GRB、Pantsir S1 、11.7 > 12.0， It was so strong that made other SPAA seems like a rubbish。
4 Likes
GRB、Pantsir S1 、11.7 > 12.0， It was so strong that made other SPAA seems like a joker。
3 Likes
Oh yeah. However some of the Mig 21s at 11.3 were way too high of a BR. I might just be bad at the 21 BIS but that thing seems to suck at 11.3. But that doesn’t mean it should go down like it is now lol
GRB、Pantsir S1 、11.7 > 12.0， It was so strong that made other SPAA seems like a rubbish。
3 Likes
@Stona_WT : when can we expect to see a first approach of Feedback approval/disapproval on this matter.
To see what Gaijin is ok with what we told, and eventually contest, feedback more depending on the integrated feedback?
This would help to avoid some spam commentary, and get people to work all around together.
1 Like
I can notch, fly below 50m AND spam chaff and still get killed by a AIM54/Fakour-90 by it hitting the ground and it blowing my wing off from 50-100m away. Fox 3 shouldn’t see non fox 3 capable planes.
Realistic. AH-1W (Both USA and China). 11.0>10.7 .don’t move them up in BR, let them stay at 10.7, they are basically the same as G-LYNX, A-129CBT and all the others who will get moved to 10.7.
2 Likes
Vehicles without thermal should not be 9.7 +
I dont know the rocket science used to the BR changes (because its clear its not applying what was mentioned in the past) - but some technological limitations should have been considered.
1 Like
(RB) Leave A5-С on BR 10.3. it has a small number of flares, only two rear-aspect missiles, lacks any maneuverability - it flies “on rails”, and has a rate of climb with the dynamics of the current aircraft. already leave much to be desired.
Many players recently bought it at a discount (on the day of the People’s Republic of China) and you immediately nerfing it looks like a mockery.
4 Likes
Welcome and happy first post.
Formalities aside, if they were clear about what the change entailed originally then we wouldn’t need to speculate.
What has me concerned is that it’s listed as only effecting the Fox, not the Warrior, which uses the same gun, or a couple other vehicles that use the same shell in different guns.
Now this could simply be an oversight, but the fact that the Fox is known to be a controversial vehicle in its own right, moreso currently than any of the other vehicles this could effect, makes me think it might be an arbitrary, reactionary, and inconsistent change intended to nerf the Fox without changing its BR.
If this is, as listed, a genuine recalculation of the shell itself then it should effect more than just the Fox. If they want to effect just the Fox then they should change its BR, which I do not want them to do, but would find it the lesser of two evils if those are the options at hand.
2 Likes
It seems they asked for a post saying a car
The L might still be a little crazy. maybe the Spike but then again that has a 20km range and was only used on the AH-64D blockIII(now know as AH-64E).
A good in between would be to give them AGM-65s they are able to carry them.
The t90m has better protection
You mean the second shot for T-80BVM?
For that one yeah should’ve aimed at his tracks but that’s besides the point, I was showcasing the T-90M encounter, he shot but missed, I shot but didn’t missed yet he survived. Also wouldn’t T-80BVM fuel tanks explode all the time? That’s what Russian players claim but yet to see that happening. Bet you call this skill issue as well. A “Critical Hit” with nothing being damaged lol.
F4J-UK AAB 11.7/ARB 12.0 > AAB 11.3/ARB 11.7
The UK variant without all aspects is in the same bracket as the F4s with better missiles, and a better flight model, we have the Kurnass 2000 at 12.0/12.3 slinging python 3’s and even then it’s not dominating. If the phantoms stay at 11.7/12.0 give them the 9l’s, otherwise drop them down.
ZTZ99A 11.7->11.3
Reason: Poor protection, slowest reload time, only 577mm shell penetration, just recently, the main armor of the ZTZ99A was weakened by 200KE, and GAIJIN did not come up with any reason. This is not an emotionally charged report, but a fact.
78 Likes
VT4A1 11.7->11.3
Until now, the armor module of the VT4A1 has not been corrected, and it does not have an advantage in maneuverability or protection compared to the other two top Chinese tanks. If the weight is to be increased, the VT4A1 must be strengthened in some ways, such as fixing armor errors, reducing reload time, and adding a BTA-4 armor-piercing projectile with a penetration depth of 600mm at 0m (data from the Zhuhai exhibition)
95 Likes
Air Realistic, F4F ICE 13.3 > 13.0
This aircraft is marketed as cream of the crop for german air tree at the moment, and at the same time it lacks basically everything that good modern jet should be. While the flare count is ok-ish the flight performance is not, combine that with only 4 aim-120s and 4 worse aim-9ms it really is struggle jet. It’s main intended role is to be sniper of ARB. But the 13.3 is sort of crazy in my opinion as it is just constant uptiers where you face much better enemies. Therefore lowering it to 13.0 would make it more similar to currently available av-8B+ which is not over performing at it’s BR while having equal amount of aim-120s. After all, while yes it is still jet with fox-3 missiles, the 0.3 BR difference is really notable and this jet does not really belong to the top tier.
4 Likes
Again, if 99A were to increase the level, it would have to get some enhancements. For example, reducing reload time, correcting armor errors, armor error reports have been submitted and passed, and the main armor area of 99A should be at least 800KE.
61 Likes
F-4F is not outclassed by J-7D. J-7E yes, J-7D no.
4 Likes