Increasing it to 8 would barely change anything, increasing it to 12 may.
Fairly certain its suppose to be like 20 or something, same as the CR1s
2 Likes
Air RB, Kfir canards should be 11.0 (11.3.>11.0)
Reasoning: This plane is inferior in flight performance to the mig 21bis and also has inferior weapons, it only has 2x aim9G or shafir 2
4 Likes
@Stona_WT please, I’m aware you’ve been asked before, but can you please clarify what the new outputs are for the RARDEN, and confirm that they will be mirrored to the Warrior?
The CR1s also only had like 5? The chieftains do have a whopping 24+1.
2 Likes
F-14s going up is really good, but according to Modern ARH (FOX 3) Missile - History, Performance & Discussion the AIM-54 should have a Max G Pull of Up to 25Gs, this mean that the AIM-54 needs a buff of AOA and G pull, also the Fakour-90 is overperforming by a Lot since it should have way less range than the AIM-54, while AIM-54 should have way more range, AIM-54 should loft more than it does right now, up to 100.000ft, beyond the maps límit… and a loft angle of 30°.
-Less drag.
-a bit more power.
Top speed of Mach 5.
Max kill range of 160km, since ita actually accurate.
While You can’t get higher kills than 65km, do You have the same efective range of the R-27ER.
3 Likes
1 Like
Air Simulator, Su-25SM3, 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: it’s most similar to the A-10C in pretty much every way, thus they should be the same Br.
-additionally add 2x R60Ms on the outer most hard points, as they are empty and all the Su-25SM3 gets to defend itself is 2x R-73s, which is a bit lacking and rather odd.
Or, to make it completely balanced, give the Su-25SM3 4x R73s to match the A-10C
That way there is balance and they are pretty much 1:1
The A-10C will have more Cms, while the SU-25Sm3 will have less Cms, and less cockpit visibility for the trade off of speed.
I agree. While I disagree with the flight performance bit, but it is undeniable that the kfir canard(and C.2/C.7) are overtiered. I believe it is the lack of adequate countermeasures combined with the poor avionics that limits their potential.
Yeah but its meant to shoot down soviet bombers, giving them such a range wouldnt change much. Are you trying to down the SOLG again?
1 Like
Yeah 💀
Good. If the falcon isn’t a pure tank destroyer it should go to 7.7,
But the fox still needs to become 8.0
unless they give the taiwanese version the export version of M774 which is FP105 (C76A1)
1 Like
Unless the changes massively nerf the 30mm APDS on the RARDEN, in which case should go down to 7.3 maybe eve 7.0 again as its performance is not good enough outside of the pen
4 Likes
Air RB, F104S ASA, should be 11.7 maybe 11.3 (12.0>11.7 or 11.3)
Reasoning: the recent modifications to your FM, your flight performance, you having to give up the cannon to take aspide-1A, are not justifications for this plane to be 12.0, it does everything a mig23ml does but worse.
2 Likes
Ground Realistic Battle, 2S38 10.3>11.0. The 2S38 has almost as much penetration as the HSTV-L. The 2S38 has APFSDS, radar, APHE and Proxy Fuse. The 2S38 would feel and be more balanced at 11.0 because it can still face the same tanks as it did before but also face toptier vehicles.
7 Likes
Just get them down to 8.7. China 9.0 and 9.3 will benefit a lot(along with Britain, Italy and Israel who got good 9.3), and 9.3 is enough with ZTZ96 and CM11 for like most conditions.
1 Like
Agree. The ASA needs adequate attention, and Id say its 11.3 at best.
1 Like
The only problem is the hstvl is insanely survivable vs the 2s38
Smaller and faster too
Air RB, mig21bis (all models), 11.3=11.3
Reasoning: This plane is already in a good spot, the biggest problem with this plane was the up tier against f14, this has a good flight performance and 6x r60mk, too powerful to reduce its br to 11.0
Now the J7D and E which are essentially mig21bis, but with 2 less missiles I don’t know if they should continue on 11.0 or not, it wouldn’t kill the plane if it was 11.3
1 Like