can be said to you. Why am I able to play against it fairly well and you can’t? Not trying to bait anyone but the “skill issue” argument goes both ways.
RB, VFM5 should stay on 9.3. We already have XM8 on 9.7 wich was made on the same base and have a termal vision and automatic reload in 5.0 seconds. Also in Britain tree we have no any other technics with the same BR except new BR of Rooikat 105.
1 Like
I’m talking about Air SB, not the same as RB. Aim-9m effectiveness in Air SB is more than triple that of RB
Neither of those “Soviet” planes have a MAW, pingless IFF, or 1000 rnds of ammo, or the turn rate that the A-10C has.
Keep in mind. The Su-25SM3 ONLY has 2x R-73 at 12.3, so there is bias your right, against the USSR.
Try again Morvran_ you’re as biased as they come dude. Any post you make is pretty much how insufferable it is to fight USSR and how the Brit’s suffer.
Everybody has their good and bad vehicles, but I don’t think the Uk suffers in the least bit.
ARB, Sea Harrier FRS.1. 11.3 > 11.0. This plane have no differences between Sea Harrier FRS.1 (e) exept that it have on 2 more AIM-9L. BR difference in 0.7 is too big for that.
2 Likes
vt4a 12.0-11.7 this tank in 12.0 is too weak. vt4a cant shot good and cant defense this br apfsds . i cant understand why it with l2a7 t80bvm strv122.
2 Likes
I meant R-73s my bad. They’re good as a defensive measure, but usually the enemy fighter flares them. Sometimes they’ll hit
Both have IRCM, a feature the A-10C doesnt have
Both have 16x unflareable short range AGMs with Prox fuse. Something the A-10C doesnt
Both have incredibly tanky airframes able to shrug off most damage from first and sometimes second hits from AAMs, something the A-10C cant.
Both have better flight performance than the A-10
Both have perfectly usable guns
Both have Radar with IFF
The only advantage the A-10C has is the HMD IFF and the MAWS. Thats it. I know you are a “Soviet needs to be outright OP and if anyone else has anything better nerf them and buff us.” Like you have a post for 4x R-73s on the Su-24 but it to remain at 11.3 or the fact you want the Fox to be at a higher BR than any other IFV in game.
But No. Su-25/Su-39 and A-10C should be the same BR. Period. If one is at 12.3 then so should hte other
Maybe because you are a US main, a below average one at that too, with the F-14s on your side most of the time.
Of course a US main will fight to keep their nation’s vehicles at a favorable or unbalanced BR. A lot of nation mains do that.
1 Like
Please upvote the earlier suggestion for that:
1 Like
I’m not! I went to a 7.0 BR battle and saw a T-55. But it could have been a T-54 I can’t remember. Either way I don’t want to see Cold War tanks fighting World War II tanks.
Honestly, even 11.0 wouldn’t be a stretch (See Mig-23MF). You get basically no RWR, a giga-nerfed FM and only 4 all aspect IR missiles. Not to mention that the F-104S should go down to 10.7, especially after the massive FM nerf (Granted its missiles are rear aspect only).
Because it’s used on more aircraft? I have to say. If the 9M is this upsetting, I can’t imagine what the reaction will be when first gen 9Xs start coming to the game. And I vividly remember many of players in this forum saying the 9M was going to be garbage compared to everything else. I’m sorry, as I’m not trying to be an arse, but to me (as someone who enjoys and plays sim the most) it’s just not the threat you are making it on any airframes it’s on.
The phoenix missiles are okay at best now. Definitely not good enough that the F-14A needs to go up, and unless the B model is getting 9Ms, it doesn’t need to go higher than the Su-27 in any capacity. And in no way am I ever going to support removing the only defensive means the A-10s have just to keep them viable in Air RB. “You don’t get a major part of your kit” is truly an asinine take. Apologies but it is.
These proposals are less about balancing and come across more as (again) “let’s just make two thirds of the US’s top tier weak”.
Forget Aim-9X. I cant wait for the cope threats about ASRAAM or IRIS-T :D
1 Like
vt4a 12.0-11.7 this tank in 12.0 is too weak. vt4a cant shot good and cant defense this br apfsds . i cant understand why it can battle with l2a7 t80bvm strv122 ???
2 Likes
I’m sure they’re going to stomp. Just like the 27ER did for the longest time.
This is the thing tho, do you not think all of the Su-25’s would be so much more fun to play, less frustrating to play against, and easier to spade if they were at the mid-BR’s for jets, like 8.7-9.3, where your airframe is actually comprable to the other jets around you, and you are a gun plane, just for the air modes? I would massively prefer this campared to how things are currently
ZTZ99A/WZ1001(E)/VT4A1 11.7->11.0
Reason: Poor protection, slowest reload time, only 577mm shell penetration. especially wz1001, gaijin did adjust the model of ztz-99a, but wz1001 with exactly same structure as ZTZ-99a still stay the same. Also recently, the main armor of the ZTZ99A was weakened by 200KE, makes the remodeling even meaningless and GAIJIN did not come up with any reason. Reload time is also not real at all, the CCTV China has already post the video of ZTZ99a reload which is about 5seconds. But what gaijin did seems that they just think Chinese tanks are only terrible imitation of RUS tanks. But China has improved lots of technologies on their own, and every parts on ZTZ-99A is completely invented by China itself, which has nothing related to Russia at all. They’d either make everything as same as what has published in real world or be responsible for what they’ve done. This is not an emotionally charged report, but a fact. Think about it! If you’ve ever played with the tanks of the Chinese faction, you’ll think I’m right.
9 Likes
The issue with the 9M is that you see it on much lower BR than what you would see the AIM-9X at making its smokeless motor even more deadlier. At a BR that the 9X would be at, most fights would be at BVR while you can see the 9M on non BVR capable aircraft