A-5C
Air RB
BR: 10.7, rank 6 > 10.0 rank 7
Reasoning:
Its BR is too high for being a rank 6, so increase it. Its performance is not good enough and two Magic 1s are not good enough to keep it at 10.7 or 10.3.
The F-4C, F8 are going down, majority of Strikes and Fighters aircraft are going down, MiG-21s are going down to 10.3!
The A-5C should not be 10.7 which it is right now, and 10.3 is high, and to an extent 10.0 is still high, 9.7 would be appropriate. But lets lower to 10.0 first and go from there.
3 Likes
Realistic, Ki-200. 8.7 > 8.0. Crippled by a 4-minute fuel limit (matching the Me 163 B at 8.0), outsped by supersonic contemporaries like the Swift F.7, MiG-15Bis, and F-86F-2, and struggles further in uptiers against 9.3+ jets. Its nerfed 30mm cannons with only 120 rounds lack lethality and ammo reserves to secure kills reliably, while its poor energy retention and acceleration doom it at its current BR.
4 Likes
GRB
2S6 Tunguska
10.7 > 10.3/9.7
Ever since the SACLOS missile changes Tunguska has performed worse than the Strela at 10.3. I think splitting the modernization mod into a higher tier tunguska would be a better idea allowing for a lower tier Shilka alternative that gets saclos guided missiles. If anyone has spent a reasonable amount of time with the missiles they’d understand how terrible they are now. This of course isn’t an isolated problem, a lot of other SPAA should go down while Strela goes up.
1 Like
Oh my god this is not fine , the Brazilian AMX keept the 11.3 but now it will be forced to face F16’S , this is one of the most disgusting BR changes i’ve seen past years…
2 Likes
Ground RB
XM975/FlaRakPz 1
10.3 > 10.0
Reason: Underpowered SPAA, completely replaced by OSA, no advantages over french one except elevation.
3 Likes
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: F-14B
Change: AIM-9L—> AIM-9M, OR move BR 13.0–> 12.7
Reason: Similar aircraft such as the F-15A have access to AIM-9Ms at the same BR, yet the F-14B is inferior in performance yet it is newer than the F-15A and historically carried the AIM-9M. Although it does have Phoenixes, they are inferior to the Fakour-90s and AIM-120s found at the same BR, and is not justification for it to remain at 13.0 without IRCCM missiles.
2 Likes
8.0+an airspawn (interceptor classification) would be best for all the Me-16s3 and the Ki-200.
It eliminates their need to use a ton of fuel when taking off.
2 Likes
I saw you complaining about the IRIAF going up earlier. You clearly are unhappy about the F-16 going to 12.3 however you are also unhappy with the IRIAF going up.
Does this mean you earnestly believe that the IRIAF with it’s Fakour-90 missiles and R-27-R1s should be at the same battle-rating as an F-16 with only 6 aim-9Ls? Real question.
2 Likes
F104G has flares
No. Acting like 2S6 is equivalent to stinger gepards and osa…
1 Like
Sory meant to put chinese one .
1 Like
chinese one doesn’t.
1 Like
So the F16A Block 10 for USA gets down to 12.3 while the Israeli Netz is kept at 12.7 just for having slightly better missiles ???
Atleast if they keep the Netz at 12.7 give it its missing 120 Countermeasures modification it had in real life for it to be relevant at that high br when you are almost useless as you cant BVR with your Python’s or either flank as you will get absolutely dunked by a Fox-1/3 if you try so
1 Like
You mean in regards to the changes that was only announced for ground?
Not a picture, but it’s stated here: Photos of World's last active service F-14 Tomcat jets overhauled in Iran - The Aviationist
GRB
Type 81 (C)
11.3 > 11.7
Reason: Restore full 35G overload to the missile, improve locking to what its supposed to be (10km)
Japan requires a top tier SPAA
F-16A at 12.3
guys, for the love of god, stop drinking methanol
4 Likes
Makes zero sense with any degree of realism in mind, like you are spawning them somewhere they physically would not be able to reach with their fuel. You’d have to reduce max fuel by 1m for this to make sense and that defeats the purpose almost. The game simply requires decompression and that is the only solution.
Pz. IV Ausf. F2, Ausf. G (L/43 tanks)
RB
3.3 → 3.7
The firepower is overkill for its BR. While its armor is suboptimal, the mobility and fire controls remain fairly strong for its tier. There is no need for 2.3 tanks to face a long 75 on a stable platform. Moreover, the improved armor protection of the Ausf. G, especially with add-on tracks, makes it actually resistant to many of its contemporary medium tanks (T-34, M4) at some ranges.
These tanks can perform similarly to the current Ausf. J/Befehlswagen, which is hampered compared to other L/48 variants (Ausf. H, Italian Ausf. G) which retain a superior turret traverse system.
5 Likes
I just finished spading it and i can confidently say that you can only do ANYTHING if the airspace is uncontested. If there are any other planes or helicopters in the air, you are dead. There is nothing you can do other than evade and pray for player incompetence. Not to mention, if you get hit with a single bullet, your entire weapons system dies.
Currently struggling through the Tzefa B now as well. It’s at a higher BR, but without the Lahatut’s mobility it’s really hard to do well in it.