IJN Aoba also has 6 8-inch guns @ 5.7, but it is weird that cruisers with 6-10 8-inch guns all at 5.7
1 Like
The T28 is definitely weaker than the T95, however in a favourable situation, where it doesn’t have to worry about getting flanked, such as roads/corridors on one of the many city maps, or on maps where it is able engage at longer ranges. It is in effect an T95 at 0.7 BR lower, just because of its frontal armour. You do need to worry a bit more about turning your hull than the T95, but it is still a vehicle that can be very hard to kill, since the sheer amount of frontal armour it has.
That is also why i am only suggesting it goes to 6.7, instead of the same BR as the T95 that is a BR 7.0, but with its amount frontal armour it have, and a very effective cannon, it doesn’t make sense why there should be that much of a BR difference between them.
So you want it 0.3 worse than an Su-27 or Mig-29G, but with a vastly ineferior airframe and loadout?
It’s fine at 12.3, we just need decompression.
3 Likes
Air RB Kurnass 2000 12.3 > 11.7 the Kurnass isn’t able to carry any type of fox1 yet is fighting against planes in 13.0 and 13.3 that carry fox3
2 Likes
you need to make a seperate post for each vehicle, and some have already been menitoned, CTRL + F to find them and jsut heart them, i already made some for the heils u menitoned
1 Like
Air RB, He 219 A-7, 4.3 > 3.7.
This plane did not play well in AIR RB battle. Apart from firepower, its flight performance, especially the climb rate and maneuverability, isn’t stronger than BF 110 at 3.7. At least in AIR RB, it should receive lower BR for a better gaming experience.
If the OTOMATIC stays 11.3 then that is where the 2S38 should go. It has an entire read rack of APFSDS, Faster HE-VT with no tracer, silent locking with the Track IRST all while being a light tank with scouting and a scout drone.
8 Likes
Su-22M3/UM3K
REMOVE R-60M/MK, go back to baseline R-60s
These planes have no place right now, but they did back before they got “upgraded” with better missiles and a higher BR. This will allow them to stay at 11.0, as the M4 should be moved up.
1 Like
F-84B/G - move up by 0.3 or remove airspawn
Simply playing an aircraft does not give you the right to always have the altitude/speed/energy advantage. They are unfair to fight in early jets because you will never be able to outclimb them. They’re also very fast for their BRs.
2 Likes
Give TCM AGS M900 or move it down to 10.7
2 Likes
Vehicle: AMX A-1A
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: ARB: 11.3 -----> 10.7
Reason: The AMX A-1A has worse missiles and guns than the TT AMX so it should not be .7 BR higher.
10 Likes
Su-11 - 7.3 > 7.7
It’s too good for 7.3, and it outclasses many planes at that BR.
8 Likes
Realistic, su17m2. 10.0 > 9.7. No flers and very slow
You can not realy dogfight in this jet
It won,t hurt anybody, thrust me .
1 Like
F89 (with 20mms) - 7.0 > 7.3
Very fast plane with an afterburner at 7.0, what could possibly go wrong?
1 Like
Su-22M4
Air SB 11.0 > 11.3
Having so many all-aspect missiles will make these too strong at their current BR if all my other recommended changes are also made.
Air Realistic Battles, Harrier Gr 1 9.7->9.3
Currently has one actually notable advantage (funny SRAAMs), which only work in a small number of cases (also flare-hungry). Apart from that, it is a flying brick.
Mig-9 (early) - 7.3 > 7.0
Just worse than the Mig-9 (late) at the same BR, which isn’t fair to it.
5 Likes
Kugelblitz 7.0 → 6.7.
It’s really not that good, there are no lineups at 7.0, it’s .3 away from a Shilka and M163 for some reason, Germany has no other good options and at 7.3 there is already an alternative so there are a total of 0 use cases.
OTOMATIC 11.3 → 10.3
It’s completely outclassed and outdated, gets outranged by everything and things within range are still impossible to hit, the APFSDS works for self defense but can’t be considered as a serious offensive weapon, it’s a 2S38 but a full BR higher whilst just worse.
Tiger ll 10.5 and Panther ll 7.0 → 6.7
There just a variation on the Tiger ll and Panthers, 10.5 gains firepower over the regular Tiger ll but has double the reload time to counter it so it’s not an upgrade in any way, Panther ll gains mobility at the expense of armor and turret handling, not an upgrade, just a variation.
The compression at this range puts them in a completely different class of vehicles, also removes lineup options… just another case of inflated stats due to low player numbers, the same issue that has plagued this game for the last decade.
Ariete, Sagittario 9.3 → 9.0
Subsonic plane without flares or missiles, slowest vehicle in the match by a long shot that is unable to do anything but punish mistakes by others as it lacks the speed to catch anything and completely locks up in a dive, at 9.0 it will perform the exact same with the same strengths and weaknesses but won’t be facing all aspect missiles.
Sagittario should be lower than the Ariete but BR compression probably makes this impossible.
Me 163 B-0 / Ki- 200 8.7 > 8.0
The 163 B is 8.0 and the only difference is guns, going from a 30mm to a 20mm isn’t worth a 0.7 BR increase when the game is this heavily compressed, with the nerf from 6m of fuel to 3m of fuel it’s borderline unplayable as well.
R2Y2 all 8.0 > 7.3
This thing has been gutted over the years, and whilst I’m absolutely baffled that it gets removed after all these years as if that even should be in the top 1000 list of things to address, it’s pointless at 8.0 as it was only ever good with an airspawn, and that was at 6.7 back in the day.
Japan also completely lacks CAS at these BR ranges.
11 Likes
is fatter all-aspect?
1 Like
F-104A/C - 9.3>9.7
They are too fast for 9.3, and do not deserve to be fighting Mig-15s and earlier sabres. If the Mig-23BN can be 9.7, so can these.
3 Likes