Planned Battle Rating changes for January 2024

Typically yes. US mains play US as their first country, lowering the winrates since they’re new. They play other countries after, and drive up the winrates of other countries’ planes as experienced players.

2 Likes

What in any world makes the Bat Chat anything comparable to the Object 906? Bet you forgot about it so I’ll remind you, 4.1 second reload, IS-2 like APHE (better than Bat chat), HEATFS, large amounts of open space with little armour to generate spalling, more mobile and lower silhouette and most importantly a stabilizer. Now lets see the Bat Chat, up you come! Hmm weird, the only advantage I can find is the 7.5mm roof mounted MG and 0.1 second faster reload. It is almost as if either the Object 906 needs to be raised to around 8.7 or keep the Bat Chat at 7.7 and preferably move it down to 7.3 again, because that 90mm is not doing ANYTHING unless you are slap bang 90* flanking shot.

5 Likes

593 battles in CV90105 with a KD of almost 3 (tho I VERY often hit games with 6-9 kills), this thing can definitely go up to 10.3, if the top ground br was raised to like 12.0 then it could go up to 10.7. It serves as a great addition to CV90120.

LMAO
Type 81 (C) goes to br 11.0 without rarder,
Glad I already finished grind all Type 81 (C) parts.

I press F for anyone who still haven’t grind Type 81 (C) yet,
When enemy’s aircraft above 7000 m sky,
I’m hope you will enjoy use your own eyes to find some tiny pixel on your screen,
Not to mention you might have rainny or foggy weather in the game…double fun !

2 Likes

u joke, my first is Germany.
there are 3 F15 in the game, if one of them good by gajjin data, then they alll go up in the first move…

1 Like

OK but M9000 is not the only threat in 9.7,DCT-10(ZTZ-99II/III) and 3BM60(T-90A) can also reach 500+ Penetration.

1 Like

i think they meant AGS firing M900 given its broken nature as a platform. ZTZs and T-90 are relatively horrible platforms tbh

Sadly AGS never equip with M900 rounds,US Army get them during 1990s early for IPM1 and M1128

US pilots have a long history of being dramatically worse at flying than other nations’ pilots.

3 Likes

The US had a sort of reward system where if you were good and had gotten a good amount of kills and already spent a while there they would send you back home. Incentive for being good pilot lol. However Germans kept their best pilots because they didn’t have that many by the time the best German aces had truly impressive counts

I disagree with these Japan nerfs you over br every little thing with Japan gaijian it’s absolutely bonkers I’m going to lose my mind with your obnoxious hatred for Japan if you’re going to move the j2ms up move the fws up if you move the the type 99 up move the type 75 mlrs down it has no line up it’s useless at 7.0 if you move the type 81c up buff it to have radar missiles to counter helis it quite literally cannot deal with helis at that br

3 Likes

Yeah, the Brits had shot most of them down by the time the US entered the war

(and thats in game stats not IRL Stats he linked)

Yep. Most people tend to forget that the American fighters were more focused on bomber escort and CAS for stuff like p47 than directly hunting down enemy fighters. Only exception might be some early Pacific front air battles but other than that just escort. P-51 had insane range especially with its drop tank for aforementioned reasons while spitfires were built to down 109s and other fighters

1 Like

Most people ignore the Pacific and the success US fighters had over the Japanese.

I’m not talking about the historical IRL pilots.

1 Like

But US pilots aren’t that bad except at low tier and low level premium players which the us air tt is filled with

can gaijin atleast confirm if the AGS will be getting it’s autoloader replenisher? it’s the only MAIN DRAWBACK about that thing. once your 9 rounds is gone you have to wait for 30 seconds for a new round. like wtf. also the Spall Liners. afterall the crew sits inside a basket surrounded by it

Our top ace of the war was a P-38 pilot who served entirely in the Pacific. The only thing to take precedence in the headlines over his death by plane crash while testing America’s first jet was the atomic bombing of Japan.

As to air balance in WT, the vast majority of combat takes place in situations extremely unfavorable to US planes of short range, low-altitude knife fights. Here’s what Eric Brown of the RAF said about the Mustang vs. the Spitfire:

The Mustang was a good fighter and the best escort due to its incredible range, make no mistake about it. It was also the best American dogfighter. But the laminar-flow wing fitted to the Mustang could be a little tricky. It could not by any means out-turn a Spitfire. No way. It had a good rate-of-roll, better than the Spitfire, so I would say the plusses to the Spitfire and the Mustang just about equate. If I were in a dogfight, I’d prefer to be flying the Spitfire. The problem was I wouldn’t like to be in a dogfight near Berlin, because I could never get home to Britain in a Spitfire!

If you look at the compressor altitudes on US planes vs. other nations, most planes start choking hard on the thinner air at altitudes where the American ones are just starting to spool up.

4xR-73 for Yak-41M, there will be no “early” and “late” variants of the plane, just add the 4xR-73 for it, there is no reason it should not have it i dunno what about the BR but come on

1 Like

I honestly don’t know why the Yak-141 can’t carry four R-27ER’s. The outer pylons could certainly take the weight of the heavier 4x Kh-35 loadout.