IRCM is borderline useless in most matches there is hardly any any ATGM around that br which is effected by it so I wouldn’t even count that for anything. The APS on the KF is still bugged most of the time it doesn’t even stop incoming projectiles/ATGMs and you still gonna get killed so that’s out of the picture too. KF has overall worse armor, worse gun elevation which makes it less effective against helicopters/aircrafts, shooting the turret is a insta kill compered to the Puma’s crewless turret, has a bigger size than a Puma, but sure in the big picture it’s the same. Stop compering vehicles by statistics and start playing them.
1 Like
Why not petition to push the AIM-9L and R-60M carriers to higher BR?
Your opinion is just bad because it makes the already pretty bad 8.0-10.0 compression even worse.
2 Likes
Air realistic, J29F. 9.0>8.7. The J29F slower top speed and worse flight performance than most planes at the same BR. It also accelerates slower. Compared to some Hunters and G.91s. This makes grinding sweden a total pain until the top tier
1 Like
the T-90M is basically the ZTZ-99III with good gun handling, and that thing is just 10.7.
It is a lot better protected and has spall liners though. I think 11.7 (soon to be 12.0) is justified for it, but it is hardly top 10
They are creating Wyvern 2.0 lmao
I suppose so, though I one tap all of them if I can get a side shot regardless, their effectiveness aren’t nearly as insane as they were on first release.
We definitely need more j-35s like the j-35j in the tree. I do believe that Sweden will get a f-16 soon though (I hope)
1 Like
AMX A-1A (Brazilian) shouldn’t be at 11.3, or should be 10.7 or 11.0 at max
SU-25T/SU-39 at 11.7 while A10C at 11.3? How does that make sense? SU-25BM is at 11.3 and SU-25SM3 is at 12.3 in AIR BATTLES while the only difference is the ground ordinance, all of them should be 11.3 altogether.
5 Likes
This is a br decompression, why some vehicles like M1A1 AIM and L2PL receive new APFSDS?
Merkava and Ariete need buff, it’s ok. But M1A1 AIM and L2PL clearly don’t need top Apfsds.
GRB, Su-25T. 11.3 > 11.0. Either lower it BR in comparison to it’s peers or give it Kh-29TE like all of it’s peers have, namely Su-39
Naval RB, MS-473 (3.0 → 2.7), wooden Italian boat with 2 40 mm Bofors L60 cannons, the platform is too outdated for 3.0 BR, poor survivability, very limited angles of turrets, below average speed, bad stability.
ARB, Su-25T/Su-39. 11.7 > 11.3 . Why should they be higher BR than Su-25BM if they are basically the same or even worse in terms of ARB?
No at all, only bad thing about T-90M is the horrific reverse speed, other than that it’s one of the most armored tanks in the game with both Relikt ERA’s and Spall Liners. It still has decent mobility and good turret traverse. I’d place 0.3 higher just because of Spall Liners alone, it basically gives you an extra life even though the enemy did place his shot correctly, it’s completely unfair advantage.
ARB. Su-25SM3. 12.3>11.3. I mean are you nuts? In terms of ARB it’s like giving Su-25T MAW and moving it to 12.3. It doesn’t make any sense.
hell no, just make the a10 12.3, no plane with IRCCM missile should be any lower than 12.0
1 Like
you are delusional my friend, spall liner on T-90M not doing a thing cuz of small inner space, it’s not like on Leopards where it gives a clear advantage over not having one…
RB.Is it possible to lower the combat rating of the G 55S 5.0>4.7 due to its characteristics (extremely low speed in the horizon, overheating and lack of flaps), as well as the deterioration of the MG 151 belts (self-destructor distance 1200 m).
1 Like
there is a clear difference between R-73 and Aim-9M, which you should know if you played any ARB and there is no sense keeping a plane with 2 R-73 and MAW on 12.3
RB.Change the combat rating of the Fw 190 A5 4.7>4.3 which now has a strong overheating taking into account the extremely bad climb as well as the detrioration of the MG 151 (self-destructor distance 1200 m) or remove overheating.
2 Likes