Realistic, Tiger II P, 6.7->6.3. Why much worse version of a vehicle is at the same BR? Its just stupid:(
6 Likes
the range of an aim 120 and acting like an aim120, much better acceleration than the aim54c and with a nerf in multi pathing. him staying on 12.7 is a joke
aim 54a is extremely easy to play and is an inferior missile compared to fakuor
It should get R-73s and 6 fakours but Gaijin might completely screw it over and give it nothing.
Exactly. How a late gen3 or early gen4 plane (depends on where you from) fight a late gen4 fighter with the most advance tech in the game rn.
the fakour is far, far easier to dodge than a 120
1 Like
True
False. it’s very much worse.
It’s called having a seeker the size of a 1000-pound bomb.
It went up because it forced an entire team into a defensive position, and faced planes with truly terrible RWRs. It’s not like it’s on a bad airframe either.
It gets what it deserves.
correct would be to raise the BR of eurofighters, f15s and rafale to 14.3
many 13.0 are completely inferior to these planes
3 Likes
Even a lot of 13.7s don’t even hold a candle to them tbh.
1 Like
No it didn’t. And you know it didn’t.
For 13.0, it’s a mid airframe with mid missiles.
Especially with the Eurofighter, Mig-29s mostly filled 12.7. The IRIAF was rarely/never all of the 4 planes in a downtier.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
The F14A IRIAF while annoying was nowhere near as bad as folks made out, Unlike when the F14A was at 12.3 that thing was rinsing entire lobbies.
“it gets what it deserves” , it doesnt deserve to be foisted to 13.0 fighting against EF2000’s and such, same as most 13.0s right enough
2 Likes
Ground RB, M60A3 TTS (China). 9.0 > 8.7.
The Chinese M60A3 TTS gets M735 with (292mm, 247mm, 169mm) Penetration at 10m and no additional ERA protection.
While the US tech tree M60A3 TTS gets M774 with (372mm, 314mm, 215mm) Penetration at 10m and additional ERA protection at the same 9.0 BR.
China’s 8.7 lineup is severely lacking with 0 tech tree tanks, 1 squadron tank and 1 rare premium tank, where as 9.0 is filled with more vehicles than you can bring out in a full lineup.
2 Likes
oh boy i sure to do love being insulted for my opinion
yeah good luck doing anything with SPO-10
Just screw off and cope that your OP toy got nerfed
If you can’t handle not insulting someone in a discussion, you shouldn’t be here.
That’s an issue with all 13.0s.
I will forever be glad that I no longer have to face them in a Mig-23. No single aircraft should be able to outrange everything so consistently, especially when it faces planes that are unable to really do much against it.
The F-14 singlehandedly changed the way matches are played in its BR range when it got added. This isn’t an opinion, it is a fact. If you do not notch and/or hug the ground in a match vs a team of F-14s, you will eat a phoenix to the dome.
The IRIAF is simply an extension of that.
1 Like
To this day, f14a is oppressive with vehicles below 13.0, so much so that I only take off with an aim54 and can get 2 to 4 kills with the 6aim54
It’s not that it can get kills, it’s just that it is the only plane with ARH missiles at that BR, and that’s why it is unfair. Gaijin needs to add planes to different nations that have somewhat comparable capabilities.
Imagine the outrage if the IRAF went to the Russian tree, everyone would’ve been screaming for it to be 13.0 for a while now.
- Ground RB, T-44 6.7 > 6.3.
- Ground RB, Is-2 1944. 6.7 > 6.3.
- Ground RB, Is-2 6.3 > 6.0.
The reasoning is the same for the first two. These two tanks(T-44&IS-2 1944) were at 6.3 before being moved up to 6.7.
Not because they were OP -because both have glaring weak spots easily penetrated by 6.0 and even 5.3 tanks-, but because stats accumulating over time on vehicles that were simply at their proper battle rating and in good hands were effective.
The br increase made both of these tanks irrelevant as the T-44 lacks penetration in the new matchmaker while maintaining its gigantic mantlet weak spot and gaining new ones thanks to all the monsters at 7.0+ upwards.
The IS-2 1944, while having very easy-to-hit frontal weak spots, namely LFP, mantlet, and cupola, having AT best 20 sec reload with full crew has gone from great in experienced hands to pure suffering, losing any strong point it had ever. A single aphe shot from any 6.0,5.3 tank, to an easily penetrable mantlet, will destroy it.
Stat accumulation over time should not be a reason to make skill-dependant, effective tanks into obscure, dust-collecting irrelevant vehicles.
These tanks are simply unfit to be 6.7, to face 7.7 monsters, when 5.3,6.0 had no problem against them. You cant even compare other 6.7 tanks to the IS-2 1944 when the American and German counterparts are vastly better.
Moving both these tanks up also destroyed the Russian 6.3 lineup(IS-2 with its vastly inferior hull can’t fill the hole left behind by the IS-2 1944, and should not be at 6.3 either.)
Basically reverse the battlerating changes in which, not too long ago, Russian 6.3 was neutered, not because of vehicle capabilities, but purely due to accumulated stats.
3 Likes
Namer really shouldn’t be moved unless its given more spikes or ammo boxes