I’m curious who thought it was ok for the Hs 129B-3 to be allowed to shoot at reserve tanks by moving it to 2.0
Germany’s gun CAS is strong at pretty much all BRs, did it really need to also get the ability to bully completely new players?
1 Like
Are you serious about T20 going up to 6.3??
It is vastly inferior to T25 in everything except for having stabilizer.
3 Likes
This right here. It keeps getting said over and over.
It could be the flare count, but it could also just be because its really new, and these changes were written before it was ofifically added to the game, we’ll see if that changes or not.
Leave the AGS where it is, it will never belong in 11.0 as its just barely better than the M1128 so not even M833 will help it perform, it will just become another dead unplayable vehicle.
Furthermore for the love of god leave the 7.7 French tanks where they are, I hate the French as much as anyone but this is straight up bullying.
4 Likes
Im conflicted.
As a Brit, we are required to make sure France suffers.
but on the other hand, seeing minor nations get screwed doesnt sit right.
I hope they ease up a bit on france.
4 Likes
What about F4EJ? they should be go down to 10.7 and remove AIM7 that they cannot use.
What’s the reason for all these French tank nerfs? IMO they all need to be going down to either 7.3 or 7.0. Pushing them up to 8.0 is, frankly, insane. No one who plays any of those tanks would ever be crazy enough to even suggest putting them at 8.0.
7 Likes
Underwhelming and insulting BR changes for French players.
This nation is tough to play and unappealing – nerfing it even more is not a good idea.
7 Likes
I think it is absolutely the right direction. We should still see a little more decompression however. I want to see us at 13.5 area.
With the variants of the F-16, F-14, and F-15 we could easily fill 12.7-13.5. Russia, Sweden, Israel, and France can all make this happen easily. It also reduces the more uncomfortable matches we see at 11.3 range. Leaving the F-15 behind is definitely not a good thing. It should also be bumped. If it’s not moved to 12.7, because it lacked HMD then move it to 12.5 lol. It’s going to end up in a lot more downtiered matches than it should if it remains lower than the rest of the later generation jets. The two high tier premiums are battling out significantly more capable planes in the 12+ region. The F-4S definitely isn’t a great contender as a flying brick, the MiG-23 might be able to hold out a bit more with the right pilot.
A lot of references to the 9-10 range with all aspect missiles. This 100% needs to be fixed. The F-104 is one example of no fun whatsoever at this BR. No RWR, no countermeasures, and no real response to it’s peers in this BR. The MiG-21 and SU are impossibly ridiculous to fight here. I most often see the MiG-21 be the deciding factor for the match. Decompression of this BR range really needs to be considered.
I got a few complaints. Falcon, this is an SPAA and although it performs well as a tank destroyer, it’s a glass cannon and no where near as OP as the zsu-57-2 or the WZ305 at killing tanks. It is also no where near comparable to the Gepard as it doesn’t have radar or the DM23/DM13. There is literally no point in using this over the marksman or za35, and is much better sitting at 8.0 with the rest of GB’s lineup. F5E going to 11.0? Again? It has 2 meh missiles for the battle rating when compared to things such as the JA37C (which is still 11.0!!!) or the mig23, or the mig21 etc. This thing is not cut out for being the same br as those aircraft listed above and will underperform greatly at this BR(as it did before -.-). This also doesn’t make sense for ground as they have the superior F4E to use for cas at 11.0, so the AGM65B isn’t really all that good when all things are considered. I am real glad we’re getting BR decompression for air but come on gaijin, it’s time to do the same for ground. The leo 2a5 and 2a7v should not be the same BR in any world, as it doesn’t take a genius to distinguish the two and their performance. In my opinion I think we are completely ready for 12.3 ground, as there aren’t many more ground vehicles to be added and raising the BR cap will help decompress the 8.0-11.0 range, which has needed some decompression for a while now. And again if you didn’t hear me the first time, please don’t move the falcon up, it’s really not comparable to the likes of a gepard.
Move Strela-10M2 to BR 10.0
1 Like
Kindly leave the AGS, the Stryker sidegrade that gets more (worse) ammo and less mobility, where it is. It cannot fight in 11.0 mostly because it will be nothing but uptiers.
2 Likes
What about F4EJ? they should be go down to 10.7 and >remove AIM7 that they cannot use
https://www.mhi.com/products/defense/f_4ej_jet_fighter.html
Mitsubishi says that it can use the Sparrow. Not sure why you say they can’t use it.
1 Like
T-20 at 6.3 lol
Does anyone still remember the M26 and T-44 are still at 6.7
Brainless change.
1 Like
You should move all 7.0 battleships into their own MM versus eachother
There is such an insane powergap between 7.0 and 6.3/6.0 ships it is utterly unplayable
I don’t understand how they do these are some of the worst changes I’ve seen in awhile
1 Like
T25 literally has worse acceleration than the M26.
I much prefer using the T20 at 6.3 than the T25 due to the stabilizer, reload and significantly better mobility.
1 Like
That’s a change they added to it not a bug