IS-2, ground realistic.
6.3->6.0
Reason: it’s the same as with the 1944 version
1.Long reload, which means you can get easily swarmed.
2. Volumetric which sometimes happens.
3. Weak turret and hull armor.
4. No gun depression, so finding a sniping spot is hard.
As a sequel to that; MiG-15(all) - Move from 8.0/8.3 to 8.3/8.7, MiG-17(all) - 8.7>9.0
EDIT: Split into multiple comments
Bison is fine in the current compression. It has a mid flight model and speed while having amazing missiles. The radar is nothing to brag about. It is not equal to the mirage 2000s.
well, well, well.
It doesn’t do bad against 5.0 tanks.
i myself have tested it and it’s pretty decent still, i don’t see why it shouldn’t be higher than 3.0, it shouldn’t be going against 2.0 tanks.
Vehicle - F4F early
Mode - ARB
BR - 10.7 → 10.3
Everything else without flairs is going 10.0, I would rather Air gets decompressed but for equivlant sake
IJN Aoba also has 6 8-inch guns @ 5.7, but it is weird that cruisers with 6-10 8-inch guns all at 5.7
The T28 is definitely weaker than the T95, however in a favourable situation, where it doesn’t have to worry about getting flanked, such as roads/corridors on one of the many city maps, or on maps where it is able engage at longer ranges. It is in effect an T95 at 0.7 BR lower, just because of its frontal armour. You do need to worry a bit more about turning your hull than the T95, but it is still a vehicle that can be very hard to kill, since the sheer amount of frontal armour it has.
That is also why i am only suggesting it goes to 6.7, instead of the same BR as the T95 that is a BR 7.0, but with its amount frontal armour it have, and a very effective cannon, it doesn’t make sense why there should be that much of a BR difference between them.
So you want it 0.3 worse than an Su-27 or Mig-29G, but with a vastly ineferior airframe and loadout?
It’s fine at 12.3, we just need decompression.
Air RB Kurnass 2000 12.3 > 11.7 the Kurnass isn’t able to carry any type of fox1 yet is fighting against planes in 13.0 and 13.3 that carry fox3
you need to make a seperate post for each vehicle, and some have already been menitoned, CTRL + F to find them and jsut heart them, i already made some for the heils u menitoned
Air RB, He 219 A-7, 4.3 > 3.7.
This plane did not play well in AIR RB battle. Apart from firepower, its flight performance, especially the climb rate and maneuverability, isn’t stronger than BF 110 at 3.7. At least in AIR RB, it should receive lower BR for a better gaming experience.
If the OTOMATIC stays 11.3 then that is where the 2S38 should go. It has an entire read rack of APFSDS, Faster HE-VT with no tracer, silent locking with the Track IRST all while being a light tank with scouting and a scout drone.
Su-22M3/UM3K
REMOVE R-60M/MK, go back to baseline R-60s
These planes have no place right now, but they did back before they got “upgraded” with better missiles and a higher BR. This will allow them to stay at 11.0, as the M4 should be moved up.
F-84B/G - move up by 0.3 or remove airspawn
Simply playing an aircraft does not give you the right to always have the altitude/speed/energy advantage. They are unfair to fight in early jets because you will never be able to outclimb them. They’re also very fast for their BRs.
Give TCM AGS M900 or move it down to 10.7
Vehicle: AMX A-1A
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: ARB: 11.3 -----> 10.7
Reason: The AMX A-1A has worse missiles and guns than the TT AMX so it should not be .7 BR higher.
Su-11 - 7.3 > 7.7
It’s too good for 7.3, and it outclasses many planes at that BR.
Realistic, su17m2. 10.0 > 9.7. No flers and very slow
You can not realy dogfight in this jet
It won,t hurt anybody, thrust me .
F89 (with 20mms) - 7.0 > 7.3
Very fast plane with an afterburner at 7.0, what could possibly go wrong?