Have you played it ? Without even mentioning the enormous weakspots, the “protection” can be penned by most rounds.
Sure it has some mobility because it has literally nothing else. And what’s the point of being fast if you just die without being able to pen anything ?
So I have to do like 20 comments?
Yep, it is what i have done so far.
Well that’s even worse on a Leclerc … enormous weakspot + only 3 crew members means ANY shot will one shot you
Plus your also ugly, i cant imagine having to play while looking at the back of it, and thats probably the best part about it.
Buddy have you played the arietes? The hole tank is a weakspot, even the turret of the leclerc can stop some runds at top tier like the 3bm60, btw i have all leclercs unloked, and the s1 and s2, aced.
you forgot that F4ej’s missiles use CW signal (meaning they aint decoyed by chaff meaning that you essentially have same PD capability as m23 at higher altitudes) and that aim 9P is much more resistant to flares than the R-60M (i heard that aim9p is similar to aim9J and aim9j is similar to Flz Lfw 64/80, and i used Flz Lfw and if fired properly it wont be decoyed by flares.)
There really is no reason to put any of the current 11.7 MBTs at the same BR as the 2A7s/122s lol.
9ps are pretty flare resistant but you still have to fire within a 1km for it to come into effect. And what do u mean by CW? CW cant be used at low alt so its a negative…
Ok I give you this one, the Ariete sucks badly, and it’s maybe the worst top tier, but clearly not the Merkava.
Problem is that the Leclerc suffers from the same armour problems while having less crew which brings it on the same level of “uselessness”.
And then what’s the point of having an autoloader if the thing realoads just as fast as everyone else ?
The turret of the merkava is arguably weaker as well, also the leclerc is much more mobile.
I would still gladly take a Leclerc over a Merkava. Smaller profile and better gun depression while neither of them can really rely on armor and survivability.
yea no
A vehicle’s lineup should have no say on the vehicle’s BR, only the raw performance of the vehicle should matter. One way to do this is by adding certain things, or removing certain things from a vehicle to make it a higher or lower BR than previously, which in turn allows the vehicle to be used in a lineup.
With that being said, the VFM5 should definitely stay at 9.3, as the XM8 is not being moved up to 10.0 (from 9.7), and it gets gen one thermals, an 8% increase in power-to-weight than the VFM5 (31.25hp/ton compared to 29.04hp/ton), and gets a 5.0s reload instead of a 6.7s reload (which requires ACE crew to obtain). The XM8 also has a slightly better turret rotation speed (36° per second, instead of 34° per second), all for a slightly better dart.
CW is a constant wave signal - yes, it cant be used at low altitude (unless you are close), but there are plenty of jets flying high
The KF41 has low armor, survivability, and attack power, and the current 10.7 (11.0 after the update) is a bit unjustified
1 Like
Mobility isn’t useful when your gun can’t pen anything. The Type 10 is what the Leclerc should be, no armour but fast, very nice reload and good round.
The mobility could be an advantage if it at least got a new round
That’s more likely just a preference in gameplay, but you can’t tell me that both are on the same br when the Leclerc does everything worse except for mobility
It is extremely useful…
GRB T-90A 11.0>10.7, Take away 3BM60 and make it the same BR as T-90S Bhishma.