Planned Battle Rating Changes for February 2025

Für Fahrzeuge wie Su 25 und A 10 wäre meines erachtens nach es wichtiger das Map desingn und die Ziele zu verändern so das diese nicht zwingend in den Luftkampf müssen und ihre Aim 9M und R 73 nur defensiv brauchen → so kann das BR höher bleiben und die AAM sind nicht sichere kills aber gleichzeitig können die groundattacker ihrer aufgabe nachgehen bodenziele zu bekämpfen und müssen nicht gegen flugtechnisch weit überlegene in den luftkampf gehen

Tank - Object 122
Mode - GRB
Br - 8.7 → 9.0 Its a better armoured (UFP) T-62 but also has LRF and 4 good ATGMs that it can fire in addition without any sort of deployment.

3 Likes

Air Arcade Battle, Harrier GR.7 13.0 > 12.7/12.3

The Harrier GR.7 is a subsonic attack aircraft that is in the same BR as supersonic aircraft capable of employing ARH missiles (F-4F ICE, JA-37DI, Kfir Block 60) and whose only defense is short-range IR missiles. It also does not have gliding bombs or any other means of attacking without having to climb high enough to be shot down by an ARH missile.

2 Likes

Air Realistic Battles, F-104G (Germany, Italy, France). 11.0 > 10.7. Weak flight performance and low amount of weaponry in comparison with aircraft on its BR

Example: MiG-21bis have better flight performance and 6 all-aspect IR missiles, when F-104G have just 4 rear-aspect IR missiles (also Italian F-104G have just 2 of them)

4 Likes

ground RB, saab 105G . 8.3>8.7 .it have ccip but not as good as a32a

4 Likes

F-111A
Air SB 10.3 > 11.0
High speed and MAW make it functionally impossible to intercept for most of the aircraft at its current BR. It should be given AIM-9Js to compensate for the BR increase.

4 Likes

I named it soley because it has enough range + guidance time to even hit it properly. Which is already where most other SPAA’s at this BR-Range fail… Realistically (unless the KA-50 played is really bad), only HQ-17, TOR and spikes are a threat (though the latter is very situational)

ground RB, Alpha jet E . 9.0>8.7 . it donot have flare and DEFA553 is far from BK27

4 Likes

Realistic Tank Battles, AMX 50 (TOA 100) 7.7 > 7.3/7.0(prefer). Bad armor, penetration, only 8 shells to shoot without long reload, no stab. It can`t does anything at BRs higher 8.0 without you having hands of cybersport.

4 Likes

Ground RB, FV4030/3.

Remain at 9.7, remove L23.
Had the Shir 2 gone into service it’s unlikely to have had an APFSDS shell, instead relying on the L11A5 or some derivative APDS, this is a simple historical change that reduces the effective range whilst not effecting the play style much. Allowing for a great chance of counter play.

Vehicle: AV-8S (Late)
Battle Rating: 11.0 → 10.0 (replace AIM-9L with AIM-9P or AIM-9P-4)
Mode: Air Realistic Battles (ARB)
Reasoning: While it may seem good with four AIM-9L and 240 countermeassures, the Airframes of first Generation Harriers is currently not able to keep up with +11.0 airframes, such as MiG-21bis (even Bison), MiG-23ML/A/D, VIggen, J-7D/E and similar up. It currently relies entirely on lucky shots with AIM-9Ls against unaware targets. Experienced Pilots may be able to deal with said hostiles, but overall average and majority of players dislike to play it, as it simply cannot be handled well in an enjoyable matter.
Therefore moving the AV-8S (Late) down to 10.0 and replacing the AIM-9L with AIM-9P / P-4 would greatly improve the gameplay experience of players, while keeping its unique feature and a reasonable BR.

AIM-9P/N on AV-8S in Spanish Service



8 Likes

AIR RB
F14A TOMCAT (1970)
12.7—>12.3

Why does the f14A (1970) that has only aim54A and aim9 (rear-aspect) and aim7F (which are radar missiles that almost everyone in that BR have) must be at 12.7 and meet f15 (with aim-9m) and f16 (with aim9L) and instead a more performing platform in everything (except in BVR) like f16A must be 12.3? I understand that it only has IR missiles but it is still a good plane for dogfight, bombing bases etc…except in BVR but that is obvious, then let’s remember that the aim54 have just 17g of overload and are missiles that take time to reach their maximum speed, in addition once reached they take us very little to lose speed becoming flying bins of 17g of overload, if someone comes to tell me that the aim54 are strong…bro you have skill issue

3 Likes

F-4E (all versions)
Air SB 10.7 > 11.0
The BR decrease was a huge mistake and completely unjustified. 10.7 is currently severely compressed and many planes are useless thanks to the 11.0s going down. (You’re gonna see this same line a lot, because the last round of BR changes was awful.)

1 Like

C1 Ariete (WAR)
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.

8 Likes

C1 Ariete PSO
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.

7 Likes

Air Realistic Battles, Shenyang F-5, 9.3 > 9.0 or 8.7
I believe that the Shenyang F-5 can no longer compete with the current 9.3 matchmaker. In a 10.3 game, the Shenyang is forced to compete against all aspect missiles, such as the AIM-9L or R60M/MK, while also being at the same Battle Rating of aircraft with a better missile kit and or a better airframe.
The Shenyang genuinely struggles at 9.3 and as a result I believe it should be 9.0/8.7

4 Likes

Lol, you have long-range fox-3 and one of the strongest airframes, but still want more…

Ariete AMV
12.0—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Ariete at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the Leopard 2A7s is at the same br while being better in every way. Along with one of the worst ammo layouts
Remove DM53 and the 5 second reload if need be.

6 Likes

Biased lol ypu completely ignored the pen difference and only further proved why gaijin gives it a faster reload since it doesn’t have the same pen, reload will always be a balancing factor. Its why crews reload in perfect time in combat. Your entire argument screams that you domt care about balance considering you forget that 48mm pen is almost a requirement at 2.0 to deal with the influx of 40mm armored tanks

you may ask for 6 fakours not the R73s,since they’ve never carried by F14A-IRIAF