F-15E would join it at 14.3 because the F-15E has both the superior radar and loadout. They are fairly equal. F-15C would then move to 14.0, if it doesnt join the F-15E at the same BR already
Supposedly the F-4J(UK) was actually used a good bit to prevent confusion with the incoming Tornado F.3, but that doesn’t really matter in the game.
1 Like
oh come on. mig21SMT is getting 10.3 but J7D staying up high? I jus bought that thing with 60dollar gaijin wtf
But how will you know which F3 im talking about :P
Its not like the Gr1, Gr1 and the Gr1 are 3 entirely different aircraft :P
Air RB
tornado_ids_de_assta1 11.7→11.3
tornado_ids_it_mod95 11.7→11.3
what is difference in air RB between assta1, mod95 and ids(11.3)
GRB, Su-34 12.7>13.0
Much like the Rafale, the Su-34 offers a vast jump in performance over it’s contemporaries, without the logical BR increase. Being able to carry 6x fire and forget missiles with a range of +/-20km means it stay at the edge of most SPAAs range, and can overwhelm them with missiles. While staying mostly out of danger. Forcing CAP play with the possibility for players with a true 11.7 loadout to have aircraft without even Fox 1s.
1 Like
It’s already undertiered, and it should go to 11.0 in my opinion.
10.3 would make it even more OP.
1 Like
Those laser guided bombs are just too OP in A2A combat
/s
1 Like
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: B-26C (France)
Change: 4.7 → 4.3
Reasoning: This seems to have been unintentionally overlooked. The American B-26B is at BR 4.3, and the B-26C should be lowered from 4.7 to 4.3, as both are identical.
6 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: B-29A-BN
Change: 7.0 → 6.7
Reasoning: The B-29A is very vulnerable against lethal jet fighters, as it cannot defend itself effectively with all its 0.50-caliber HMG turrets. Please consider lowering its BR slightly to allow it to face propeller aircraft more often.
4 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Tu-4 (All)
Change: 8.0 → 7.0
Reasoning: The Tu-4 struggles to survive in uptiers, especially when facing faster jets armed with air-to-air missiles. It’s now much easier to destroy the fragile Tu-4 with heavier cannons and radar-guided missiles. The Tu-4 is essentially functioning as a piñata. Please consider lowering its BR a little more to 7.0.
I’ve got a post for this too. I love how many of these slip through the cracks but its scary how long it takes them to take note
2 Likes
ARB- F-104G (China). 10.7>10.3 OR Stay at 10.7; receive ahistorical AN/ALE-40 Countermeasures system for balance reasons
The F-104G in the Chinese tree does not have countermeasures in its present configuration, yet sits at a higher BR than the F-104J in the Japanese tree which carries additional missiles, while trading away ground attack capability that is, realistically, not relevant in ARB battle ratings. Therefore, the BR should be reduced.
Alternately, it instead could stay at 10.7 and receive- admittedly- ahistorical countermeasures of the same type mounted to the German, Italian, and French examples for balancing purposes to prevent it from seeing 9.3 aircraft. This argument could be made for the Japanese F-104J as well (per rules, see separate post).
Furthermore, post flight model adjustment, the late model F-104s are much more limited in their performance. While the issue of the F-104 being able to pull excessive and incorrect angles of attack and excessive G-Forces has been fixed, it is clear that this was done by increasing drag on the airframe to incorrect levels. Therefore, the Starfighter is also hampered in its ability to retain energy, which it was historically quite good at doing. Being able to sustain a high-speed, high energy turn was a significant tool that the Starfighter could make use of, but right now, because of the flight model adjustments, it is very difficult to do. Turns of any kind produce a loss of speed and energy that seem excessive for the angle of attack and G-Forces being experienced.
The flight model should be revisited to ensure that its performance across all variants is a correct representation of its capabilities.
Thank you for your consideration.
4 Likes
or decrease the reload on the tam 2c… or all 105mm guns above 10.0 br… Cuz it is worse than 120mm guns at the same br… Does not make sense that 120mm guns reload faster than 105mm guns
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
It wants 9ms nothing more
1 Like
Absolutely not.
The J-7E is already ridiculously strong at 11.3. The only reason it’s ok to stay there is because so many other planes from 11.0-10.0 are already moving down.
2 Likes
Captor-M is (or at least should be, with many buffs already passed to the devs) superior to the APG-70 in every single way. And the base airframe offers superior performance in every other regard that matters in ARB. Only real downside is less countermeasures, but that can be played around.
There isn’t really any reason to move the 15E up without deconflicting the rest of top tier with a decompression. But that isn’t likely to happen for awhile. In a perfect world, 15A and it’s contemporaries becomes 13.7, 15C and contemporaries become 14.7, 15E becomes 15.0, EF/Rafale become 15.3, F-22 comes in at 16.0.
Then everything below can spread out a little more with the extra room to breath.
cant agree more
R2y2 to 7.7 its kibda bad for 8.0 as it does just feel like a 262
2 Likes