Why is the F8F-1 going down to 4.7?
We do not understand how that is a lower rating than the A6M5.
ZTZ99A/WZ1001(E)/VT4A1 11.7->11.3
The reason is:the slowest loading time in the top room is 7.1, the depth of penetration is 577, the protection is leaky, a gun is dead plus GAIJIN gave 99a main armour to cut a knife which makes the protection even more leaky. 99a mobility is okay, but can’t pull the gap, and even in the cross-country terrain still can’t run but the tanks such as t80bvm. As for the vt4, I don’t want to say anything more, protection, firepower, manoeuvrability, and the pitch angle of one of the things it doesn’t deserve!
The Peten should stay at it’s current BR. It’s inferior to the Seraph at the same BR. And there is no need for two helicopters to bei at the same BR
Peten 11.7>11.3
I do agree with the Strvs and 2a7 being slightly higher than bvm 90m. Also keeping Merkavas, Arietes, M1a2s slightly lower than the Strvs and 2a7s. Of course that is if we don’t see armor increase for those tanks. How about this Strvs and 2a7 12.3, M1a2s, T-series, Leclercs etc. 12.0?
F8F should NOT go down to 4.7, if anything it should move up to 5.3. 30m/s climbrate and 660kph on the deck WITH GUNPODS does not belong anywhere near 4.7.
Yeah most apds wont damage it, l15a3 goes clean through the t55M .
Like i said at the end of the reply, the chieftain needs its historical lrf and ammo, and itll be better than them in terms of firepower.
The t55m does look sweet to use though im not far off it.
Just me that would rather see more chieftain era stuff? Like t60 modifications, t95 series of protoypes etc.
This nonsense of every update is getting newer and newer equipment while we still are missing a shed load of stuff.
Like the scimitar, scorpion, saladins etc crv series of stuff.
I personally think the 5C should of stayed 11.0 and the E go to 11.3, now were systematically heading back to compression.
The 90m and bvm should be the same br theyre more than capable enough at that br.
The merkavas, challanger 2s etc are all seriously not worthy of 12.0.
Vautours should be 8.7 and Rank 5.
Without airspawn and inferior speed to almost anything around the BR, the Vautour are a mere decoration for your hangar. It struggles even to outmaneuver Aim-9Bs at times and cant get to bases quickly enough, as it starts on the airfield.
Arcade, Rooikat 105. Keep it at 9.3 in Arcade. There is no reason this should go up to 9.7 and the Rooikat MTTD with its new DM 33 Round beeing at 9.3. Rooikat 105 would not be overpowered staying at 9.3 and keep a good lineup it fits in. Also Light Vehicles are comparatively weaker in Arcade than Realistic.
I noticed now, The turms Will be 10.3 while the Ariete (P) 10.7. Go home gaijin, you are drunk
Maybe read the rules before you post.
Also no need to put these tanks to 11.3, stop compressing the already terribly compressed toptier.
Realistic, Vautours 9.0> 8.7 and Rank 5.
Without airspawn and inferior speed to almost anything around the BR, the Vautour are a mere decoration for your hangar. It struggles even to outmaneuver Aim-9Bs at times and cant get to bases quickly enough, as it starts on the airfield
How about you give some consideration to whether a vehicle even has any companions at a certain BR before you use stats to determine BR.So many useless tanks on their own at a certain BR ,5BR is a wasteland for land units.
Maybe if you stopped moving old vehicles around in the first place we might be able to put a line up together for a while.
Are you then suggesting the following br. change Strvs and 2a7s br. 12,3, 90M +BVM 12.0 and the rest M1A2s, Merkavas, Lec., Chally etc. 11,7?
4 Challenger 2 not increase BR or stay 11.3
Challenger 2E and Leclerc S21 still 11.7
I might agree Leclerc 3 variants increase battle rating but hope gaijin add new APFSDS OFL 120 F2 this quarter
I think battle rating 12.0 of ground vehicle top tier not enough. increase to 12.3
CHINA TANK:Bro,i am 7.1s,haha
Naval RB, LCS(L)(3). 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability
Naval RB, Alano L-9851. 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability
While I don’t think it needed to go down. You do have my interest. What 1940s aircraft is at 9.0?
Also I don’t think the M163 should have gone down either. Only reason I think they would do this is cause the M42 isn’t holding up in the 5.0 through 7.3 range but if that was an issue add a VADS without the radar. it wouldn’t be that hard.