Doing my job, uptiers i die in 5 seconds to a pehonix. downtiers i do ok but i just die to j7es at 11.0…
Air RB, MiG-27M/K. 11.3 → 11.0.
An MiG-23M/MF getting BR reduction, but the MiG-27M/K not is criminal.
The MiG-27M/K is worse than the MiG-23M/MF in ALL aspects. It does not have radar and no R-23/R-24 missiles. Only R-60M and R-13M-1, of which it can carry 2 and 1 respectively, for a total of 4/2.
It has better ground loadout, but that is no basis for higher BR in Air RB.
2 Likes
Israel F-4E(br11.3)and both two F-104S(br11.3) should move to 11.0 same as F-4EJ. Specially F-104S, it has nothing better than EJ expect little faster as fighterbomber
I’m taking the Type 10 over Leclercs any day. Much better reverse, better reload, better dart, similar armor.
2A6 → 2A7V
Germany got a much better UFP, with better thermals and spall lining.
M1A2 → M1A2 Sep V2
USA got better thermals and some cosmetic ERA (only really helps against heli atgms) on the side that weighs the tank down even more.
However, I don’t think adding M829A3 is a good idea.
Probably LFP armour package would’ve been fine.
Air Realistic F-4S Phantom II 12.0>11.7 maybe a bit lower
I think it would benefit the F-4s if it was moved down a bit so it doesn’t face F-14s as often, and at 12.0 almost everything has all aspect Ir missiles while it only has AIM-7Fs wich are good missiles but since you can only fire one at a time they arent as useful when you have 4 planes with better radar and ir missiles coming at you. Also now it can face most F-16s too wich have marginally better flight performance with almost everything else.
1 Like
Yes!!! Agreed, vautor without airspawn is a joke not aircraft
RAF Phantoms: 💀
2 Likes
ARB,F4F ICE,13.3>13.0.
The plane itself is bad.
1 Like
Lmao
Gen 3, actually!
2A6 → 2A7V is:
-3rd gen thermals instead of 1st gen.
-670mm KE instead of 430 on the hull.
-Reinforced UFP.
-Hull spall liners on top of the turret ones 2A6 already had.
And, as you said… M1A2 to SEPv2 is just 2nd gen thermals and cosmetic ERA that makes it slower.
M829A3 would pen 660mm if I recall correctly, so it’s not like it would be much better than the DM53 that the Leopards use.
Well of course it feels worse when you don’t know how to play the tank
Not sure about M829A3 since from what I can remember, it can effectively defeat relikt, which would make T-Series tanks very easy to kill.
Anti-ERA tip properties of shells are not modelled for any shell ingame, and so, wouldn’t be on M829A3.
Even the developers themselves stated oficially that “M829A3 would not change anything because it’s not very different from M829A2 or DM53 anyway”.
M829A3 would just be a slightly better DM53, with around 7mm more of pen. Given the numerous and enormous advantages the Leopard 2A7s have over the Abrams in terms of protection and survivability, I think it would be fair if the Abrams could at least be a proper glass canon in every way
as many low rank changes i think this is a issue skill
Don’t know how much M829A3 would help the Abrams perform better.
The main issue most USA mains have with the Abrams at the moment is its giant turret ring weakspot, and the LFP being easily penetrated.
T-90M has shitty reverse, pretty subpar mobility, a long reload and is pretty easy to one shot kill. It’s absolutely beyond easy to for the Abrams to dictate any engagement against a T-90M.
The T-90M is incredibly easy to fight against for any player who put at least 1 irl skillpoint into gamesense.
1 Like
None of which things will ever change. Even if the ring is fixed it won’t protect against main caliber APFSDS shells (would be around 280-300mm KE); and Gaijin actively refuses to improve the hull of any Abrams.
So the best bet is to go full glass-canon route by giving, at least SEPv3, its historical M829A3 shell choice which, as stated, wouldn’t change all that much, except it would feel nicer and be more effective against Kontakt-5-protected tanks.
MTI mode which you cannot be changed manually and only works below 1500m while pointing the radar downwards, 90km range but can only lock at 60km and you have to be higher than 1500m to change the range, it’s garbage. Dying to a R-23R you have to be either afk or bad. R-60Ms are pretty overrated you can dodge it in a head-on, it has 2km range from rear-aspect while going above mach 1. Also why are you only thinking about downtiers what about the uptiers 12.3 you have the M2K which laughs at you also F-14A/IRIAF at 12.0 you have the PD F-4 spam at 11.7 you have the MiG-23ML/MLD. I spaded the MiG-23M a few days ago most of your game is 11.7-12.0 beacuse of the premium black hole and those vehicles are miles better than the MiG-23M, So yes it’s a reasonable decision.
And at that point, I’d rather use the Type 10 tbh with you. 😂
You could give Americans M829A4 and they would still get 40% winrate, Giving tanks better darts as cope buffs never works…
1 Like