lahatut moved up to 9.0 from 8.7? are you kidding me? You rarely see anyone playing it, it has no guns only tow missiles which dont even one shot most tanks and you get no ballistic computer for its 14 stock hydra rockets. stock grinding that thing is a pain already, and youre about to make it worse! not even mentioning the fact that isreal doesnt even have a 9.0 lineup.
Panther D
RB
5.3 → 5.7
With the later Panthers moved up to 6.0, the Panther D has the space to move up to 5.7. Compared to its Panther peers, it has the best mobility, and its only downside is the slow turret traverse. As a vehicle it can perform on the same level as the Tiger I, and is superior to all contemporary 5.3 medium tanks in all aspects besides turret traverse.
AIR RB F4J (US TT) 12.0>11.3 At its current Br the F4j has a few things going for it, HMD PD radar but those facts even when spaded are out weighed by its drawbacks: Its HMD makes locking targets difficult, Its Gun pod is absolutely horrendous and has a very low ammo count, Its missiles (aim 9 D) are not suitable for 12.0, its maneuverability is subpar to anything else it faces. overall the F4J Is basically the f4S without the slats and better weaponry yet its at the exact same BR.
yea i agree, i really dont understand why they moved the j7d down and left the kfir at 11.0
Apparently yes
Stupid players with a side of $$$$.
The J-7D needs to be 11.0.
VK 30.02 (M)
RB
5.0 → 5.3
Similar to the Panther D, it outperforms the contemporary medium tanks at its BR, with the exception of its poor turret traverse. It wields incredible firepower, which is totally overkill while facing tanks of the 4.0-4.3 range, and in return is frontally impenetrable to most of those opponents as well. Medium tanks in downtiers should not behave like heavy tanks, they should not be nearly frontally invulnerable.
A-5C
Air RB
BR: 10.7, rank 6 > 10.0 rank 7
Reasoning:
Its BR is too high for being a rank 6, so increase it. Its performance is not good enough and two Magic 1s are not good enough to keep it at 10.7 or 10.3.
The F-4C, F8 are going down, majority of Strikes and Fighters aircraft are going down, MiG-21s are going down to 10.3!
The A-5C should not be 10.7 which it is right now, and 10.3 is high, and to an extent 10.0 is still high, 9.7 would be appropriate. But lets lower to 10.0 first and go from there.
Realistic, Ki-200. 8.7 > 8.0. Crippled by a 4-minute fuel limit (matching the Me 163 B at 8.0), outsped by supersonic contemporaries like the Swift F.7, MiG-15Bis, and F-86F-2, and struggles further in uptiers against 9.3+ jets. Its nerfed 30mm cannons with only 120 rounds lack lethality and ammo reserves to secure kills reliably, while its poor energy retention and acceleration doom it at its current BR.
GRB
2S6 Tunguska
10.7 > 10.3/9.7
Ever since the SACLOS missile changes Tunguska has performed worse than the Strela at 10.3. I think splitting the modernization mod into a higher tier tunguska would be a better idea allowing for a lower tier Shilka alternative that gets saclos guided missiles. If anyone has spent a reasonable amount of time with the missiles they’d understand how terrible they are now. This of course isn’t an isolated problem, a lot of other SPAA should go down while Strela goes up.
Oh my god this is not fine , the Brazilian AMX keept the 11.3 but now it will be forced to face F16’S , this is one of the most disgusting BR changes i’ve seen past years…
Ground RB
XM975/FlaRakPz 1
10.3 > 10.0
Reason: Underpowered SPAA, completely replaced by OSA, no advantages over french one except elevation.
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: F-14B
Change: AIM-9L—> AIM-9M, OR move BR 13.0–> 12.7
Reason: Similar aircraft such as the F-15A have access to AIM-9Ms at the same BR, yet the F-14B is inferior in performance yet it is newer than the F-15A and historically carried the AIM-9M. Although it does have Phoenixes, they are inferior to the Fakour-90s and AIM-120s found at the same BR, and is not justification for it to remain at 13.0 without IRCCM missiles.
8.0+an airspawn (interceptor classification) would be best for all the Me-16s3 and the Ki-200.
It eliminates their need to use a ton of fuel when taking off.
I saw you complaining about the IRIAF going up earlier. You clearly are unhappy about the F-16 going to 12.3 however you are also unhappy with the IRIAF going up.
Does this mean you earnestly believe that the IRIAF with it’s Fakour-90 missiles and R-27-R1s should be at the same battle-rating as an F-16 with only 6 aim-9Ls? Real question.
F104G has flares
No. Acting like 2S6 is equivalent to stinger gepards and osa…
Sory meant to put chinese one .
chinese one doesn’t.
So the F16A Block 10 for USA gets down to 12.3 while the Israeli Netz is kept at 12.7 just for having slightly better missiles ???
Atleast if they keep the Netz at 12.7 give it its missing 120 Countermeasures modification it had in real life for it to be relevant at that high br when you are almost useless as you cant BVR with your Python’s or either flank as you will get absolutely dunked by a Fox-1/3 if you try so