Mirage 2000D-R1
Air SB 12.3 > 12.0
The 2000D has no place at all right now. It’s too weak for air-to-air and has insufficient weapons for air-to-ground. If moved down to 12.0 it would be a valuable fighter for red teams that currently lack anything to counter the late Phantoms.
Does anyone actually use this thing at 7.0 only thing there is the ZSU-57 it only has a lineup at 7.7
Mirage f1 s 200 and its analogues in the branches from 12.0 > 11.7
J21/A21 - 4.3>4.0
They have no advantages over comparable or even lower BRed planes like the early spitfires. They don’t hold energy that well, they can’t climb, and they can’t dive.
Tbf if its 4.7 then its the same br as the LVKV which has less armor and only about 90 rounds of ammo while also having a slower chassis so why should it be the same BR?
mig23ml does have RWR
Mirage 2000C-S5
Air SB 12.3 > 12.7
Being 12.3 doesn’t matter right now since there’s no 12.3 bracket, but one there is this plane will be way too strong. It’s the direct counterpart to the MiG-29 and early F-16 and should be matched with them.
I have a comment but is not related to changes in the BRs…So here it is:
Can you at Gaijin possibly have become so lazy that do not even bother to format correctly a simple excel document???
A6M6c - 5.0(or wherever it is)>4.7
Worse than the A6M5 ko, and it’s BR needs to reflect that.
Realistic Battle (Air), MIG23ML (Russia). 11.7 > 11.3. Because its radar is not as good as that of other aircraft of the same brand and it often has to engage in combat with F-14, F-20A, Mirage, etc.
Vehicle - Jaguar GR.1A
Mode - ARB
BR - 10.7 → 10.3
Completly outclass at its BR currently, only gets 2 Aim9Gs and a poor FM for its BR
Fair point.
I wouldn’t be against the LVKV going down either.
Vehicle - Jaguar A
Mode - ARB
BR - 10.7 → 10.3
Completly outclass at its BR currently, only gets 2 Aim9Gs and a poor FM for its BR
Vehicle - Jaguar E
Mode - ARB
BR - 10.7 → 10.3
Completly outclass at its BR currently, only gets 2 Aim9Gs and a poor FM for its BR
IS-2 (1944), ground realistic.
6.7->6.3
Reason:
- Long reload, which means you can get easily swarmed.
- Volumetric which sometimes happens.
- Weak turret armor.
- No gun depression, so finding a sniping spot is hard.
Literally a tank destroyer with a turret
JA37D
Air SB 11.7 > 12.0
Its toolkit is too good for 11.7. PD radar and four all-aspect missiles is too strong and fits much better at 12.0 where it goes against aircraft with equivalent capabilities.
Problem is, do you wanna point to the class where sweden has any other 4.3 or 4.7 tanks? Again its screwed either way, sending it to 4.7 or keeping it at 4.3 still makes it a worthless vehicle.
It’s only 4 directional which makes it near impossible to notch radar missiles and can’t even see some bands like other Mig-23ML’s.
We need a separation between Fox 3 jets and normal Fox 1 jets, there is no way we have to fight eurofighters in F15As.
M4A3 (105) (Realistic Battles)
3.0 → 3.7
Ok, this thing absolute slams every moving target it sees on a slight downtier, its heat can pen pretty much anything on its BR and under and the HE can pretty much overpressure anything knowing where to aim or not.
It’s armor also ignores most of the tanks that it goes against, now if you slightly angle it, it’s just a dead-end for them.
You can easily use it on higher BRs too, just look at the historical br spookston’s video about m4a3 105.