Pz.W. 42 2.3 → 1.7 especially in an uptier there are enemy you cant even (or very hardly) destroy as the rockets only have 27mm penetrarion, on top of that the vehicle is just so painfully slow.
pr.56 going to 5.3? Are you sure gaijin? I don’t think 56 can compare with Atlanta or krasny krym.
I feel like the sagittario shouldnt be the same br as the ariete as its engine preformance is already really poor for its br while it can compensate for it with turn rate and guns it will be outran by every other aircraft in an uptier and in a lot of cases even in a downtier making it kinda useless
Pffff Strela move to 9.7 just up 0.4 br lol sure anything that make Russia main’s life easier meanwhile type 81 go to 11.0
LMAO… Are you joking?
Dear Gaijin devs, the VERY best idea about every BR changes (or every changes in general) would be to add the reason of proposed change (with sources if in vehicle change, as we have to in bug reports) - change my mind.
For example:
Vidar 8.0 → 9.0 RB, good mobility, good armor vs low calibres, very good HE round with 9kg tnt on top with great thermals and laser range finder makes this vehicle point&click, so we dicide to move it by 1.0 BR.
Btw. That’s my proposition btw. Vidar at 8.0 BR is a monster which is sealclubbing whole 7.0-9.0 BR, tbh even 9.0 is low for this vehicle, but that would be a good start.
Source = their own internal statistics
So let’s public them.
Gaijin says thunderskill is not reliable source so let why they don’t let us see their own statistics then.
Soo Are 2S6 gonna be 11.0 too like Type 81 because 2S6 Have radar and 32G missile ??
They don’t need to.
J6K1’s RB is too high. It does not have an excellent engine like the Spitfire MK22 and MK24. Moreover, consider the performance of the Spitfire at 7.0. It’s hard for the J6K1 to do better. Therefore, the J6K1 should rightly remain at 6.3.
I’m not satisfied with the changes. Moving France’s lineup from 7.3 to 7.7 was I think a very good decision, but moving it from 7.7 to 8.0 is not really a very wise idea in my opinion.
Also could you please consider moving KF41 Lynx from 10.7 to 10.3? It is just simply not strong enough compared to other vehicles in that BR.
So don’t use it as an argument. Also what’s the problem to public this?
It’s like using sources in bug report without uploading them aka “trust me bro” xd
Simply put, gaijin wants trustable data since they are the ones making changes. You are not making changes so you don’t need the privilege of internal statistics.
Wow, Leopard 2A7V/122s is still 11.7? Clearly they should go to 12.0
To offer my thoughts, the move to make air 12.7 is great! But now they should also make ground 12.0! Especially with new vehicles such as the 2A7 that are absolutely superior to ever other tank in game.
Some complaints:
T20 should stay at 6.0, the tank is a glass cannon, and it’s gun isn’t even that impressive at its own BR.
J-8F shouldn’t move up to 12.0, as it’s still outclassed by many 12.0 jets such as the F-16A and Mig-29, and offers no advantage, all while lacking BVR capabilities still.
Finally, 12.7 on air, can we now finally get su27 locking over 10km range possible.
And why in he**, a plane that can lock and has ok radar missiles is staying in 12.3 ?
Dear Gaijin,
as a Françias tank player,I am very very very confused about the new plan of moving these tanks’ br ,including SOUMA,AMX,Char and etc,from 7.7 up to 8.0,it is totally incomprehensible and unbearable for us Françias tank players.
Not to mention their relatively weak Armor and APC cannonball when they are confronted with tanks like t55,bmp2 or TAM directly,if so,the originally characteristic Autoloader in the same br is just like a JOKE and the absence of Stabilizer makes them even harder to fight back in encountering combats.In other words,new br means that there would be no difference between the originally most intersting and characteristic Françias tanks and Rubbish.Françias tanks’ environment is worse and worse.I suggest You had better Cancel,Cease,Delete all the Françias Tanks early so that there would not be no France tank players in the game one day.
Debatable. 4x is certainly exaggerated: Remember that the front nozzles are in front of the combustion chamber and thus deliver much colder air than the rear ones.
On the contrary one may even argue that the cold air flow from the front nozzles somewhat shield the hot exhaust from the hot rear nozzles a bit.
In the end we’d have to trust official info on this, everything else is speculation.
Who knows it’s not fake info or manipulated then?
I wonder what’s the reason of Char25t, somua SM, AMX 50 TO90 to be moved to 8.0… I rly want to see how “great” 200mm aphe penetration without stab or improved LRF is on 8.7 vs T-55AM-1 or T-62 etc.
Same story with T-20. What makes it 6.3? T-20 is similar to Sherman 76 from 5.7 xd