Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Arcade, Rooikat 105. Keep it at 9.3 in Arcade. There is no reason this should go up to 9.7 and the Rooikat MTTD with its new DM 33 Round beeing at 9.3. Rooikat 105 would not be overpowered staying at 9.3 and keep a good lineup it fits in. Also Light Vehicles are comparatively weaker in Arcade than Realistic.

I noticed now, The turms Will be 10.3 while the Ariete (P) 10.7. Go home gaijin, you are drunk

Maybe read the rules before you post.

Also no need to put these tanks to 11.3, stop compressing the already terribly compressed toptier.

Realistic, Vautours 9.0> 8.7 and Rank 5.
Without airspawn and inferior speed to almost anything around the BR, the Vautour are a mere decoration for your hangar. It struggles even to outmaneuver Aim-9Bs at times and cant get to bases quickly enough, as it starts on the airfield

4 Likes

How about you give some consideration to whether a vehicle even has any companions at a certain BR before you use stats to determine BR.So many useless tanks on their own at a certain BR ,5BR is a wasteland for land units.
Maybe if you stopped moving old vehicles around in the first place we might be able to put a line up together for a while.

2 Likes

Are you then suggesting the following br. change Strvs and 2a7s br. 12,3, 90M +BVM 12.0 and the rest M1A2s, Merkavas, Lec., Chally etc. 11,7?

Screenshot 2024-10-03 143954

Screenshot 2024-10-03 144013

Screenshot 2024-10-03 144121

Screenshot 2024-10-03 144137

4 Challenger 2 not increase BR or stay 11.3

Screenshot 2024-10-03 144542

Screenshot 2024-10-03 144716

Challenger 2E and Leclerc S21 still 11.7

Screenshot 2024-10-03 145952

Screenshot 2024-10-03 150007

Screenshot 2024-10-03 150041

I might agree Leclerc 3 variants increase battle rating but hope gaijin add new APFSDS OFL 120 F2 this quarter

I think battle rating 12.0 of ground vehicle top tier not enough. increase to 12.3

8 Likes

CHINA TANK:Bro,i am 7.1s,haha

7 Likes

Naval RB, LCS(L)(3). 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability

2 Likes

Naval RB, Alano L-9851. 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability

2 Likes

While I don’t think it needed to go down. You do have my interest. What 1940s aircraft is at 9.0?

Also I don’t think the M163 should have gone down either. Only reason I think they would do this is cause the M42 isn’t holding up in the 5.0 through 7.3 range but if that was an issue add a VADS without the radar. it wouldn’t be that hard.

1 Like

Air RB, F4F ICE 13.3>13.0. The only reason why the F4F ICE is 13.3 are it’s AIM 120s, but the players already know how to defeat them quite easily, which renders the ICE sorta useless after it has fired it’s AIM 120s because it’ a 60s Airfare that has to fight 80s&90s Jets.
So a decrease in BR wouldn’t hurt it.
Pls consider Gaijin.

3 Likes

Naval RB, Asagao (YTE-01). 3.7 → 3.3. The Boat is well armed but can be killed by 2.3 Boats because of his terrible survivability

2 Likes

Maybe he confused to Me 163B-0/Ki-200 which is 8.7 rn.

I’m fragging them with spikes but that is just Germany I don’t really see to many issues killing an HSTV-L except if you get the armor troll.

They have are buffing SPIKE penetration to 800-900mm. I guess its easier to model the top attack profile of the missile.

The F-4F KWS is in a weird spot like the Tornado it’s party trick is Radar and missiles.
Lowering it to 13.0 puts it in the same BR bracket as AV8B+ and Other none supersonic AMRAAM carriers.

1 Like

I would say that the M1A2, SEP and Type 10s are easily better than the T-90M and comparable to or even slightly better than the BVM.

The T-90M is just too slow and pretty much immobile in reverse to be considered top 10. The Abrams and Type 10s also have serious weaknesses, but you can play around them without having to sit in the back all game due to their other strengths.

The T-90M has a lower skill floor, meaning that it’s easier for a bad/new player to hop in to and do well, but the Abrams (and type 10) have a much much much higher skill ceiling.

1 Like

I dont like this new “one vehicle per post” change. It bogs down everything and makes it harder to suggest changes especially for things like vehicles that all are similar that need changes, or you disagree with a large group of changes.

For example if I disagreed with the whole list of F16s being changed, Id only be able to post one request for a change despite it basically being multiple copies of the same aircraft just for different nations.

Now that has been said, here is my one suggestion:

Air Realistic, A6M5 Ko: 5.3 → 4.7.

Reason: the late A6Ms have been raised up unfairly to rediculous levels the last few years and seriously cannot compete anymore. All of the A6M5s realistically need to drop by at least 0.3, but since Im only allowed one suggestion I picked my favourite one.

6 Likes

To be honest the Leopards and STRVs are so op right now they could go to 14.0!