AB/RB, PLZ83-130, 7.3>6.7: please don’t forget about this poor event vehicle from earlier this year. Yes it has a great gun, but it suffers from the Sturer Emil syndrome. Great gun but mostly terrible chassis that is not up to it’s current BR. A rebalance would be fair I think.
Just 12.0 for ground? Seriously?
Simulator, AV-8B (NA). 11.3 > 12.0.
Reasoning: Its ground striking capabilities are unmatched in its current bracket, mostly due to the access to GPS bombs. Often enough a pair of these planes just go around the map stealing every single ground strike objective from their team.
LOL, yea I can see you don’t play the 8.0 bracket
forgetting it has 9Ms HMS and a better flight model and also has radar missiles, while being worse are sttill good enough
Move all 2a7s (including swedish 122+ and plss) and t80 bvm to12.3
Proposed… RN Bartolomeo Colleoni, Krasny Kavkas, HMS Enterprise 5.0>4.7…
Please, No!
US 5inch DDs and low tier Cruisers are already close to dominating small maps such as Golden Gate and pushing more in will make things even worse. These maps should be low BR only (<4.3) and not compressed even more. Push others upwards instead.
Ariete PSO 11.3 → 11.7
It’s a heavier version of Ariete which is worse in mobility. Remain it at 11.3
We need battle rating adjustments in air sim! You always ignore this mode but planes like a10c should not be same br as planes like the j35xs!
all: xm800T. 8.0 (propsed) > 9.0, it is ruining the game so it should be put somewhere it doesn’t outperform everything existing. I’m tired of having swarm of them destroying everything and being complete nuisance, especially since they are used to rush spawns massively.
Simulator, AV-8B Plus. 13.0 > 13.3
Reasoning: AIM120 should not be facing 12.0-12.7 planes. It might not be the fastest plane, but it’s neigh untouchable with the assortment of FOX3 missiles.
Further BR decompression would help, but until then, this plane has to go to 13.3.
T-80BVM is fine at 12.0, it is worse than 2A7V in essentially every way besides a bit of forward mobility.
The magical trash bags on the side stop m829a2, you dont see the seps ERA doing that.
How? It’s worse in every way possible
Simulator, F-4E Phantom II. 11.0 > 11.3.
Reasoning: It has alot of FOX1 and FOX2 missiles as well as huge ground pounding load. Comparing it to the German F-4F which lacks radar missiles and half the available CAS ordnance, it would be very unfair for these 2 planes remain at the same BR.
Then shoot under them lol, you’ll hit the ammo directly.
av-8b na (GRB) 11.3 → 12.0 Blatant cash grab and pay to win.
gr7 had 11.7 with 65d and 9l. 12.0 because all other top harriers have this br only for their anti-ground capabilities (4x65G + pod combo) and their anti-air weapons don’t affect it.
Realistic battles PUMA VJTF 11.0 > 10.7.
That thing is not competitive against 12.0 and 11.7 MBT’s. SPIKEs are still a joke despite recent buffs and its slow-firing 30mm doesn’t make up for it. Also it’s composite armor is still modeled wrong.
That’s right, whatever they are doing to the Fox’s APDS should effect the Warrior too.
Otherwise they made the right call to keep the Fox at 7.7, its perfect.
Also
GRB, Falcon 8.3 > 7.7. There are three British SPAAs at 8.3 and the Falcon is the only one without Radar. At 7.7 we have the ZSU-37-2 and the VEAK that both have Radar. There isn’t much of a line up for it at 8.0 but the 7.7 British line up is robust except it lacks an SPAA. Moving the Falcon down would fill that niche and help alleviate the drought of British SPAAs between 5.3 and 8.3
AMX-50 (TO90/930) → HEAT-FS (M431 shell)
historically the Bat 25T and the AMX 50/90 can load all the ammunition of the Patton M47, this would transform them into a Swiss Army knife, a fast tank that can handle a lot of tanks in its BR without excelling and without stabilizer.