While I don’t think it needed to go down. You do have my interest. What 1940s aircraft is at 9.0?
Also I don’t think the M163 should have gone down either. Only reason I think they would do this is cause the M42 isn’t holding up in the 5.0 through 7.3 range but if that was an issue add a VADS without the radar. it wouldn’t be that hard.
Air RB, F4F ICE 13.3>13.0. The only reason why the F4F ICE is 13.3 are it’s AIM 120s, but the players already know how to defeat them quite easily, which renders the ICE sorta useless after it has fired it’s AIM 120s because it’ a 60s Airfare that has to fight 80s&90s Jets.
So a decrease in BR wouldn’t hurt it.
Pls consider Gaijin.
Naval RB, Asagao (YTE-01). 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability
Maybe he confused to Me 163B-0/Ki-200 which is 8.7 rn.
I’m fragging them with spikes but that is just Germany I don’t really see to many issues killing an HSTV-L except if you get the armor troll.
They have are buffing SPIKE penetration to 800-900mm. I guess its easier to model the top attack profile of the missile.
The F-4F KWS is in a weird spot like the Tornado it’s party trick is Radar and missiles.
Lowering it to 13.0 puts it in the same BR bracket as AV8B+ and Other none supersonic AMRAAM carriers.
I would say that the M1A2, SEP and Type 10s are easily better than the T-90M and comparable to or even slightly better than the BVM.
The T-90M is just too slow and pretty much immobile in reverse to be considered top 10. The Abrams and Type 10s also have serious weaknesses, but you can play around them without having to sit in the back all game due to their other strengths.
The T-90M has a lower skill floor, meaning that it’s easier for a bad/new player to hop in to and do well, but the Abrams (and type 10) have a much much much higher skill ceiling.
I dont like this new “one vehicle per post” change. It bogs down everything and makes it harder to suggest changes especially for things like vehicles that all are similar that need changes, or you disagree with a large group of changes.
For example if I disagreed with the whole list of F16s being changed, Id only be able to post one request for a change despite it basically being multiple copies of the same aircraft just for different nations.
Now that has been said, here is my one suggestion:
Air Realistic, A6M5 Ko: 5.3 → 4.7.
Reason: the late A6Ms have been raised up unfairly to rediculous levels the last few years and seriously cannot compete anymore. All of the A6M5s realistically need to drop by at least 0.3, but since Im only allowed one suggestion I picked my favourite one.
To be honest the Leopards and STRVs are so op right now they could go to 14.0!
IRCM is borderline useless in most matches there is hardly any any ATGM around that br which is effected by it so I wouldn’t even count that for anything. The APS on the KF is still bugged most of the time it doesn’t even stop incoming projectiles/ATGMs and you still gonna get killed so that’s out of the picture too. KF has overall worse armor, worse gun elevation which makes it less effective against helicopters/aircrafts, shooting the turret is a insta kill compered to the Puma’s crewless turret, has a bigger size than a Puma, but sure in the big picture it’s the same. Stop compering vehicles by statistics and start playing them.
Why not petition to push the AIM-9L and R-60M carriers to higher BR?
Your opinion is just bad because it makes the already pretty bad 8.0-10.0 compression even worse.
Air realistic, J29F. 9.0>8.7. The J29F slower top speed and worse flight performance than most planes at the same BR. It also accelerates slower. Compared to some Hunters and G.91s. This makes grinding sweden a total pain until the top tier
the T-90M is basically the ZTZ-99III with good gun handling, and that thing is just 10.7.
It is a lot better protected and has spall liners though. I think 11.7 (soon to be 12.0) is justified for it, but it is hardly top 10
They are creating Wyvern 2.0 lmao
I suppose so, though I one tap all of them if I can get a side shot regardless, their effectiveness aren’t nearly as insane as they were on first release.
We definitely need more j-35s like the j-35j in the tree. I do believe that Sweden will get a f-16 soon though (I hope)
AMX A-1A (Brazilian) shouldn’t be at 11.3, or should be 10.7 or 11.0 at max
SU-25T/SU-39 at 11.7 while A10C at 11.3? How does that make sense? SU-25BM is at 11.3 and SU-25SM3 is at 12.3 in AIR BATTLES while the only difference is the ground ordinance, all of them should be 11.3 altogether.
This is a br decompression, why some vehicles like M1A1 AIM and L2PL receive new APFSDS?
Merkava and Ariete need buff, it’s ok. But M1A1 AIM and L2PL clearly don’t need top Apfsds.