The T-90M is only a good tank against below average or bad players. It’s pretty easy to take out for any above average players.
And yes, the Abrams are far more capable in somewhat experieced player’s hands than the T-90M can ever dream to be.
It’s firepower is meh, it’s mobility is meh, it’s armor is decent and it’s survivability depends on enemy aim.
Actually, yes.
Since the AH64D Apache for USA and AH Mk1 Apache for Britain are going up from 11.7 to 12.0 i think its time to give them the hellfire missile they went into service with the AGM-114L because its long over due and plus Germany for quite some time has had the pars 3 which is fire and forget missile and Israel has there black hawk with spikes. I think its time to allow the Apache to get there first fire and forget missiles the AGM-114L !!
This one is good. Leopard 2a4 is one of my favorite tanks because how good this tank is for its BR. Moving it up with rest of other tanks is fully justified. If you feel this tank is not good enough than problem is you and not the tank.
If the other vehicles are going up and they stay they would effectively go down, and the 99A remains the 2nd fastest MBT in the entire game, literally no other MBT at top tier has its level of tactical mobility, which is entirely why it stays relatively strong despite its armour model still being wrong despite being reworked over and over to begin with.
RB.J7W1 lower combat rating 6.0>5.7. No maneuverability, speed and climb relative to aircraft with combat rating 6.0 and 5.7
you got clear shot for his ammo why whoudn’t you take it? bad aim on your part, clearly
I mean it’s not the tank’s fault that you can’t go positive in your abrams, neither is it because the BVM and 90Ms are so good. I one shot them all the time when I play my top tier US lineup (given I haven’t played US top tier too much lately, I mostly spend the last few weeks grind france ground and Israel air).
RB.N1K2 reduce the combat rating 6.0>5.7,because we have Yak 3 U and Yak 3 VK 107, as well as Spitfire LF 9 have 5.7.
T-62 8.7 > 8.3. It has nothing going for it, everything else at 8.7 have better mobility, armour, LRF or thermals, this is just slightly better T-55A without 12.7mm, which make it worse imo.
really? There is no difference between G6 and G14 because G14 is a unified G6. 5.3 → 4.7
Ground realistic, Somua SM. 7.7 > 7.3
Well, let’s talk about the French…The Somua SM should have a reduced BR and in the French tech tree and is not alone (Lorraine 40t, AMX-50 TOA100…). The main problem is that the French autoloader is inadequately blindly sent straight up and disadvantaged to 7.7, without taking into account the other specs of the tank in question. Compare for example the Somua SM and the Tiger II (H). In terms of armour (both have a hull front of 150mm), speed or gun power, they are pretty much the same tank. Somua SM has an autoloader, but Tiger II has better projectile. The two tanks are still separated by a significant difference in BR 1.0. I don’t want the Somua SM to have a BR of 6.7 either, but 7.3 sounds fair (the mighty American T32 is also at 7.3). Plus the reality in the uptier is very cruel for this tank. If the Somua SM at 8.7 is supposed to fight the Soviets like the T-55AMD1 with stabilizer, APFSDS and missile protection, that seems absolutely insane and unreasonable to me. The fact that tanks at 6.7 experienced decompression and were relieved is great, but moving some tanks to 7.7 (French, Centurions etc) without further higher decompression was ill thought out, ill considered and short sighted. Please correct this oversight and think about whether some tanks should go back to 7.3 after all, or please at least consider further decompression around BR 8-9. Thanks.
RB.Re 2005 reduce combat rating 6.0>5.7 (analogous to spitfire lf 9, but worse)
The penetration ability of the Stug IIIa and Panzer IV F1 and previous makes them kinda hard to be reduced.
Those are great tanks overall.
RB.bf 109 g10 reduce combat rating 5.7>5.3, because we have bf 109 k 4 with the same combat rating, but with better characteristics
11.3 fighting non flare capable 10.3 10.7 11.0 is fair to you when the 9M you carry does have no smoke?
No way you can keep tracking of every A-10C when you’re already in fight with 2 MiG-21,…
The A-10C is too low BR, and should get up by 1 step.
AB,RB,SB - 2S38 - 10.0 > 10.7 - That vehicle has everything at this battle rating. LWS,LR,Apfsds and he-vt. Tank killer, plane killer, heli killer, drone killer… That vehicle can kill everything at that br. This vehicle needs to be raised. Effective against everything.
I know thats premium vehicle, You want to sell this premium vehicle but needs a nerf.
RB, J6K1, 6.7 → 6.3
This vehicle has absolutely not business being at a higher BR than the P-51H.#
This is one of the most extreme cases where the majority of players are very experienced and thus push the stats to much higher values than the plane could achieve in average hands.
Seems like skill issue as i’m playing the slower Mirage 5F which is perfectly avle to reach bases, bomb them and dogfight any aircraft at it’s BR.
To be honest, a Delta aircraft is not for everyone as many forgot the key feature of it
You need to plan route and stay away until bases respawns.
AIM-120 aren’t going to be any lower in BR wise, at least for an aircraft capable to launch them at high speed.
Same have been done with Magic-1 and -2 for long time (still done today, with Magic-1 unable to go lower than 10.0 and Magic-2 under 12.3)