Naval RB, MS-473 (3.0 → 2.7), wooden Italian boat with 2 40 mm Bofors L60 cannons, the platform is too outdated for 3.0 BR, poor survivability, very limited angles of turrets, below average speed, bad stability.
ARB, Su-25T/Su-39. 11.7 > 11.3 . Why should they be higher BR than Su-25BM if they are basically the same or even worse in terms of ARB?
No at all, only bad thing about T-90M is the horrific reverse speed, other than that it’s one of the most armored tanks in the game with both Relikt ERA’s and Spall Liners. It still has decent mobility and good turret traverse. I’d place 0.3 higher just because of Spall Liners alone, it basically gives you an extra life even though the enemy did place his shot correctly, it’s completely unfair advantage.
ARB. Su-25SM3. 12.3>11.3. I mean are you nuts? In terms of ARB it’s like giving Su-25T MAW and moving it to 12.3. It doesn’t make any sense.
hell no, just make the a10 12.3, no plane with IRCCM missile should be any lower than 12.0
1 Like
you are delusional my friend, spall liner on T-90M not doing a thing cuz of small inner space, it’s not like on Leopards where it gives a clear advantage over not having one…
RB.Is it possible to lower the combat rating of the G 55S 5.0>4.7 due to its characteristics (extremely low speed in the horizon, overheating and lack of flaps), as well as the deterioration of the MG 151 belts (self-destructor distance 1200 m).
1 Like
there is a clear difference between R-73 and Aim-9M, which you should know if you played any ARB and there is no sense keeping a plane with 2 R-73 and MAW on 12.3
RB.Change the combat rating of the Fw 190 A5 4.7>4.3 which now has a strong overheating taking into account the extremely bad climb as well as the detrioration of the MG 151 (self-destructor distance 1200 m) or remove overheating.
2 Likes
With the HSTVL going up from 11.3 to 11.7 it will need much better apfsds round’s and since it has limited ammunition of 26 rounds i think at the absolutely minimum it should get delta 3 apfsds are even delta 6 apfsds !!
RB.La 11 change the combat rating 5.3>4.7, due to the fact that it is completely useless, because in terms of total flight characteristics it is worse than La 7 (or change the flight model)
2 Likes
RB.Ki 87 combat rating 5.7>5.0, because it is not competitive with other aircraft 5.7, and also because of the change in belts on the Ho-155 it became even worse.
3 Likes
I’ve should’ve aimed better I guess
And he shot my right cheek on Abrams, that’s why I didn’t immediately died, skill issue on his part yet he survived. Abrams on the other hand got disabled on first hit, like it does most of the time.
1 Like
GRB MiG-29 (9-12A/B, 9-13) 12.0>11.7 If looking and comparing their CAS capabilities with F-16A block 10 they are clearly lacking, but are at the same BR.
Probably post pen damage.
The 99a and wz1001e shouldn’t be 12.0, they take 7.1 seconds to reload, and their disadvantages are magnified as other tanks get faster and faster, as well as inefficient armor and depression angles. 99a and wz1001 should go to 11.3, while vt4a1 is a fully degraded version of them, and vt4 is only worth
49 Likes
RB.The Ki 94-2 combat rating is 6.0>5.0, as it was not competing with other 6.0 and lower combat rating aircraft, and the change of ribbon to the Ho-155 made it even worse.
AND in ground RB, they are mostly used in lineups, so forcing thier lineups up, also forces those aircraft up in BR. So it effektively is a heavy CAS nerf unless the AA is also pulled up in BR.
Its following ALL orther mbt/ligth tanks in its br jump, it will effektively not change compared to how it is right now, I do agree that it really suffers from having low ammo count, but it is also a high skill gap tank, it can overpreform hard in skilled players hands if it didnt have weaknesses(ammocount and lowish-pen being two of them).
The T-90M is only a good tank against below average or bad players. It’s pretty easy to take out for any above average players.
And yes, the Abrams are far more capable in somewhat experieced player’s hands than the T-90M can ever dream to be.
It’s firepower is meh, it’s mobility is meh, it’s armor is decent and it’s survivability depends on enemy aim.
Actually, yes.
2 Likes