BS. PL-7 is just fkin Magic, you can find this missile in plane as low as 10.0, that’s not the missile that allegedly makes this plane overpowered.
Air RB, La-11(China & USSR). 5.3 > 5.0. This plane is fat and heavy, with low velocity guns, poor climbrate, poor manouverability and is overall poor to fly.
Air RB, Ki-84 HEI. 6.3 > 5.7. The increase in armament for this version of the Ki-84 does not warrant the BR increase anymore, as the 30mm cannons are not as reliable as they were, and the armament on the earlier Ki-84s is plenty to quickly and easily kill anything you will land hits on. Flight performance is otherwise roughly the same as the earlier versions.
Air RB, F8U-2. 10.0 > 10.3. The changes to wing ripping have made this plane effectively immune to that issue that previously greatly held it back, and it is now able to make full use of the manouverability of the airframe at speed, and this combined with the missiles it carries, its countermeasures and its engine have meant that it is beginning to take over matches it gets into, especially in downteirs.
Air & Ground Realistic
F4U-1A
2.7 → 3.0
6x .50 cal, good flight performance and able to carry a decent sized bomb should not be this low in BR.
Will the A-10C be receiving any nerfs or br increases? It’s currently doing far too well for Air Sim battles…
The 11.3 plane with the performance of an 12.7 plane in sim.
Honestly the A-10C should be moved up to 12.0, and the Su-25SM3 down to 12.0, it won’t be exactly fair, 1:1 but it will be FAR better for the poor 10.3 air sim planes even the 11.3 planes with only 12 countermeasures.
It’s honestly a travesty it’s gone on this long.
Lastly, many people agree with this change, in game, and in the forums.
И без всяких изменений MIG-21C(P-13-300)? Я понимаю - вроде средний рейтинг, но со своей скоростью и ПАРЛами это жуткое имбище, нарушающее всякий баланс. Здесь реально необходимы изменения - нет желания поднимать рейтиг, так снизте эффективность (((
ground RB,tiger II(H)(all version),6.7>7.0,tiger II(H)is the best heavy tank in its BR and caused serious pressure to those players who playing lower BR veichles,its has a few weak spot to the lower BR veichles,and got balanced between fire rate,armour piercing ability,he filler,and protection
Chinese top tier is not in a fair BR, 7.1s is already slowest, not decent pen and front armor. VT4A1 is not fair tradeoff by add the APS. Loss mobility +armor for the APS.
At that BR, it would be effectively pointless to play as it would just get slapped to death by Fox 3s. It’s slower than the Su-25 and has less ordinance options so bringing it in line with that makes no sense. It’s more than fine at its current BR. This “let’s gimp everything US” is getting old. “The game will only be enjoyable and fair if we ruin 2/3 of the US’s top tier aircraft” is a terrible argument.
ground RB,IS-1,5.7>5.3,Its armour is not effective towards the lower BR vehicles
Look at that entire thread. You cannot tell me they are equal purely due to speed. The Su-39 can see fox 3s as well…
But you don’t hear me complaining about that.
The a-10c: pingless iff, maw, 480 Cms, 4 aim 9ms, tons of main cannon ammo, great maneuverability…
Br:11.3
The Su-39: long range radar, speed. Br: 11.7
HOW IS THE A-10C LOWER THAN THE SU-39??? Or SU-25T while being 20x better than it??
Just because you don’t know how to fly is not my problem, a lot of people hate the F-4s but I love it, great aircraft, well balanced at 12.0 even.
Guy is baiting, just ignore
That’s not bait, but okay teddy.
Just because you can’t dodge 9Ms is not its fault. It’s a slow moving brick. It’s more than fine at its current BR.
Okay, so then bring all those other nations strike fighters down below 11.3
look at the rest of his posts, if he isnt baiting, he isnt worth talking to
Wow. I bring up a fact as you start saying things like that. Man, what happened you you Ted, you went from decent fellow to straight up accepting bias.
It’s even worse, he wants tomcat to stay in their current BR. what a load of living shite.
What bias am i accepting?