Air RB, F104s/ TAF. 11.3>11.0 or stay at 11.3. The mig 23 at 11.3 is an equivalent to this, its even better in most places apart from radar missiles. If the mig 23 is getting moved down then so should this or neither should get moved down.
3 Likes
Again, there’s no need to compete for who is worse, they’re all bad
Just saying that there is some armour on the Leclercs and Type 10s, whereas Ariete has none at all lol
That being said, Type 10 is better than the Leclerc, which is better than the Ariete.
And I think everyone can agree with this for the most part.
1 Like
At least the base bombers dont die to tomcats now, we just need to throw harder to get its BR further decreased
US RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, M4A3 (105): 3.0 to 3.3. Again, low tier monster. Armour might as well be a Jumbo in a 2.0 uptier.
1 Like
If Leclerc is the worst, what is VT4A1? All of China’s top tanks have a reload time of 7.1 seconds!
8 Likes
German RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, StuH 42 G: 3.0 to 3.3. Same story as the SU-122 and M4A3 (105).
French RB BR changes:
- RB, AMD.35 (SA35): 1.7 to 1.0. This thing is trash. It’s basically a side-grade to the 1.0 AMD 35.
4 Likes
Italian RB BR changes:
- RB, M15/42: 2.7 to 2.3. It’s really not a massive jump from the M13/40 (II), M13/40 (III), or M14/41. Very small jump in penetration, small jump in top speed and power-to-weight, and better hull armour. That’s pretty much it.
3 Likes
Sure ok, but where did that bring us ?
The type 10 and all the other MBT are just far superior to the trio of shame (Leclerc, Ariete, Challenger/MErkava)
Ah, yes. Resorting to insults because you don’t actually have a counterargument. Classic IvanBoo behavior.
The challenger needs its own tier like the british TT
Air & Ground Realistic
Canberra B Mk 2
8.3 → 8.0
Jet bomber that is reasonably slow for its BR, and is unarmed and cannot even run away from the enemies it is facing, which is the only form of defence it have. While it does have access to 2x4000lb bombs, they don’t make a lot of difference it ARB since you still are only able to destroy 1 base.
7 Likes
Air & Ground Realistic
B-57A
8.3 → 8.0
Jet bomber that is reasonably slow for its BR, and is unarmed and cannot even run away from the enemies it is facing, which is the only form of defence it have.
6 Likes
Air & Ground Realistic
Canberra B (I) Mk 6
8.3 → 8.0
It is a jet bomber that is reasonably slow, however because of its armament it looses its ability to being able to destroy a mini-base in one go, in exchange for 4x20mm Hispano. If you compare it to the B-57B, it has the ability to carry even more bombs and being even able to use incendiary bombs, so it is able to kill 1 if not more bases.
6 Likes
But the ram’s shell penetration is also lethal to the 99A, and the 99A can hardly kill the ram with a single hit, not to mention that the 99A’s reload is the slowest
4 Likes
Air & Ground Realistic
B-239
2.7 → 3.3
This is very powerful for its BR, it nearly out-turns the early spitfires, and it have a good climb rate at that. Its 4x .50 cal, easily shreds anything it fights, be it air targets or ground targets.
1 Like
Sea Vixen in GRB should go from 8.7 to 9.0
Like the scimitar (where it can outaccelerate most things at its own BR, including 9.0), has insane energy-retention, and gets access to two bullpups, along with 4x slightly better Aim-9Bs or 4x 1000lbs dumb bombs.
Well… Tornado Gr1, ASSTA1 and A200A can all still see F-14s and so Can both the F-111C/F.
As well as most F-4s, especially the premium ones. So nothing has really changed that much on that front.
though none of those should have any issues dealing with Aim-54s.
Only the 11.3 Tornados and Su-24 will be free of them