Planned Battle Rating Changes for February 2025

Can we use our own Helicopter and Plane as CAS in Ground Arcade battle ?

3 Likes

Realistic, AMX-32 (105)
Change: 9.3->9.0
Reason: A very poor tank all-around. Low armour, low mobility, average firepower. The 120-mm armed AMX-32 on the same BR (9.3) is much better in all respects

21 Likes

I honestly believe that the 2S38 Should be moved up to 11.0 First off this vehicle is a premium that even in an uptier can Perform Better than anything like it at that BR. its RPM can’t be matched by any vehicles outside the Russian tech tree You can track Aircraft it has a proximity fuse round And his mobility is quite good There’s nothing in the Game that can perform as well as it at 10.3 in anti-air and in anti tank roles.

13 Likes

Air Realistic
Kfir C.2 11.7 ➡ 11.0
Sports identically the same flight performance as the Kfir Canard while only carrying two python 3s. After the pythons have been launched you are locked to guns in a BR range where radar missiles and PD radars become very plentiful, this BR range would alleviate its shortcomings in its offensive loadout choices as the pythons are relatively easy to flare.

5 Likes

Ground RB
KPz-70: 9.3 → 9.7

This vehicle has top-tier worthy mobility, gun handling and reload speed. It can also get ridiculous gun depression due to it’s adaptive suspension. It’s only cons are a bad shell and lack of thermals, but the latter isn’t pretty common at 9.3 anyways.
It also has a 20mm autocannon which can help against helicopters and light vehicles.

11 Likes

What kinda take is that lol, more survivable? The turret is literally the most free kill, at least with the KF51 you can sit hull down. Not to mention KF also has more pen on the 30mm. Guess by that logic the Freccia should be 11.0 since it has 10 spike missiles lol.

1 Like

Vehicle: Strv 122B+
Gamemode: Ground (All)
BR Change: 12.0 → 12.3

Reason: The Strv 122B+ is in the top league of top MBTs and far surpasses most other 12.0s in performance, quite a bit better than vehicles like the Strv 122A it shares a BR with, as well as other Leopard 2s at 12.0 like the 2A5/2A6. It, along with the other top top MBTs (Leopard 2A7V, Leopard 2A7HU), need to move up in BR away from the rest of 12.0.

19 Likes

It Isn’t a br change round of Gaijin don’t move up in br at least One italian vehicle for no reason

1 Like

Naaah…

AIM-9L is still brutal for planes in that radius.
Especially which are subsonic or countermeasure-less

8 Likes

Vehicle - Mi-24D
Mode - GRB
BR - 8.7 → 9.0/3

Better then the Mi24A by having a RWR, 128 CMs and IRCM jamming.

4 Likes

B7A2 (Homare 23)
Air Realistic 3.7 → 4.0
This thing is ridiculous, its the same BR as the tech tree B7A2 but with a noticably stronger engine, I am by no means a top notch air player, but even I manage around a 5/1 K/D and a 73% win rate, its unfair at its current BR, as it essentially is a fighter with an air spawn if you drop the bomb, giving it a large advantage over contemporary fighters

14 Likes

I know the *Fater is in the files. That’s not sufficient for 13.0.

Less countermeasures, worse RWR, no MAW

F-14B, Simulator Battles, 12.7 > 13.0

F-14B eliminates the disadvantages of the F-14A which are engines, low countermeasures, limited RWR and rear aspect missiles. ARH carriers will always be at an advantage over SARH carriers in simulator battles and the F-14B does not face any ARH carriers at 12.7 and below.

This plane does not sacrifice anything, it has good radar, missiles and flight performance. This is under tiered at 12.7.

I request the battle rating to be adjusted to be the same as RB battle rating.

8 Likes

Nah. They can go back down or be given their forward spawn. Gaijin already said they were terrible at their old BR. They are no better at the new position.

Please consider moving the Su-27S and J-11 down to 13.0 in Air Simulator Battles.

At their current BR of 13.3 in Simulator, they are permanently stuck fighting EFT’s, Rafales, F-15E’s and more planes that heavily outclass the early Flankers’ kit, radar, RWR, and flight performance.

At a BR of 13.0 in Sim they would actually become playable as they would get to take part in the 12.3-13.0 matchmaker alongside comparable planes like the F-15A, Mirage 4000, JAS-39A, F-4F ICE, and AV-8B+.

8 Likes

I wouldn’t choose the Ariete as a meter of comparison tbh.
The thing really shouldn’t be above 11.3

3 Likes

6.3 to 7.0 is WAY too compressed as well, like late war tanks having to go against light vehicles with far superior mobility and fire power (ex: ATGMs) is crazy.

2 Likes

as for changes that aren’t included:

Kurnass 2000: ARB 12.3 > 12.0 - The K2K, due to the lack of FOX1s and… lacking flight performance of the F-4E airframe isn’t a great aircraft at 12.3. Seeing as it used to be at 11.7 (with the F-4E at 11.0), i believe it should return to being .7 above the F-4E at 12.0.

3 Likes

Tell me you don’t have XS without telling me LMAO what are you talkin about even

2 Likes