Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

GRB, 12.0 > 12.7.

Honestly, let’s all be real here; increasing the ground BR to just 12.0, after years of it being stuck at 11.7 (whilst air was recently increased to 13.7) won’t do THAT much to decompress the match-maker. Sure, this KIND OF saved 9.3, but what about BR’s like 8.0, which are absolutely insufferable to play as of right now? 6.7 is also a very mid BR, considering the constant uptiers to 7.7, not to mention the overall lack of 7.7 vehicles across the board - thanks to which, nations like the UK and France absolutely dominate others with their expansive 7.7 lineups. At this point, we’re more likely to get 14.7 air before 12.7 ground. 6.0 is also eh.

I mean, yeah, 12.0 is a step in the right direction, but this only solved the 9.3 issue.

5 Likes

Type 10’s armour isn’t even that bad tbh. Just as good as the Leclerc’s in most cases.

1 Like

Well Leclerc doesn’t have any so that’s not really a surprise

GRB, ZTZ-99A, 12.0>11.3.
With a 7.1-second reload that’s slower than any enemy, unreliable armor, and no clear advantage in mobility. This also happens to WZ-1001(LCT) and VT-4A1, if they need to be in 12.0, the reloading time should reduce to 6.5s

39 Likes

Ariete doesn’t have any, leclerc has some.

The leclerc has that “IQ check” armored area on its cheeks which are like inpenetrable. Well, its still better than the type 10 on paper, but only against autocannons, something thats lower than a begeleit or 2s38 too.

3 Likes

bro, two spots on the turret can sometimes stop a round, that’s not armour

It’s some armour lol

Sure, just like a medieval shield in a machinegun fight …

I would say all the attackers need to go back down to their original BR, especially if Gaijin isn’t going to give them their forward spawn. That was the original plan. They go up in BR but get a forward spawn to stay viable. Only one part of that happened. The Su-25/K and A-10 Early/Late should definitely be lowered back.



💀💀💀

Air RB, F104s/ TAF. 11.3>11.0 or stay at 11.3. The mig 23 at 11.3 is an equivalent to this, its even better in most places apart from radar missiles. If the mig 23 is getting moved down then so should this or neither should get moved down.

3 Likes

Again, there’s no need to compete for who is worse, they’re all bad

Just saying that there is some armour on the Leclercs and Type 10s, whereas Ariete has none at all lol
That being said, Type 10 is better than the Leclerc, which is better than the Ariete.
And I think everyone can agree with this for the most part.

1 Like

At least the base bombers dont die to tomcats now, we just need to throw harder to get its BR further decreased

US RB Ground BR’s:

- RB, M4A3 (105): 3.0 to 3.3. Again, low tier monster. Armour might as well be a Jumbo in a 2.0 uptier.

1 Like

If Leclerc is the worst, what is VT4A1? All of China’s top tanks have a reload time of 7.1 seconds!

8 Likes

German RB Ground BR’s:

- RB, StuH 42 G: 3.0 to 3.3. Same story as the SU-122 and M4A3 (105).

French RB BR changes:

- RB, AMD.35 (SA35): 1.7 to 1.0. This thing is trash. It’s basically a side-grade to the 1.0 AMD 35.

4 Likes

Italian RB BR changes:

- RB, M15/42: 2.7 to 2.3. It’s really not a massive jump from the M13/40 (II), M13/40 (III), or M14/41. Very small jump in penetration, small jump in top speed and power-to-weight, and better hull armour. That’s pretty much it.

3 Likes