It seems they asked for a post saying a car
The L might still be a little crazy. maybe the Spike but then again that has a 20km range and was only used on the AH-64D blockIII(now know as AH-64E).
A good in between would be to give them AGM-65s they are able to carry them.
The t90m has better protection
You mean the second shot for T-80BVM?
For that one yeah should’ve aimed at his tracks but that’s besides the point, I was showcasing the T-90M encounter, he shot but missed, I shot but didn’t missed yet he survived. Also wouldn’t T-80BVM fuel tanks explode all the time? That’s what Russian players claim but yet to see that happening. Bet you call this skill issue as well. A “Critical Hit” with nothing being damaged lol.
F4J-UK AAB 11.7/ARB 12.0 > AAB 11.3/ARB 11.7
The UK variant without all aspects is in the same bracket as the F4s with better missiles, and a better flight model, we have the Kurnass 2000 at 12.0/12.3 slinging python 3’s and even then it’s not dominating. If the phantoms stay at 11.7/12.0 give them the 9l’s, otherwise drop them down.
ZTZ99A 11.7->11.3
Reason: Poor protection, slowest reload time, only 577mm shell penetration, just recently, the main armor of the ZTZ99A was weakened by 200KE, and GAIJIN did not come up with any reason. This is not an emotionally charged report, but a fact.
78 Likes
VT4A1 11.7->11.3
Until now, the armor module of the VT4A1 has not been corrected, and it does not have an advantage in maneuverability or protection compared to the other two top Chinese tanks. If the weight is to be increased, the VT4A1 must be strengthened in some ways, such as fixing armor errors, reducing reload time, and adding a BTA-4 armor-piercing projectile with a penetration depth of 600mm at 0m (data from the Zhuhai exhibition)
95 Likes
Air Realistic, F4F ICE 13.3 > 13.0
This aircraft is marketed as cream of the crop for german air tree at the moment, and at the same time it lacks basically everything that good modern jet should be. While the flare count is ok-ish the flight performance is not, combine that with only 4 aim-120s and 4 worse aim-9ms it really is struggle jet. It’s main intended role is to be sniper of ARB. But the 13.3 is sort of crazy in my opinion as it is just constant uptiers where you face much better enemies. Therefore lowering it to 13.0 would make it more similar to currently available av-8B+ which is not over performing at it’s BR while having equal amount of aim-120s. After all, while yes it is still jet with fox-3 missiles, the 0.3 BR difference is really notable and this jet does not really belong to the top tier.
4 Likes
Again, if 99A were to increase the level, it would have to get some enhancements. For example, reducing reload time, correcting armor errors, armor error reports have been submitted and passed, and the main armor area of 99A should be at least 800KE.
61 Likes
F-4F is not outclassed by J-7D. J-7E yes, J-7D no.
4 Likes
Then lower the F3 Late down to 13.0 as well and then move the FA2 down to 12.7 because it shouldn’t be the same BR as the F4F-ICE
Just because some idiots claim this doesn’t mean it’s true. There are also a lot of idiots claiming that the Abrams isn’t a very capable tank, but that doesn’t make that true either.
But yes, what you showed could have been an easy kill shot with a bit more aim.
FA.2 can be the same BR. Not every vehicle is going to have a giant niche at its BR and its best to not put amraams lower than 13.0 for obvious reasons
Su-25Т/39 - 11.7 - 11.3 ARB
Planes are not played comfortably on BR 11.7 from the word at all. It seems that separate BRS were introduced just to increase the playability of assaults in the ARB, but in the end we have that on the rook with 2 R-73 without HMS and SARH missiles (which, by the way, were installed on them) We are playing against MiG-29 and F-16A with SARH missiles and excellent Flight characteristics, and MiG-21 Bison with P-73 and HMS with SARH missiles. I would like to note that the Su-25T shares 11.7 with the MiG-23, which is compared to the I-15 and La-9, respectively.
3 Likes
why do these tanks still have to be in the same BR as T80BVM, strv122, and Leo A7? their performance is only worth 11.0. unless gaijin provides them with a reasonable buff.
demonstration:
the slowest loading speed(7.1), the worst shell penetration(577) , have some, but very poor armor.
compared to the T90A/ZTZ99-2/3, their only advantage is mobility. but the defense is worse.
similar to M1A1AIM . but M1A1AIM is superior to them anywhere except for armor. 5-second loading speed, with a penetration of nearly 600mm.now it has also obtained M829A2.
due to not have hull ammunition racks and the presence of four crew members. M1 can often survive even after being penetrated. and 99A/1001/VT4 will immediately die after being penetrated.
they are not worth 12.0 at all, they are only worth 11.0.
but Gaijin was completely unaware of this issue. this is really rotten.
why don’t you put T3476 and Tiger in the same BR?ZTZ99A/WZ1001(E)/VT4A1 11.7->11.3
Reason: Poor protection, slowest reload time, only 577mm shell penetration, just recently, the main armor of the ZTZ99A was weakened by 200KE, and GAIJIN did not come up with any reason. This is not an emotionally charged report, but a fact. Think about it! If you’ve ever played with the tanks of the Chinese faction, you’ll think I’m right.
19 Likes
why don’t you put T3476 and Tiger in the same BR?ZTZ99A/WZ1001(E)/VT4A1 11.7->11.3
Reason: Poor protection, slowest reload time, only 577mm shell penetration, just recently, the main armor of the ZTZ99A was weakened by 200KE, and GAIJIN did not come up with any reason. This is not an emotionally charged report, but a fact. Think about it! If you’ve ever played with the tanks of the Chinese faction, you’ll think I’m right.
18 Likes
The M1A1 AIM is still stuck with KE-W, it’s not getting M829A2
Realistic Battles, Leopard 2a4 all nations . 10.7 add DM33 Reasoning: in this br the 120mm cannon with the dm23, is so weak, this source tell the leopard 2a4 can carry the DM33. https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2008/gun_missile/6526Huls.pdf
Leclerc S1 and S2: are now Tier 7 and not 8 and are very inferior to a simple Abrams 1A1 who are 11.0 or a T80U, Type 90 etc… with bugged and no modelised armor Hull and weaker turret than IRL!
Put them to 11.0 please it is so evident no place at 11.7!
; Its so evident
1 Like
Yeah but we have a gigantic list of bug reports for chieftains and info on them, mk 4 mk5/4. Mk8. Mk3/8 and ofc the mk11, and the mk900 which was the prototype with what was supposed to be chobham armour…
Which could be 11.3 or 11.7
1 Like