Oh great so now the Leclerc is literally THE worst top tier.
Autoloader that doesn’t change anything since now everyone reloads in 5 sec
Worst survivability
Worst round
FFS when is someone going to realise that the Leclerc are 11.3 at best ??
1 Like
The arietes and the merkavas are still worse.
In what way ?
you forgot the challys as well, the chally still still has the 6 second reload…
Your FM is superior to the Mirage 5F in everyway possible.
Mirage 5F is the worst DELTA FM wise in all the game.
Guns? We have the same.
Magic-1? I got my stats when the Mirage was 10.3, which makes it fight MiG-23’s R-23T and R-60M,… so can’t escape speed wise, can’t turn Magic-1 their ass thanks to Large caliber flares they had, and can’t survive 5km+ range R-23T missiles.
You’re making yourself a fool if you think that Milan has no way to deal anything at it’s BR of 9.7
You’re a Mach 2 capable fighter able to fight down to 8.7 subsonic no missile and bad acceleration aircrafts. And your only problem is AIM-9L that you found only on A-10A’s which are slow and low.
A-10’s when they come out, were my current farming tool in either Mirage F.1C and Mirage 5F.
But yeah sure… you’ve been sweaty in doing it all wrong.
The turret of the leclerc at leas have some protection compared to the arietes and merkavas and much better mobility
Challys are pretty sad indeed, but still they can do hulldown at least
British RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, A1E1 Independent: 1.3 down to 1.0. Terrible armour for a heavy tank, worse than many nations light tanks even at 1.0. Terrible mobility. Massive target. 3-Pdr gun isn’t a redeeming factor either, it’s not the worst gun in the game, but due to all the other factors combined it’s made much worse.
- RB, SARC IVa: 1.3 down to 1.0. It’s fast, and that’s kinda it. If you compare it to the Daimler it shares a BR with, it loses in almost every respect. Worse armour, no shoulder stabiliser, gun is incredibly bouncy and kicks like a mule after firing, worse gun elevation and depression angles, and it’s open-topped.
- RB, Churchill Mk. I: 3.3 down to 3.0. The 2-Pdr is horrendous at this point, mainly due to the lack of mobility to flank. Even taking it in downtiers it struggles to penetrate Pz. IV F2’s with add-on track armour, Pz. III M’s, M4A1’s, T-34’s, etc.
- RB, Crusader AA Mk II: 4.0 down to 3.7. I don’t understand why this vehicle even went up. Just compare it to the Wirbelwind, far less rate-of-fire, less penetration, and half the guns. The only advantage the Crusader AA Mk. II has is an enclosed turret and more mobility. The 2 were very asymmetrically balanced.
- RB, Churchill Mk. III: 4.0 down to 3.7. Less mobility than the Churchill Mk. I, same hull armour, and worse turret armour (only 3.5 inches compared to 4 inches). The gun is better, but that’s it. It’s also the same gun that’s on the AEC Mk. II at 3.0.
- RB, Churchill NA75: 4.3 down to 4.0. It’s more of a side-grade over the Churchill Mk. III, not a direct upgrade. You lose the good rate-of-fire, lose the shoulder stabiliser, and lose a decent amount of penetration for a better damaging shell. That’s the only difference, the shell is good but if the Churchill Mk. III goes down then the NA75 should as well.
- RB, Comet: 5.3 down to 5.0. It’s really a shadow of its former self. The A30 Challenger is a better vehicle in almost everyway. Just compare it to the VK 3002 (M).
- RB, AC IV: 5.3 down to 5.0. It’s just a better Firefly. Again, just compare it to the VK 3002 (M).
- RB, Skink: 5.3 down to 4.7. Just like the Crusader AA Mk. II really don’t understand why it keeps going up. Again, just compare it to the Wirbelwind, you still have less firepower and penetration but now have the double the guns of the Crusader AA Mk. II, and the same amount of guns as the Whirbelwind. Is that really worth a BR increase of 1.3 currently (4.0 to 5.3)?
- RB, Tortoise: 6.7 down to 6.3. Just compare it to the T28, very similar vehicles except the Tortoise is covered in weakspots, lacks APHE, and just as slow.
- RB, Falcon: 8.3 down to 7.7. Just remove the APDS and/or adjust the belts. There’s now 3 British SPAA’s at 8.3 now, what’s the point? The Falcon has no radar and should be lower. Just compare it to the ZSU-37-2 and the VEAK 40 which have similar shells and radar, yet both are 7.7.
- RB, Chieftain Mk 3: 8.7 down to 8.3. The Chieftain Mk 5 has far better mobility and top speed, and sometime soon will get a LRF. This makes the Chieftain Mk 3 feel more like a heavy tank in comparison but only with decent armour when hull down.
Swedish RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, SAV 20.12.48: 3.7 to 4.0. This vehicle is a monster. Not much else to be said really.
Soviet RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, SU-122: 2.7 to 3.0. This, and the two vehicles below are incredibly powerful. Especially against new players. You see entire squads of SU-122, M4A3 (105), and StuH 42 G when playing these BR’s.
US RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, M4A3 (105): 3.0 to 3.3. Again, low tier monster. Armour might as well be a Jumbo in a 2.0 uptier.
German RB Ground BR’s:
- RB, StuH 42 G: 3.0 to 3.3. Same story as the SU-122 and M4A3 (105).
French RB BR changes:
- RB, AMD.35 (SA35): 1.7 to 1.0. This thing is trash. It’s basically a side-grade to the 1.0 AMD 35.
- RB, M4A3 (105): 3.0 to 3.3. Same reasons as above mentioned SU-122, StuH 42 G, and US M4A3 (105).
Italian RB BR changes:
- RB, M15/42: 2.7 to 2.3. It’s really not a massive jump from the M13/40 (II), M13/40 (III), or M14/41. Very small jump in penetration, small jump in top speed and power-to-weight, and better hull armour. That’s pretty much it.
1 Like
Not really, thier biggest weak-spot is thier mantlet. One shot thier and either half your crews gone or your entire crews gone, no in-between.
1 suggestion per comments, otherwise they won’t take it into consideration.
Have you played it ? Without even mentioning the enormous weakspots, the “protection” can be penned by most rounds.
Sure it has some mobility because it has literally nothing else. And what’s the point of being fast if you just die without being able to pen anything ?
So I have to do like 20 comments?
Yep, it is what i have done so far.
Well that’s even worse on a Leclerc … enormous weakspot + only 3 crew members means ANY shot will one shot you
Plus your also ugly, i cant imagine having to play while looking at the back of it, and thats probably the best part about it.
Buddy have you played the arietes? The hole tank is a weakspot, even the turret of the leclerc can stop some runds at top tier like the 3bm60, btw i have all leclercs unloked, and the s1 and s2, aced.
you forgot that F4ej’s missiles use CW signal (meaning they aint decoyed by chaff meaning that you essentially have same PD capability as m23 at higher altitudes) and that aim 9P is much more resistant to flares than the R-60M (i heard that aim9p is similar to aim9J and aim9j is similar to Flz Lfw 64/80, and i used Flz Lfw and if fired properly it wont be decoyed by flares.)
There really is no reason to put any of the current 11.7 MBTs at the same BR as the 2A7s/122s lol.
9ps are pretty flare resistant but you still have to fire within a 1km for it to come into effect. And what do u mean by CW? CW cant be used at low alt so its a negative…
Ok I give you this one, the Ariete sucks badly, and it’s maybe the worst top tier, but clearly not the Merkava.
Problem is that the Leclerc suffers from the same armour problems while having less crew which brings it on the same level of “uselessness”.
And then what’s the point of having an autoloader if the thing realoads just as fast as everyone else ?