Ground Realistic
T28
6.3 → 6.7
It is a T95 at 6.3, it should be a lot closer in BR to quite litteraly the same tank. While i have no experince in either vehicle, it makes no sense why there is such a big difference in BR between the two vehicles.
1 Like
It isnt really better… even with the f1 you can lol pen it everywhere, the only “good” thing about the protection is that the crew sits relatively low comprared to the gun barrel, but the armor itself is dogshit
That’s why i’m saying that this argument is going nowhere since they have very different gameplays.
The Type 90 is a better comparison
The Ags should get m900 if it moves up. Or it should stay at its current br
1 Like
Yeah and that playstyle means that the Leclerc fits better in the meta than the Merkava.
Would be if the penetration was better though. You have a hard time penetrating a lot of things while they just have to look in your general direction to kill you
what does supposed to mean?
I literally play the ariete and its better.
If whataboutism is going to be used, leclercs, ZTZ99A and its variants as well as the CR2 are the worst few.
1 Like
Pave spike is used to designate laser GBU,it can’t be useless
Datalink pod is used in real life because Martel is a man-in-loop weapon and datalink is needed to communicate between missile and plane.Gaijin wrongly made it a maverick-like in game, so why the pod is needed. AN/AXQ-14 pod isn’t on F-111 or A-7, why buccaneer?
We don’t know yet. However looks like Warrior is also getting it changed.
Ground Realistic
Spj fm/43-44
1.7 → 2.0
It is actually deceivingly well armored for its BR, and at the same time it have a gun that can easily one shot enemy targets. While it can be overpressured, there is not a lot of people who are carrying HE at the BR it is at, and hitting the front of the hull with HE will not kill the gun crew.
You need a separate comment for each vehicle or it will not be considered
The Merkava only has like 20mm more pen, is a bigger target with just as little armor.
The Leclerc has a lot more going for it in the current meta.
1 Like
Why is the Pantsir S1 still the same as the BR in the top air defense of other tech trees? Before, it was because the top was 11.7, but now it’s because the Armor S1 is not outstanding enough?
1 Like
Well then that just means that both of them should stay at 11.7, I really don’t know why we’re competing to know which one is the worst when things like Leopards 2 and Type 90 are in the game at the same br
add M900 or 5s per round replenish rate in 11.3
or stay at 11.0
or remove M833 at 10.7
1 Like
If it is extremely useful, why are ZTZ99As being played so cautiously it always aim to oneshot its foes instead of gambling a breech/barrel?
Its dart is the second worst as well.
2 Likes
Ground Realistic
M4A3 (105)
3.0 → 3.3
Extremly armored for its br, a lot of things can do nothing against it frontally, and it have at the same time very good mobility for its armor at the BR.
1 Like
The ZTZ99A is not in the talks of being in the bottom 5 lol, hell I think I would struggle to put it in the bottom 10.
It’s a solid middle of the pack MBT.
1 Like
Ground Realistic
M4A3 (105) (France)
3.0 → 3.3
Extremly armored for its br, a lot of things can do nothing against it frontally, and it have at the same time very good mobility for its armor at the BR.