Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

The biggest problem is that Gaijin is pushing 9.3/9.0 vehicles and old top tier jets down to lower BRs just like MiG-15bis.

While of course that should not happen, looking at the BR changes over the past few years at 8.0-10.0s from 2020, Gaijin has idea of moving bad vehicles to lower BRs.

1 Like

I think the Mig-21F-13 should be at 9.0 in the same way as the F3H-2 because it has 2 worse aim9b and a single cannon with 60 bullets but it is supersonic but on the other side F3H-2 has much more ammunition for its 4 guns and it also has radar and can carry 4 aim9b/aim7c or 2 aim9b and 2 aim7c but it is subsonic

2 Likes

AirRB, F-14B. 13.0 > 12.7. - Majority of the planes 13.0+ can outrun, and out turn the AIM54C. From personal in game experience the hit rate with the AIM54C drops way too much in uptier lobbies vs other ARH missiles. 12.7 was a sweet spot where it seemed pretty balanced.

Have you played the ST? You come off a a single nation main with no experience (no offense) those tanks are bad, like horrible. They dont have good armor or mobility and are literal glass cannons. If you want historical stuff play Sim.

Why do you think the Italian CL-13 is a problem? I don’t think it’s particularly good. It seems to be worse-off than the F-86F-25

Ground RB. VK 45.01 (P). 5.3 > 5.0. You cant use angle tactic becuase the 80mm weak spots in the frontal armor and the turret speed is much much worse and even is lower in foward speed giving worse movility than the tech tree variant.
The only good is his reverse but thats all.
This tank should be lowered to 5.0 with all his drawbacks and very low number, in 5.0 is far for be a problem for the gameplay.

2 Likes

Just ignore the fact the Mig-21F-13 has double the F3H-2s speed and would be totally broken at 9.0. It, along with the F-104 and Lightning F6 probably need to go UP to 9.7

(bare in mind we have 9.0s like the Hunter F1 which are slower than the F3H-2 and have no AAMs at all)

1 Like

Air RB, F-111A, 10.7-> 10.3 With bad flight model and aim-9B only it would still be alright at lower BR

All of the current Russia 10.0 tanks should go 0.7 in br and not 0.3. Bmp 2m staying at 10.3 is hilarious.

If you couldn’t just use IS2 reverse strats and basically only be killable except through the cupola id agree. Unfortunately you can do that so no.

GRB, AMX-10P, 6.3 > 5.3

6.3 for an ‘IFV’-type AA? Really? Japan get’s the SUB-I-IIat 5.3, which is basically the same thing. DM63, Same cannon, but SUB-I-II also gets a better max gun elevation/depression, aswell as overall better mobility.

7 Likes

It is just overtiered.
Italian CL-13 is just A-5 Sabre without wingslats so, it is worst Sabre entire the game.
However, It has same BR with F-25 Sabre and MiG-15bis for somehow.

J35XS 11.3 > 10.7 (Without RWR and radar missile)

4 Likes

It has an electric engine. Use its engine as armour, instead of the front plate. It becomes a slightly less effective Tiger 1H at a lower BR.

It’s good that you took down the Draken XS but It’s not enough. You have to give to it better missiles or take this down to 10.7/10.3. It’s a premium vehicle that has no RWR 12 flares and 1 gun With 120bullets. This makes no sense

Plane - A-1H
Mode - GRB
Br - 6.3 → 7.0
Its ordanance level at its current BR is absurd, 40 Zunis can basicly wipe an entire team by it self, its quite rare but when I do see it, it will get 10-15 kills

Ground RB, JPN UH-1B, ITA AB205 7.7>7.3
Both of them lack a lineup, both of them are still easily controlled by anything that can aim above horizon, just FFARs without CCIP and have no chance against 8.0+ spaas in lineup where they have a chance to exist. Interesting and fun machines with no possibility to shine in current BR.

2 Likes

AMX has better crew protection and they cant be 7.62 killed, ive played both and yes the AMX is better for long matches. Though yes it is definitely too high of a BR

2 Likes

GRB, Ozelot 9.7>9.3. Armament consists of IR missiles only. Compared to Other Nations SPAA at this BR the Ozelot is less capable and versitile.

I see. I thought you meant that it was good 😂