you are aware there is multiple other stinger slingers on 9.3 ?
besides that stingers have a realy limitied range and lock helis badly, they are normaly not even realy effective against helis if you dont try do use dumb rockets.
If you use ATGMS they literaly cant reach you more often then not
It is objectively worse in every way to the Su-27SM except for MAWS, it is the worst 13.7 and has been desperately drowning with all the new powercreep.
Objectively, yes it does. It looses all of its advantages and is just a Piece of Garbage. Their is no reason to bring it over an M4A2(75). 3.3 might be acceptable, but given where the Panzers sit, it honestly is fine at 3.0. Again, maybe 3.3.
Sure! Too bad the issue is you found the fluke instead of the average lock… literally go play any stinger vehicle and try to lock onto a heli, go ahead, try it!
Then why is a Su-25T, which also has R-73 and even 2 extra missiles, at a lower BR? Also, I know attackers shouldn’t be good at air to air combat, but the Su-25SM3 is absolutely useless compared to other attackers. And it’s about being balanced, not realism.
i mean the m18 got a pretty big engine upgrade (un-nerf) so the acceleration is much better and can flank more efficiently, honestly i thin its good where it is.
Definitely not facing me. My poor little Aim-9Ps were useless. If I was lucky I’d get one gun kill every 10 or 15 matches. I don’t think one aircraft getting one or two Fakour kills per match is “overperforming”. Once players figured out how to dodge them the number of Fakour kills per match dropped off significantly. There’s no hope to ever finish spading this aircraft at all against AMRAAMS when all you’ve got is crappy Sparrows and rear-aspect IR missiles.
Your experience, as fogged and obscure as it could be (human memory is bad), is not fully representative of an aircraft’s performance. The IRIAF just farms when even halfway ok ppl play it. It also doesn’t have any business facing 11.7 at all.
Chinese top tier mbts supposed to be in a lower tier like 11.7.they are hard to use in 12.0 top tier battles.they can back to 12.0 in the future upgrades,but now they should be in lower tiers before they are buffed.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Lvrbv 701
9.7 > 9.3
Reasoning: The Lvrbv 701 is severely outclassed by most other SPAAs at its BR, with its only advantage being range. However, it struggles to make use of said range, as it lacks any means of easily detecting aircraft. It is best used against helicopters, but at 9.7, it starts facing helicopters that can hover close to its maximum range. This wouldn’t be an issue if it carried a search radar or IRST, but having to visually identify targets makes it significantly harder to use. Additionally, it is entirely outranged by helicopters in any sort of uptier, which, at 9.7, is not uncommon.
When faced with planes, it once again suffers due to its inability to quickly spot them. The Lvrbv 701’s poor turret traverse and limited elevation angles make it ineffective against most aircraft it will face, as they either climb too high or stay too low and close to be targeted efficiently.
When compared to SPAAs at its BR it is mediocre at best, when compared to anything higher BR it is entirely obsolete. With several other SAMs already found at lower BRs, I do not believe lowering the Lvrbv 701’s BR will suddenly make it broken, simply slightly more useable. You will still have to rely on eyeballs mk1 to spot and engage targets.
Additionally, at 9.3 it would fit much nicer into a lineup, as currently the Strf 9040B is the only other 9.7 ground vehicle Sweden has access to, ignoring premiums.