Ground Realistic
KV-1E
4.0 → 4.3
One of, if not the most powerful tank for its BR. It is not uncommon for it to being able to get 10 kills without getting killed once. It is very hard to contest the vehicle, since it has so much armor as it currently have at its BR, which also is very easy to angle to deflect enemy shots.
So, maybe 7.7 for the MK2, and 8.0 for the MK.6
Increasing F-16C-Barak-II’s Ground BR while not adding AGM65’s is outrageous.
This F16 has nothing but GPS and Guided bombs against ground units while other one’s enjoy F&F munitions.
Solution: Add AGM65D’s to F-16C Barak-II.
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: F-16A Block 10 Netz
BR Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Reason: It’s basically the same as American F-16A Block 10. Python-3 is a minimal difference. Wherever the American Block 10 goes, the Netz should also go.
well i just saw ur stats
tho i have used all fox-3 missiles that are currently on main server and i declare it the best one
Abrams is outright superior to the leclerc what are you on? It has a better shell, it’s more survivable and has actual usable armor hull down. The leclercs are more equivalent to 11.7 Abrams over 12.0 Abrams. The only benefit the leclerc really gets is mobility. The autoloader benefits it as much as it hinders it. In good hands the Abrams is the 2nd best tank class after the leopards, there isn’t a scenario where it would be bad. It’s a jack of all trades, use it as such.
Vehicle: Mi-8AMTSh-VN
Game mode: Ground Realistic
BR change: 11.0 → 10.7
Reason: This helicopter have a big silhouette and a lot less ordinance (4x Ataka and 4x Verba) than it’s counterparts at the same BR or even lower like: A129CBT, Mi-35M, Mi-28N, EC-665 HAD.
Air Realistic Battles
A6M5 Ko
5.3 → 5.0
It is wildly outclassed by most of what it faces. The only reason it did well in the first place is because American players would turn fight it- but it now lacks the engine power to even try and keep up with the pace of the 6.3 Prop planes. This change could presumably go to all the zeros- however I am targeting the one I play by far and large the most for sake of ease.
Ground Realistic, M60A1 RISE (P). 8.7>8.3 currently in the US TT (and premiums) the m60a1 RISE (P) is the only tank to sit at 8.7 and has no lineup to go with it that would not force either its lineup to be uptiered to 8.7, or the tank itself to be uptiered to 9.0. along with this the only real difference that the Rise has compared to the AOS is its ERA and its APFSDS which differs from the AOS’s sabot with less than 30mm of extra pen
no reason for this change it has serious troubles at currently BR in 11.3 it will suffer even more and we have others similar vehicles in 10.7/11.0 BR, if gaijin really wants to increase its BR at least should buff its armor.
yeah, we need more helis, the only nation with less Helis is Japan, and we are on par with Sweden, everything else has much more
Every other Spike carrier is 11.3, only makes sense it matches. Unless you want to move all spikes down.
Edit: NVM they’re 11.0
Ground Realistic - Harrier GR.3
9.7 > 9.3
The First gen Harriers have no advanced muntions (for example, AS-20 Nords, AGM-12 Bullpup, or AGM-62 Walleye), poor RWR, and poor flight performance. To bring them in line with other platforms (such as the Buccaneer S.2 or the G.91YS) in GRB I suggest lowering their BR slightly to allow for breathing room against some of the advanced SAMs and supersonic swingrole attackers/multirole fighters in it’s BR range
Do you really think T-80UD should be in 10.3 BR? It’s ridiculous to compare it to Leopard 1 in 9.3 BR. Leopard 1 is weaker than t80ud in every aspect and is unbeatable. Please increase BR of 80ud more than 11.0 along with BR expansion above gr 13.0 and air 15.0
I cant hold w+m1 straight into someone while absorbing every shell and being able to ufp everything I see no problems like the propaganda documentary from 2005 says I should
gaijin fix plz
FRENCH:
char 25 t 8.0 > 7.7 or 7.3
This tank only penetrates 209 mm, it doesn’t even have APDS, and its mobility isn’t anything extraordinary; no one ever understood why this light tank is at 8.0
leclerc ( all versions ) 12.0 > 11.7
The Leclerc is the most underrated top-tier MBT, being the most expensive NATO MBT and, along with the Ariete, the two weakest in the game.
Mirage 4000 13.0 > 12.7
This plane is incredibly good, but being hit by long-range missiles from 14.0 frequently killed its potential.
Sweden
CV90120 11.7 > 11.3
Light tanks need to make full use of their mobility to stand out, but the big problem is being a large, paper-thin light tank in a BR where almost everyone has very high mobility and .50 caliber coaxial or top-mounted weapons
EUA
M1 Abram 10.7 > 10.3
The M1 Abrams is a great tank with good performance, but its armor is weak and its ammunition is terrible, especially when playing so frequently against 11.7 tanks.
Ground Realistic
KV-7 (U-13)
4.0 → 4.3
It have a lot of armer for its BR, while it doesn’t have a turret like the KV-1E / B, it instead have a better cannon, that have access to APCR, if it needs to attack enemy tanks with more armor.
Aircraft: G8N1
Game Mode: Realistic Air Battles
BR Change: 6.3 → 5.7
It is genuinely insane to me that you would consider moving up the G8 from where it already is. While it may have good defensive armament, that is absolutely not a reason to push it up when it has a worse functional bomb load than planes at BR 3.0, and is significantly slower than a lot of the other bombers in that range.
Anyone who has flown it knows that you will be forced to just sit there while those in A2D and 288 go and take everything. And if you’re just slow enough and not dead you could take out a base once they respawn.
And they “stole” apaches and the havoc as well bruh, like, there gotta be a brimstone or LMM helo sometimes
Spike PUMA and Freccia are at 10.7 though.