we all know the data gathering process is beyond flawed but that’s just beating the dead horse… I mean come on, they unironically think the Type 90 and M1A1 are inferior to the Ariete WAR/PSO…
Air Simulator Battles, Su-11, 7.0 > 8.0
The Su-11 is much more powerful than any other 7.0 aircraft, having performance closer to the F-84G at 8.0. At 8.0, the Su-11 would still have speed and TWR advantages over the majority of aircraft, but would not outperform them in all respects to an egregious degree.
China M60a3 TTS ---- adding M774 APFSDS
Otherwith it is too weak comparing to US M60A3TTS, while they both at 9.0 BR.
You will notice that I have made posts advocating basically all 13.0 aircraft being increased in BR to 13.3, not just the Su-27. It is only because of the post rules that this individual post calls out the Su-27, so, no, I was not specifically targeting the Su-27.
That said, I stand by my words. There is no 12.0 aircraft that currently should be facing off against any Flanker.
nvm didn’t type what I thought I did earlier, its really just gaijin’s fault for rules that create issues
but my point is that all 13.0s are about as good as every other 13.0 with rare exception like sea harrier fa2
VEXTRA 105 - Add OFL 120 F2 and adjust to 10.3 or 10.0
Leopard 2A4NL, the only vehicle with a version of BR 10.0 or higher, is lonely
Why do customers need to worry about the company’s profit?
Then, If I get an awful Big Mac from McDonald’s, shouldn’t I complain about that online too? Because it will impact the profit of McDonald’s and will go out of business from the UK eventually?
We are spending money on them.
So, they need to fix the game.
It is the customer’s right to get treated properly.
Gaijin even rarely run collaboration projects, unlike its counterparts which actively do.
Where did all that money go?? into Anton’s pocket?
I admit that running the game isn’t charity. but the compression problem expired long ago and is full of mould now.
America F4E Need to increase AN/AVQ-23。Please, F4E is really needed,F4E can From 11.0 to 11.3 in land history。
Is having flares better than not having flares? Yes.
But it’s so exhausting listening to how a plane not having flares makes it unequivocal worse or a ‘free kill’. It’s non-stop in this community.
Then, I’ll watch an entire lobby of people who are flying a plane without flares proceed to be the first one into the red blob and complain. It’s the very definition of insanity.
You can, like, I dunno, not put yourself in a position to be shot by said missile? Let’s start with not racing into the middle of the map, to the closest base or first red dot that appears and go from there.
While I don’t know if I entirely agree with your assertion, I will say that, in my proposals, almost all the 13.0s are going up as a block to 13.3. So that balance will not be greatly disturbed.
Even then. imo. its not a bad vehicle, its just modeled really badly
because it goes into development and upkeeping of the game the game they play
you say “why do customers need to worry” but then you would complain if 0 bugs would get fixed and nothing would get added into the game.
im not saying anyone needs to care but everyone will care and complain.
unfortunately a big mac as a product and a whole videogame is a little different (false equivalency). you didnt buy a battlerating placement. you didnt buy this game. youre playing this game free and the game relies on people buying premium vehicles, time and other stuff for profit and there needs to be a reason to make them interested in buying these things and that is, by making people not able to research things too fast.
You are simultaneously incorrect and correct.
Yes as a free product, you are less inclined to complain about war thunder as opposed to a paid product. However the game needs profits, the game wants profits, if the game isn’t treating you well for free it doesn’t really help the intelligent consumer to want to spend money on it.
So as an intelligent consumer you are still allowed to criticize the game in that regard. You just cant do it from the stance of “I paid for this and it’s wrong”, it’s more like “If you want me to spend money on this, you should do better”
If Gaijin is really worried about ‘research speed’ bullshit, then they shouldn’t sell Rank 7~8 prem at all.
Current compression over the early jet era is just broken as hell, almost feels like ‘if you want to go higher, buy rank 7 premium. Or suffer in hell for a long, long time.’
Thanks. I should’ve chilled and written with a better theory :|
this doesn’t matter to the pixels on our screens bud.
were all playing on the same physics
I’ve already had too much progress on both and I’ve had to make separate contacts for both of them. It’s also why I refrain from stating my PC user and using it for social purposes anymore.
It’s not my priority if people believe me or not. Just don’t call me inexperienced because all I wanted out of this account was a tomcat to mess around with.
Just a joke gaijin devs ^^
clearly it is working because gaijin is making good profits right now from their strategy so you dont really get to call it stupid. nor is it worth it to call gaijin customers stupid. thanks to them we have such an advanced game.
pointless complaining isnt intelligent btw.
-
Because when people assume I’m inexperienced when I’m not, I’m not going to take that. Especially when they got through the effort of digging up my stats to win an online argument.
-
13.0 is a direct feeder to 13.7/14.0 It’s very different from 12.7. This has always been the case. 1.0 from TT will always be a bad experience until BRs get a Rework.
I agree with everything else in your post, but this is not true in the slightest… where in the world did you get that from?
Yes it works because gaijin is making a profit due to it. But just because the masses do something, doesn’t suddenly make it not stupid?
The masses spend several hundred dollars on a new Iphone every year that’s not different than the previous model, guess what… that’s a stupid use of finances.
This isn’t “pointless complaining” it’s called criticism, and everyone is entitled to it.