French RB BR changes:
- RB, M4A3 (105): 3.0 to 3.3. Same reasons as above mentioned SU-122, StuH 42 G, and US M4A3 (105).
General napoleon the prusso-russian coalition is throwing leopard 2a6s and T-80BVMs at us, what can we do?!
Air & Ground Realistic
J22-B
3.7 → 3.3
While this have some very good armaments, the plane itself is very bad. It is like you need to play it like a BnZ because it is not able to turn, however it have really poor energy retention and overheats instantly.
3 Likes
Id say type 10 is bit worse than leclerc because it’s inconsistent
More consistent in terms of failing to penetrate and dying to fueltanks
Abrams can never push an T-90M (if he’s competent) and won that fight. For one simple reason, Abrams would have to aim for his weakspot, T-90M doesnt.
Sabre.
Armour of Leclerc and Type 10 are quite similar
The Leclerc has better turret rotation speed than the Type 10, but the Type 10 gets much better reverse speed and better gun depression than Leclerc, along with a much better round and a 4.0s reload.
I think its time to play a TT out of the big 4 and challenge yourself, T-90Ms are hardly scary
If anything I found CR2s to be the most intimidating: those who played in it are probably the biggest tryhards
Air RB, MiG-23M/MF should KEEP its current BR 11.3 → 11.3 .
MiG-23M/MF going down to 11.0 is a bit questionable. It will be able to face planes such as the F-8E(FN), Mirage-IIIC and Shahak, where neither of them has flares/chaff. This will make clubbing them really easy, since there is not much they can do facing R-23T/Rs.
Ground RB, MiG-23M/MF 11.3 → 11.0. Instead here it should go to lower BR, since it does not have good ground loadout.
Doing my job, uptiers i die in 5 seconds to a pehonix. downtiers i do ok but i just die to j7es at 11.0…
Air RB, MiG-27M/K. 11.3 → 11.0.
An MiG-23M/MF getting BR reduction, but the MiG-27M/K not is criminal.
The MiG-27M/K is worse than the MiG-23M/MF in ALL aspects. It does not have radar and no R-23/R-24 missiles. Only R-60M and R-13M-1, of which it can carry 2 and 1 respectively, for a total of 4/2.
It has better ground loadout, but that is no basis for higher BR in Air RB.
2 Likes
Israel F-4E(br11.3)and both two F-104S(br11.3) should move to 11.0 same as F-4EJ. Specially F-104S, it has nothing better than EJ expect little faster as fighterbomber
I’m taking the Type 10 over Leclercs any day. Much better reverse, better reload, better dart, similar armor.
2A6 → 2A7V
Germany got a much better UFP, with better thermals and spall lining.
M1A2 → M1A2 Sep V2
USA got better thermals and some cosmetic ERA (only really helps against heli atgms) on the side that weighs the tank down even more.
However, I don’t think adding M829A3 is a good idea.
Probably LFP armour package would’ve been fine.
Air Realistic F-4S Phantom II 12.0>11.7 maybe a bit lower
I think it would benefit the F-4s if it was moved down a bit so it doesn’t face F-14s as often, and at 12.0 almost everything has all aspect Ir missiles while it only has AIM-7Fs wich are good missiles but since you can only fire one at a time they arent as useful when you have 4 planes with better radar and ir missiles coming at you. Also now it can face most F-16s too wich have marginally better flight performance with almost everything else.
1 Like
Yes!!! Agreed, vautor without airspawn is a joke not aircraft
RAF Phantoms: 💀
2 Likes
ARB,F4F ICE,13.3>13.0.
The plane itself is bad.
1 Like
Lmao
Gen 3, actually!
2A6 → 2A7V is:
-3rd gen thermals instead of 1st gen.
-670mm KE instead of 430 on the hull.
-Reinforced UFP.
-Hull spall liners on top of the turret ones 2A6 already had.
And, as you said… M1A2 to SEPv2 is just 2nd gen thermals and cosmetic ERA that makes it slower.
M829A3 would pen 660mm if I recall correctly, so it’s not like it would be much better than the DM53 that the Leopards use.