You are wrong. Compare angled pen. They are comparable to one another except the Vickers APDS actually has higher pen in most instances. (Because most things you shoot at are not 0 degree plates) I agree otherwise with your post.
1 Like
I think the MiG-29A, in all of it’s versions, should be moved from 12.7 to 12.3 in Air RB. The MiG-21 Bison features the same BR and still carries the R-73 and R-27, and the MiG-29A only carries R-27’s and R-60M’s, and no guided ordinances. Even if the BR change makes it OP you guys can still move it to his original BR and that’s it.
2 Likes
Then ask for decompression.
Yeah, it would be fine at its current BR as well if SRAAMs were usable. They are so nerfed at the moment they are barely usable
It would need to loose R-27ERs, those are still some of the strongest missiles in game
It could be 3.3 at best, any higher and its useless and is just strictly worse than the 75mm variants.
1 Like
12.3 and the removal of the R-27ERs would be fine with me.
Ignorant take, no reasoning that’s valid here… they just oppress flareless jets. They should not be getting many kills in air to air as a RULE otherwise you are putting them TOO LOW.
Why are you not just saying this? This is very reasonable. Lowering their BRs is not.
2 Likes
took the words right out of my mouth.
1 Like
Also, it wasn’t just one vehicle. Both A-10s, the A-6 TRAM, and the Su-25/K were all affected.
So now the F-14A once again is massively overpowered and stomps on all 11.3-11.7? What a great idea!
So no, we won’t be doing that (hopefully anyway), your solution is to, get this, DECOMPRESS.
God forbid a slow, straight winged CAS plane outturns a fighter optimized for high speed flight and lobbing missiles! God forbid it being able to defend itself! The Cope is real.
1 Like
i disagree. it absolutely should not go below 7.7 br and the most suitable seems to be 8.0br for me.
Now that it has access to a ammobox you have access to 60 + 660 apds which you can spam at very rapid bursts(apds refill is like .5 seconds) anywhere you like + “infinite” amount at a capture point.
sidam at a ammobox/capture point > zsu-23-4, but you need sit still to constantly refill the apds.
the stock belt should be changed tho(maybe 1 in 3 apds?), with the current stock belts you have poor velocity against aircraft and cannot kill any grounds targets with your 4mms of penetration.
i have gotten a nuke with the sidam very recently mind you. yes i got lucky, but still the ammo box was a world changer for sidam.
sidenote, Grb sidam mistral > 9.3 pls gajub its worse than pgz04 and zsu-23-4m4 and machbet and sits at a higher br.
So again, the answer is decompression. Not forcing the IRIAF into a place it’s not even a little bit competitive in. It’s like putting the first plane with AtA missiles 1.3 BR higher than the others even though it’s not equipped for that.
The ayit please in air and ground should go up
Radkampfwagen-90 should go to 9.7 realistic
It’s already worse than the centauro 105 type 16
Zlt 11 all having good thermals and laser warning at Lowe battle rating
Leopard 2a5 should go to 11.7 like challenger 3
And m1a2
Leopard 2pl and 2a4m should get 5.0 s maxed reload
2 Likes
We should be asking for decompression, not compression.
1 Like
I’m aware, however my statement still applies when one vehicle (1) becomes 5 because in the grand scheme of things… “5” is actually “3” and “3” is actually not a big difference from 1 when you consider these vehicles affect 50+ planes…
9M does more than that in sim bud.
Your coping about the A-10 is very much real.
1 Like
Yes, I am an owner. I never got to the Fakours. This is as far as I got with it before giving up. You tell me if this aircraft will be competitive against 8, 12 or 16 AMRAAM equipped aircraft at 13.0 when it wasn’t even competitive at 12.7. I don’t think the RWR will even detect an AMRAAM launch.
1 Like
Good point, I forgot DM13 sucks so much vs angles. Updated my post to reflect that.