AGREED. ZTZ99A and VT4 shouldn’t go to 12.0, especially VT4 because it doesn’t worth battle rating 12.0 no matter mobility, survivability nor fire power.
8 Likes
620 is a general seperator between the ability to lolpen T-80U UFP, but there are now more armored tanks than the T-80U, and there arent really an indicator for western designs since people just aim for weakspots. Russian designs can be said the same now as well since a 3bm42 can probably LFP BVM.
2 Likes
XM1(GM) 9.3>9.0 105 shell with almost no pen for its br plus reletively weak armor and a 8.7 second reload. The m60a1 rise is a full br lower with the same shell same reload just with slightly worse armor and no thermals plus it has era. The current br xm1 is only able to pen on teir tanks if you hit a weakspot and those tanks have shells that can go through the thickest part of your armor with the same reload
2 Likes
Extra pen just helps with angles, instead of penning weakspots.
His tactical mobility could not hide his poor firepower and protection.Have you actually tried it？
This isn’t about whether “you can do well or not” on a tank; it’s about HOW EASILY you can do well or not on a tank.
If you need to play competitively with a tank for it to work, while you can shut your brain off and still do well on another tank, there’s a balance issue there.
3 Likes
XM1 (GM) gets thermals, pretty good mobility, and decent armour, along with the same round as the M6A1 RISE (P). The XM-803, which is 9.0, gets a much worse reload (7.5s instead of 6.7s), no thermals, slightly better mobility, slightly worse round, and worse optics.
I honestly think the XM-1 (GM) and the XM-1 (Chrysler) should be the same BR of 9.3.
1 Like
XM-1 (GM) is fine as is, the main problem it had was the br itself - 9.3 - which absolutely sucked as a whole. With the 9.3 decompression, it’ll perform much better.
1 Like
only six
my dude I have the entire top tier chinese tree ground out
AMX A-1A could go down to 10.7. At 11.0 its pretty bad especialy the AA missles not being great. Yes, they have 45G pull, but they have 0 flare rezistance
3 Likes
GRB, T-64A(1971), 9.3>9.0.
Lacks any modern equipment, making it unable to compete with vehicles at the same or higher BR. Its armor can be easily penetrated.
Leopard 2A4M 11.7 > 11.3 or give it DM53. It is the worst gift package in 11.3
They hardly provide a difference to the Italian version indeed.
Then you should understand in addition to the speed of movement on flat roads. They are almost at the bottom of the top.No depression angles, no protection, no firepower.
GRB, KV-1(ZiS-5), 4.7>4.3.
Can’t be in the same BR with KV-1 m1942.
The napalm bombs on the premium one can provide good SL and RP as you can get 3 bases with them…but IF. At this point you are slow sub sonic jet. Your team mates are sonic jets that can carry bombs so they can easily take the bases…and enemy? Enemy will meet you when you are half way to the middle of the map
I personally wpuldnt have an issue with the br it is at due to it having excelent mobility but the shell it has just cant compete with any of the other tanks at its br
Air realistic. F-14A IRIAF (USA). 12.7 > 13.3.
It’s an air-to-air combat with powerful missiles running at long distances and close range, and it has superior flight performance
GRB, IS-3, 7.3>7.0.
It performs poorly at higher BRs, can be easily penetrated by HEAT rounds, and has a long reload time.